1995, 1(3): 421-448. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.421

Approximate inertial manifolds of exponential order

1. 

The Institute for Scientific Computing & Applied Mathematics, 618 E. Third St., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States

Received  February 1995 Published  May 1995

A fairly general class of nonlinear evolution equations with a self-adjoint or non self-adjoint linear operator is considered, and a family of approximate inertial manifolds (AIMs) is constructed. Two cases are considered: when the spectral gap condition (SGC) is not satisfied and an exact inertial manifold is not known to exist the construction is such that the AIMs have exponential order, while when the SGC is satisfied (and hence there exists an exact inertial manifold) the construction is such that the AIMs converge exponentially to the exact inertial manifold.
Citation: Ricardo Rosa. Approximate inertial manifolds of exponential order. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1995, 1 (3) : 421-448. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.421
[1]

Nuno Costa Dias, Andrea Posilicano, João Nuno Prata. Self-adjoint, globally defined Hamiltonian operators for systems with boundaries. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (6) : 1687-1706. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1687

[2]

Abdallah El Hamidi, Aziz Hamdouni, Marwan Saleh. On eigenelements sensitivity for compact self-adjoint operators and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (2) : 445-455. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016006

[3]

Norbert Koksch, Stefan Siegmund. Feedback control via inertial manifolds for nonautonomous evolution equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (3) : 917-936. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.917

[4]

Olivier Goubet. Approximate inertial manifolds for a weakly damped nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1997, 3 (4) : 503-530. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.503

[5]

Oscar P. Manley. Some physical considerations attendant to the approximate inertial manifolds for Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (4) : 585-593. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.585

[6]

Wen Deng. Resolvent estimates for a two-dimensional non-self-adjoint operator. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (1) : 547-596. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.547

[7]

Erik Kropat, Silja Meyer-Nieberg, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. Computational networks and systems-homogenization of self-adjoint differential operators in variational form on periodic networks and micro-architectured systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (2) : 139-169. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017010

[8]

Dachun Yang, Sibei Yang. Maximal function characterizations of Musielak-Orlicz-Hardy spaces associated to non-negative self-adjoint operators satisfying Gaussian estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (6) : 2135-2160. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016031

[9]

Rolf Bronstering. Some computational aspects of approximate inertial manifolds and finite differences. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (4) : 417-454. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.417

[10]

A. V. Rezounenko. Inertial manifolds with delay for retarded semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (4) : 829-840. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.829

[11]

Boling Guo, Bixiang Wang. Gevrey regularity and approximate inertial manifolds for the derivative Ginzburg-Landau equation in two spatial dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (4) : 455-466. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.455

[12]

José M. Arrieta, Esperanza Santamaría. Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (10) : 3921-3944. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.3921

[13]

James C. Robinson. Computing inertial manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (4) : 815-833. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.815

[14]

James C. Robinson. Inertial manifolds with and without delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (4) : 813-824. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.813

[15]

A. Debussche, R. Temam. Some new generalizations of inertial manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (4) : 543-558. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.543

[16]

Mohammed Al Horani, Angelo Favini, Hiroki Tanabe. Inverse problems for evolution equations with time dependent operator-coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (3) : 737-744. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016025

[17]

Cung The Anh, Le Van Hieu, Nguyen Thieu Huy. Inertial manifolds for a class of non-autonomous semilinear parabolic equations with finite delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (2) : 483-503. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.483

[18]

Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for the 3D Cahn-Hilliard equations with periodic boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (5) : 2069-2094. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.2069

[19]

Jesenko Vukadinovic. Global dissipativity and inertial manifolds for diffusive burgers equations with low-wavenumber instability. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (1) : 327-341. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.327

[20]

Shouchuan Hu, Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou. Nonlinear Neumann equations driven by a nonhomogeneous differential operator. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1055-1078. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1055

2017 Impact Factor: 1.179

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (3)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]