# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

November  2020, 14(4): 535-553. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020027

## Group signature from lattices preserving forward security in dynamic setting

 Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur-721302, India

* Corresponding author: Meenakshi Kansal

Received  October 2018 Revised  March 2019 Published  September 2019

We propose the first lattice-based dynamic group signature scheme achieving forward security. Our scheme is proven to be secure against framing attack, misidentification attack and preserves anonymity under the learning with errors (${\mathsf{LWE}}$) and short integer solution (${\mathsf{SIS}}$) assumptions in the random oracle model. More interestingly, our setting allows the group manager to generate distinct certificates to distinct users which can be updated by the users themselves without any interaction with the group manager. Furthermore, our scheme is dynamic where signing key of a user is not fixed during the setup and is issued only at the joining time of the user.

Citation: Meenakshi Kansal, Ratna Dutta, Sourav Mukhopadhyay. Group signature from lattices preserving forward security in dynamic setting. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2020, 14 (4) : 535-553. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020027
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Node Labeling
Comparative summary of lattice based group signature schemes
 Scheme Forward secure Dynamic Signature size Public key size Certificate size Signer's SK size [8] No No $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [5] No No $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [10] No No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [14] No No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ [11] No Yes $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\log N \cdot \mathcal{O}(n)$ $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ [15] Yes No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\log N \; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ Ours Yes Yes $\log N\; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^3)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\log N \; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$
 Scheme Forward secure Dynamic Signature size Public key size Certificate size Signer's SK size [8] No No $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [5] No No $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $N\cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [10] No No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ [14] No No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ [11] No Yes $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\log N \cdot \mathcal{O}(n)$ $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ [15] Yes No $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ - $\log N \; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ Ours Yes Yes $\log N\; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^3)$ $\log N \cdot \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\log N \; \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$
 [1] Hui Xu, Guangbin Cai, Xiaogang Yang, Erliang Yao, Xiaofeng Li. Stereo visual odometry based on dynamic and static features division. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021059 [2] Dandan Cheng, Qian Hao, Zhiming Li. Scale pressure for amenable group actions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 1091-1102. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021008 [3] Palash Sarkar, Subhadip Singha. Verifying solutions to LWE with implications for concrete security. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021, 15 (2) : 257-266. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020057 [4] Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2739-2776. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384 [5] Roberto Civino, Riccardo Longo. Formal security proof for a scheme on a topological network. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021  doi: 10.3934/amc.2021009 [6] Chris Guiver, Nathan Poppelreiter, Richard Rebarber, Brigitte Tenhumberg, Stuart Townley. Dynamic observers for unknown populations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3279-3302. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020232 [7] Arseny Egorov. Morse coding for a Fuchsian group of finite covolume. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (4) : 637-646. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.637 [8] Zhang Chen, Xiliang Li, Bixiang Wang. Invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3235-3269. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020226 [9] Alexandr Mikhaylov, Victor Mikhaylov. Dynamic inverse problem for Jacobi matrices. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (3) : 431-447. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019021 [10] Andrés Contreras, Juan Peypouquet. Forward-backward approximation of nonlinear semigroups in finite and infinite horizon. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021051 [11] Palash Sarkar, Subhadip Singha. Classical reduction of gap SVP to LWE: A concrete security analysis. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021  doi: 10.3934/amc.2021004 [12] Zhimin Chen, Kaihui Liu, Xiuxiang Liu. Evaluating vaccination effectiveness of group-specific fractional-dose strategies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021062 [13] Simone Cacace, Maurizio Falcone. A dynamic domain decomposition for the eikonal-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 109-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.109 [14] Xinyuan Liao, Caidi Zhao, Shengfan Zhou. Compact uniform attractors for dissipative non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1087-1111. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1087 [15] Christoforidou Amalia, Christian-Oliver Ewald. A lattice method for option evaluation with regime-switching asset correlation structure. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1729-1752. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020042 [16] Francis Hounkpe, Gregory Seregin. An approximation of forward self-similar solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021059 [17] Joe Gildea, Adrian Korban, Abidin Kaya, Bahattin Yildiz. Constructing self-dual codes from group rings and reverse circulant matrices. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021, 15 (3) : 471-485. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020077 [18] Xianchao Xiu, Ying Yang, Wanquan Liu, Lingchen Kong, Meijuan Shang. An improved total variation regularized RPCA for moving object detection with dynamic background. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1685-1698. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019024 [19] Yuncherl Choi, Taeyoung Ha, Jongmin Han, Sewoong Kim, Doo Seok Lee. Turing instability and dynamic phase transition for the Brusselator model with multiple critical eigenvalues. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021035 [20] Shuting Chen, Zengji Du, Jiang Liu, Ke Wang. The dynamic properties of a generalized Kawahara equation with Kuramoto-Sivashinsky perturbation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021098

2019 Impact Factor: 0.734