• Previous Article
    Kernel-based maximum correntropy criterion with gradient descent method
  • CPAA Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    First jump time in simulation of sampling trajectories of affine jump-diffusions driven by $ \alpha $-stable white noise
August  2020, 19(8): 4143-4158. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020185

Computing eigenpairs of two-parameter Sturm-Liouville systems using the bivariate sinc-Gauss formula

1. 

Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia

2. 

Institute of Mathematics, University of Lübeck, D-23562 Lübeck, Germany

* Corresponding author

Received  September 2019 Revised  February 2020 Published  May 2020

Fund Project: The first author gratefully acknowledges the support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation under grant 3.4-YEM/1142916

The use of sampling methods in computing eigenpairs of two-parameter boundary value problems is extremely rare. As far as we know, there are only two studies up to now using the bivariate version of the classical and regularized sampling series. These series have a slow convergence rate. In this paper, we use the bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling formula that was proposed in [6] to construct a new sampling method to compute eigenpairs of a two-parameter Sturm-Liouville system. The convergence rate of this method will be of exponential order, i.e. $ O(\mathrm{e}^{-\delta N}/\sqrt{N}) $ where $ \delta $ is a positive number and $ N $ is the number of terms in the bivariate sinc-Gaussian formula. We estimate the amplitude error associated to this formula, which gives us the possibility to establish the rigorous error analysis of this method. Numerical illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate our method in comparison with the results of the bivariate classical sampling method.

Citation: Rashad M. Asharabi, Jürgen Prestin. Computing eigenpairs of two-parameter Sturm-Liouville systems using the bivariate sinc-Gauss formula. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4143-4158. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020185
References:
[1]

A. AlAzemiF. AlAzemi and A. Boumenir, The approximation of eigencurves by sampling, Sampl. Theory Signal Image Process., 12 (2013), 127-138.   Google Scholar

[2]

M. H. Annaby and R. M. Asharabi, Computing eigenvalues of boundary-value problems using sinc-Gaussian method, Sampl. Theory Signal Image Process., 7 (2008), 293-311.   Google Scholar

[3]

M. H. Annaby and R. M. Asharabi, Computing eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems by Hermite interpolations, Numer. Algor., 60 (2012), 355-367.  doi: 10.1007/s11075-011-9518-x.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. M. Asharabi, A Hermite-Gauss technique for approximating eigenvalues of regular Sturm-Liouville problems, J. Inequal. Appl., (2016), Art. 154. doi: 10.1186/s13660-016-1098-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. M. Asharabi, Generalized bivariate Hermite-Gauss sampling, Comput. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 29. doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0802-z.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. M. Asharabi and J. Prestin, On two-dimensional classical and Hermite sampling, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36 (2016), 851-871.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/drv022.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. M. Asharabi and M. Tharwat, The use of the Generalized sin-Gaussian sampling for numerically computing eigenvalues of Dirac system, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 48 (2018), 373-386.  doi: 10.1553/etna_vol48s373.  Google Scholar

[8]

F. V. Atkinson and A. B. Mingarelli, Multiparameter Eigenvalue Problems, Sturm-Liouville Theory, Vol. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. A. Binding and P. J. Browne, Asymptotics of eigencurves for second order ordinary differential equations Ⅰ, J. Differ. Equ., 88 (1990), 30-45.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(90)90107-Z.  Google Scholar

[10]

P. A. Binding and P. J. Browne, Asymptotics of eigencurves for second order ordinary differential equations Ⅱ, J. Differ. Equ., 89 (1991), 224-243.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(91)90120-X.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. A. Binding and H. Volkmer, Eigencurves for two-parameter Sturm-Liouville equations, SIAM Rev., 38 (1996), 27-48.  doi: 10.1137/1038002.  Google Scholar

[12]

P. A. Binding and B. A. Watson, An inverse nodal problem for two-parameter Sturm-Liouville systems, Inverse Probl., 25 (2009), Art. 085005. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/8/085005.  Google Scholar

[13]

A. Boumenir and B. Chanane, Eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville systems using sampling theory, Appl. Anal., 62 (1996), 323-334.  doi: 10.1080/00036819608840486.  Google Scholar

[14]

B. Chanane, Computation of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems with parameter dependent boundary conditions using reularized sampling method, Math. Comput., 74 (2005), 1793-1801.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01717-5.  Google Scholar

[15]

B. Chanane and A. Boucherif, Computation of the eigenpairs of two-parameter Sturm-Liouville problems using the regularized sampling method, Abstr. Appl. Anal., (2014), Art. 695303. doi: 10.1155/2014/695303.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. Faierman, The completeness and expansion theorems associated with the multiparameter eigenvalue problem in ordinary differential equations, J. Differ. Equ., 5 (1969), 197-213.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(69)90112-0.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. R. Sampford, Some inequalities on Mill's ratio and related functions, Ann. Math. Stat., 24 (1953), 130-132.  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729093.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

A. AlAzemiF. AlAzemi and A. Boumenir, The approximation of eigencurves by sampling, Sampl. Theory Signal Image Process., 12 (2013), 127-138.   Google Scholar

[2]

M. H. Annaby and R. M. Asharabi, Computing eigenvalues of boundary-value problems using sinc-Gaussian method, Sampl. Theory Signal Image Process., 7 (2008), 293-311.   Google Scholar

[3]

M. H. Annaby and R. M. Asharabi, Computing eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems by Hermite interpolations, Numer. Algor., 60 (2012), 355-367.  doi: 10.1007/s11075-011-9518-x.  Google Scholar

[4]

R. M. Asharabi, A Hermite-Gauss technique for approximating eigenvalues of regular Sturm-Liouville problems, J. Inequal. Appl., (2016), Art. 154. doi: 10.1186/s13660-016-1098-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. M. Asharabi, Generalized bivariate Hermite-Gauss sampling, Comput. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 29. doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0802-z.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. M. Asharabi and J. Prestin, On two-dimensional classical and Hermite sampling, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36 (2016), 851-871.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/drv022.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. M. Asharabi and M. Tharwat, The use of the Generalized sin-Gaussian sampling for numerically computing eigenvalues of Dirac system, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 48 (2018), 373-386.  doi: 10.1553/etna_vol48s373.  Google Scholar

[8]

F. V. Atkinson and A. B. Mingarelli, Multiparameter Eigenvalue Problems, Sturm-Liouville Theory, Vol. 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. A. Binding and P. J. Browne, Asymptotics of eigencurves for second order ordinary differential equations Ⅰ, J. Differ. Equ., 88 (1990), 30-45.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(90)90107-Z.  Google Scholar

[10]

P. A. Binding and P. J. Browne, Asymptotics of eigencurves for second order ordinary differential equations Ⅱ, J. Differ. Equ., 89 (1991), 224-243.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(91)90120-X.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. A. Binding and H. Volkmer, Eigencurves for two-parameter Sturm-Liouville equations, SIAM Rev., 38 (1996), 27-48.  doi: 10.1137/1038002.  Google Scholar

[12]

P. A. Binding and B. A. Watson, An inverse nodal problem for two-parameter Sturm-Liouville systems, Inverse Probl., 25 (2009), Art. 085005. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/8/085005.  Google Scholar

[13]

A. Boumenir and B. Chanane, Eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville systems using sampling theory, Appl. Anal., 62 (1996), 323-334.  doi: 10.1080/00036819608840486.  Google Scholar

[14]

B. Chanane, Computation of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems with parameter dependent boundary conditions using reularized sampling method, Math. Comput., 74 (2005), 1793-1801.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01717-5.  Google Scholar

[15]

B. Chanane and A. Boucherif, Computation of the eigenpairs of two-parameter Sturm-Liouville problems using the regularized sampling method, Abstr. Appl. Anal., (2014), Art. 695303. doi: 10.1155/2014/695303.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. Faierman, The completeness and expansion theorems associated with the multiparameter eigenvalue problem in ordinary differential equations, J. Differ. Equ., 5 (1969), 197-213.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(69)90112-0.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. R. Sampford, Some inequalities on Mill's ratio and related functions, Ann. Math. Stat., 24 (1953), 130-132.  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729093.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The eigencurves in Example 1
Figure 2.  (a) The logarithm of the norm error $ \|(\lambda_{k}^{*},\mu_{k}^{*})-(\lambda_{k,0,20}, \mu_{k,0,20})\|_{\mathbb{R}^{2}} $ for $ k = 1,\ldots,6 $ in Example 1. (b) The logarithm of the norm error $ \|(\lambda_{3}^{*},\mu_{3}^{*})-(\lambda_{3,0,N},\mu_{3,0,N})\|_{\mathbb{R}^{2}} $ for $ N = 10,15,20,25 $ in Example 1
Figure 3.  The eigencurves in Example 2
Figure 4.  The eigencurves in Example 3
Table 1.  Comparisons
Methods Region of approximation Convergence rate
WKS sampling $ [-N,N]^{2} $ $ \ln N/\sqrt{N} $
Regularized sampling $ [-N,N]^{2} $ $ \ln N/N^{m+1/2} $
Sinc-Gaussian sampling $ \prod_{j=1}^{2}[(n_{j}-1/2)h_{j},(n_{j}+1/2)h_{j}] $ $ \mathrm{e}^{-\delta N}/\sqrt{N} $
Methods Region of approximation Convergence rate
WKS sampling $ [-N,N]^{2} $ $ \ln N/\sqrt{N} $
Regularized sampling $ [-N,N]^{2} $ $ \ln N/N^{m+1/2} $
Sinc-Gaussian sampling $ \prod_{j=1}^{2}[(n_{j}-1/2)h_{j},(n_{j}+1/2)h_{j}] $ $ \mathrm{e}^{-\delta N}/\sqrt{N} $
Table 2.  Approximation of eigenpairs with $ h = 1 $
$ k $ $ \lambda_{k,0,15} $ $ \mu_{k,0,15} $
Bivariate WKS sampling
1 1.813797507802172 1.513239555736101
2 3.627597850186581 3.487076569018237
3 5.441403076170987 5.348799863878748
4 7.255208077727408 7.186073252549332
5 9.069006371615362 9.013757735420938
6 10.88280054723645 10.836602869705539
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.813799364683959 1.513231023664942
2 3.627598728958227 3.487043523167927
3 5.441398093112097 5.348720707354780
4 7.255197457187725 7.185950886348564
5 7.255197457187725 9.013695321137181
6 10.882796185506988 10.83675471755794
$ k $ $ \lambda_{k,0,15} $ $ \mu_{k,0,15} $
Bivariate WKS sampling
1 1.813797507802172 1.513239555736101
2 3.627597850186581 3.487076569018237
3 5.441403076170987 5.348799863878748
4 7.255208077727408 7.186073252549332
5 9.069006371615362 9.013757735420938
6 10.88280054723645 10.836602869705539
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.813799364683959 1.513231023664942
2 3.627598728958227 3.487043523167927
3 5.441398093112097 5.348720707354780
4 7.255197457187725 7.185950886348564
5 7.255197457187725 9.013695321137181
6 10.882796185506988 10.83675471755794
Table 3.  The norm error $ \|(\lambda_{k}^{*},\mu_{k}^{*})-(\lambda_{k,0,15},\mu_{k,0,15})\|_{\mathbb{R}^{2}} $
$ k $ Bivariate WKS sampling Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
$ h=1 $ $ h=0.5 $
1 8.73082$ \times 10^{-6} $ 1.00333$ \times 10^{-9} $ 6.94810$ \times 10^{-12} $
2 3.30572$ \times 10^{-5} $ 5.91952$ \times 10^{-10} $ 1.23606$ \times 10^{-11} $
3 7.93134$ \times 10^{-5} $ 4.50801$ \times 10^{-10} $ 3.57188$ \times 10^{-11} $
4 1.22826$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.82605$ \times 10^{-10} $ 2.22197$ \times 10^{-11} $
5 6.31407$ \times 10^{-5} $ 2.54946$ \times 10^{-10} $ 2.27273$ \times 10^{-12} $
6 1.51911$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.33596$ \times 10^{-10} $ 7.64573$ \times 10^{-12} $
$ k $ Bivariate WKS sampling Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
$ h=1 $ $ h=0.5 $
1 8.73082$ \times 10^{-6} $ 1.00333$ \times 10^{-9} $ 6.94810$ \times 10^{-12} $
2 3.30572$ \times 10^{-5} $ 5.91952$ \times 10^{-10} $ 1.23606$ \times 10^{-11} $
3 7.93134$ \times 10^{-5} $ 4.50801$ \times 10^{-10} $ 3.57188$ \times 10^{-11} $
4 1.22826$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.82605$ \times 10^{-10} $ 2.22197$ \times 10^{-11} $
5 6.31407$ \times 10^{-5} $ 2.54946$ \times 10^{-10} $ 2.27273$ \times 10^{-12} $
6 1.51911$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.33596$ \times 10^{-10} $ 7.64573$ \times 10^{-12} $
Table 4.  Approximation of eigenpairs with $ h = 1 $
{$ k $} $ \lambda_{k,0,15} $ $ \mu_{k,0,15} $
Bivariate WKS sampling
1 1.359821568195881 1.584365124779384
2 2.294869574533618 3.950449753437753
3 5.235270180088456 2.129614898841256
4 6.477462750322421 4.683407147326487
5 7.667060430768335 6.932768257873039
6 8.825101408478323 9.106626719982193
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.359811348447286 1.584379611568847
2 2.294859272608290 3.950445447061610
3 5.235258286227501 2.129611255383138
4 6.477390507161662 4.683473685527605
5 7.666946848415846 6.932950168963926
6 8.825213824551480 9.106473269299752
{$ k $} $ \lambda_{k,0,15} $ $ \mu_{k,0,15} $
Bivariate WKS sampling
1 1.359821568195881 1.584365124779384
2 2.294869574533618 3.950449753437753
3 5.235270180088456 2.129614898841256
4 6.477462750322421 4.683407147326487
5 7.667060430768335 6.932768257873039
6 8.825101408478323 9.106626719982193
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.359811348447286 1.584379611568847
2 2.294859272608290 3.950445447061610
3 5.235258286227501 2.129611255383138
4 6.477390507161662 4.683473685527605
5 7.666946848415846 6.932950168963926
6 8.825213824551480 9.106473269299752
Table 5.  The norm error $ \|(\lambda_{k}^{*},\mu_{k}^{*})-(\lambda_{k,0,15},\mu_{k,0,15})\|_{\mathbb{R}^{2}} $ with $ h = 1 $
$ k $ Bivariate WKS sampling Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.77230$ \times 10^{-5} $ 6.16607$ \times 10^{-9} $
2 1.11696$ \times 10^{-5} $ 8.90886$ \times 10^{-9} $
3 1.24318$ \times 10^{-5} $ 7.90168$ \times 10^{-9} $
4 9.82270$ \times 10^{-5} $ 1.60926$ \times 10^{-8} $
5 2.14480$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.13712$ \times 10^{-8} $
6 1.90214$ \times 10^{-4} $ 8.33743$ \times 10^{-9} $
$ k $ Bivariate WKS sampling Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 1.77230$ \times 10^{-5} $ 6.16607$ \times 10^{-9} $
2 1.11696$ \times 10^{-5} $ 8.90886$ \times 10^{-9} $
3 1.24318$ \times 10^{-5} $ 7.90168$ \times 10^{-9} $
4 9.82270$ \times 10^{-5} $ 1.60926$ \times 10^{-8} $
5 2.14480$ \times 10^{-4} $ 2.13712$ \times 10^{-8} $
6 1.90214$ \times 10^{-4} $ 8.33743$ \times 10^{-9} $
Table 6.  Approximation of eigenpairs with $ h = 1 $ and $ \varepsilon = 10^{-8} $
{$ k $} $ \lambda_{k,\varepsilon,15} $ $ \mu_{k,\varepsilon,15} $
[1ex] Bivariate WKS sampling
1 0.515656277786066 0.762177530812667
2 2.051784932534724 2.114071060975086
3 3.478736174942723 3.516120586250193
4 4.893280857549082 4.919999452785837
5 6.303637655607843 6.324376642474745
6 7.712016456380302 7.728978003793143
7 9.119198704295004 9.133705129467295
8 10.525522861700562 10.538515646451458
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 0.515671212590693 0.762173604088073
2 2.051799490194234 2.114068514591409
3 3.478721556147922 3.516123605356794
4 4.893200190982574 4.920011111879944
5 6.303486384409280 6.324392419791860
6 7.711851697945461 7.728986314987891
7 9.119176716920121 9.133693454689087
8 10.525875454418745 10.538468065160703
{$ k $} $ \lambda_{k,\varepsilon,15} $ $ \mu_{k,\varepsilon,15} $
[1ex] Bivariate WKS sampling
1 0.515656277786066 0.762177530812667
2 2.051784932534724 2.114071060975086
3 3.478736174942723 3.516120586250193
4 4.893280857549082 4.919999452785837
5 6.303637655607843 6.324376642474745
6 7.712016456380302 7.728978003793143
7 9.119198704295004 9.133705129467295
8 10.525522861700562 10.538515646451458
Bivariate sinc-Gauss sampling
1 0.515671212590693 0.762173604088073
2 2.051799490194234 2.114068514591409
3 3.478721556147922 3.516123605356794
4 4.893200190982574 4.920011111879944
5 6.303486384409280 6.324392419791860
6 7.711851697945461 7.728986314987891
7 9.119176716920121 9.133693454689087
8 10.525875454418745 10.538468065160703
[1]

Felix Finster, Jürg Fröhlich, Marco Oppio, Claudio F. Paganini. Causal fermion systems and the ETH approach to quantum theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (5) : 1717-1746. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020451

[2]

Valery Y. Glizer. Novel Conditions of Euclidean space controllability for singularly perturbed systems with input delay. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 307-320. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020027

[3]

John Leventides, Costas Poulios, Georgios Alkis Tsiatsios, Maria Livada, Stavros Tsipras, Konstantinos Lefcaditis, Panagiota Sargenti, Aleka Sargenti. Systems theory and analysis of the implementation of non pharmaceutical policies for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021004

[4]

Antonio Rieser. A topological approach to spectral clustering. Foundations of Data Science, 2021  doi: 10.3934/fods.2021005

[5]

Bernold Fiedler, Carlos Rocha, Matthias Wolfrum. Sturm global attractors for $S^1$-equivariant parabolic equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 617-659. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.617

[6]

Guillaume Bal, Wenjia Jing. Homogenization and corrector theory for linear transport in random media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (4) : 1311-1343. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1311

[7]

Zhihua Zhang, Naoki Saito. PHLST with adaptive tiling and its application to antarctic remote sensing image approximation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (1) : 321-337. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.321

[8]

Luke Finlay, Vladimir Gaitsgory, Ivan Lebedev. Linear programming solutions of periodic optimization problems: approximation of the optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 399-413. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.399

[9]

Xianming Liu, Guangyue Han. A Wong-Zakai approximation of stochastic differential equations driven by a general semimartingale. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2499-2508. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020192

[10]

W. Cary Huffman. On the theory of $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear $\mathbb{F}_{q^t}$-codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (3) : 349-378. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.349

[11]

Alina Chertock, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvi${\rm{\check{d}}}$ová, Șeyma Nur Özcan. An asymptotic preserving scheme for kinetic chemotaxis models in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (1) : 195-216. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019009

[12]

Wei Liu, Pavel Krejčí, Guoju Ye. Continuity properties of Prandtl-Ishlinskii operators in the space of regulated functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (10) : 3783-3795. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017190

[13]

Charles Fulton, David Pearson, Steven Pruess. Characterization of the spectral density function for a one-sided tridiagonal Jacobi matrix operator. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 247-257. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.247

[14]

Hong Seng Sim, Wah June Leong, Chuei Yee Chen, Siti Nur Iqmal Ibrahim. Multi-step spectral gradient methods with modified weak secant relation for large scale unconstrained optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (3) : 377-387. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018024

[15]

Wenmin Gong, Guangcun Lu. On coupled Dirac systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (8) : 4329-4346. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017185

[16]

Xiaomao Deng, Xiao-Chuan Cai, Jun Zou. A parallel space-time domain decomposition method for unsteady source inversion problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1069-1091. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1069

[17]

Jianping Gao, Shangjiang Guo, Wenxian Shen. Persistence and time periodic positive solutions of doubly nonlocal Fisher-KPP equations in time periodic and space heterogeneous media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2645-2676. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020199

[18]

Haiyan Wang. Existence and nonexistence of positive radial solutions for quasilinear systems. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 810-817. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.810

[19]

Tuvi Etzion, Alexander Vardy. On $q$-analogs of Steiner systems and covering designs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2011, 5 (2) : 161-176. doi: 10.3934/amc.2011.5.161

[20]

Alberto Bressan, Ke Han, Franco Rampazzo. On the control of non holonomic systems by active constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3329-3353. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3329

2019 Impact Factor: 1.105

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (60)
  • HTML views (76)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]