2008, 7(4): 853-865. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.853

Limits for Monge-Kantorovich mass transport problems

1. 

Departamento de Matemáticas, U. Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

2. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States

3. 

Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid

4. 

IMDEA Matematicas, C-IX, Campus UAM, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Received  September 2006 Revised  February 2007 Published  April 2008

In this paper we study the limit of Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problems when the involved measures are supported in a small strip near the boundary of a bounded smooth domain, $\Omega$. Given two absolutely continuos measures (with respect to the surface measure) supported on the boundary $\partial \Omega$, by performing a suitable extension of the measures to a strip of width $\varepsilon$ near the boundary of the domain $\Omega$ we consider the mass transfer problem for the extensions. Then we study the limit as $\varepsilon$ goes to zero of the Kantorovich potentials for the extensions and obtain that it coincides with a solution of the original mass transfer problem. Moreover we look for the possible approximations of these problems by solutions to equations involving the $p-$Laplacian for large values of $p$.
Citation: Jesus Garcia Azorero, Juan J. Manfredi, I. Peral, Julio D. Rossi. Limits for Monge-Kantorovich mass transport problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (4) : 853-865. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.853
[1]

Jason Metcalfe, Jacob Perry. Global solutions to quasilinear wave equations in homogeneous waveguides with Neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (2) : 547-556. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.547

[2]

Shu Luan. On the existence of optimal control for semilinear elliptic equations with nonlinear Neumann boundary conditions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 493-506. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017018

[3]

Mariane Bourgoing. Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second order parabolic equations with $L^1$ dependence in time and Neumann boundary conditions. Existence and applications to the level-set approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 21 (4) : 1047-1069. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.1047

[4]

José M. Arrieta, Simone M. Bruschi. Very rapidly varying boundaries in equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. The case of a non uniformly Lipschitz deformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 327-351. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.327

[5]

Yoshifumi Mimura. Critical mass of degenerate Keller-Segel system with no-flux and Neumann boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (3) : 1603-1630. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017066

[6]

Zhenhua Zhang. Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the phase-field equations with neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2005, 4 (3) : 683-693. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.683

[7]

Grégoire Allaire, Yves Capdeboscq, Marjolaine Puel. Homogenization of a one-dimensional spectral problem for a singularly perturbed elliptic operator with Neumann boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (1) : 1-31. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1

[8]

Sándor Kelemen, Pavol Quittner. Boundedness and a priori estimates of solutions to elliptic systems with Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (3) : 731-740. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.731

[9]

Hugo Beirão da Veiga. A challenging open problem: The inviscid limit under slip-type boundary conditions.. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2010, 3 (2) : 231-236. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.231

[10]

T. J. Christiansen. Resonances and balls in obstacle scattering with Neumann boundary conditions. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (3) : 335-340. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.335

[11]

Eugenio Montefusco, Benedetta Pellacci, Gianmaria Verzini. Fractional diffusion with Neumann boundary conditions: The logistic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (8) : 2175-2202. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2175

[12]

Mariane Bourgoing. Viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear second order parabolic equations with $L^1$ dependence in time and Neumann boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 21 (3) : 763-800. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.763

[13]

Dagny Butler, Eunkyung Ko, Eun Kyoung Lee, R. Shivaji. Positive radial solutions for elliptic equations on exterior domains with nonlinear boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (6) : 2713-2731. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.2713

[14]

Giuseppe Da Prato, Alessandra Lunardi. On a class of elliptic and parabolic equations in convex domains without boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 22 (4) : 933-953. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.933

[15]

Ciprian G. Gal, Mahamadi Warma. Elliptic and parabolic equations with fractional diffusion and dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (1) : 61-103. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016.5.61

[16]

Junichi Harada, Mitsuharu Ôtani. $H^2$-solutions for some elliptic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 333-339. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.333

[17]

Luisa Arlotti. Explicit transport semigroup associated to abstract boundary conditions. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 102-111. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.102

[18]

Mamadou Sango. Homogenization of the Neumann problem for a quasilinear elliptic equation in a perforated domain. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (2) : 361-384. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.361

[19]

Neil S. Trudinger, Xu-Jia Wang. Quasilinear elliptic equations with signed measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1/2) : 477-494. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.477

[20]

David Kinderlehrer, Adrian Tudorascu. Transport via mass transportation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (2) : 311-338. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.311

2016 Impact Factor: 0.801

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (0)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

[Back to Top]