March  2009, 11(2): 443-457. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.443

The role of processing speed in determining step patterns during directional epitaxy

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, United States

2. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, 121 Ayres Hall, 1403 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States

Received  January 2008 Revised  August 2008 Published  December 2008

We consider the growth of an epitaxial thin film on a continuously supplied substrate using both the Burton-Cabrara-Frank (BCF) mean-field model and kinetic Monte-Carlo (KMC) simulation. Of particular interest are effects due to the finite size of the deposition zone, which is modeled by imposing an up- and downwind adatom density equal to the adatom density on an infinite terrace in equilibrium with a step. For the BCF model, we find this scenario admits a steady-state pattern with a specific number of steps separated by alternating widths. The specific spacing between the steps depends sensitively on the processing speed and on whether the number of steps is odd or even, with the range of velocities admitting an odd number of steps typically much narrower. These predictions are only partially confirmed by KMC simulations, however, with particularly poor agreement for an odd number of steps. To investigate further, we consider alternative KMC simulations with the interactions between random walkers on the terraces neglected so as to conform more closely with the mean field model. The latter simulations also more readily allow one to disable the step detachment mechanism, in which case they agree well with the predictions of the BCF model.
Citation: Michael A. Saum, Tim Schulze. The role of processing speed in determining step patterns during directional epitaxy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (2) : 443-457. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.443
[1]

Guillaume Bal, Ian Langmore, Youssef Marzouk. Bayesian inverse problems with Monte Carlo forward models. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 81-105. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.81

[2]

Giacomo Dimarco. The moment guided Monte Carlo method for the Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2013, 6 (2) : 291-315. doi: 10.3934/krm.2013.6.291

[3]

Jiakou Wang, Margaret J. Slattery, Meghan Henty Hoskins, Shile Liang, Cheng Dong, Qiang Du. Monte carlo simulation of heterotypic cell aggregation in nonlinear shear flow. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (4) : 683-696. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.683

[4]

Michael B. Giles, Kristian Debrabant, Andreas Rössler. Analysis of multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation using the Milstein discretisation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3881-3903. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018335

[5]

Yuan Gao, Hangjie Ji, Jian-Guo Liu, Thomas P. Witelski. A vicinal surface model for epitaxial growth with logarithmic free energy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (10) : 4433-4453. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018170

[6]

Joseph Nebus. The Dirichlet quotient of point vortex interactions on the surface of the sphere examined by Monte Carlo experiments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (1) : 125-136. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.125

[7]

Chjan C. Lim, Joseph Nebus, Syed M. Assad. Monte-Carlo and polyhedron-based simulations I: extremal states of the logarithmic N-body problem on a sphere. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (3) : 313-342. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.313

[8]

Olli-Pekka Tossavainen, Daniel B. Work. Markov Chain Monte Carlo based inverse modeling of traffic flows using GPS data. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (3) : 803-824. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.803

[9]

Mazyar Zahedi-Seresht, Gholam-Reza Jahanshahloo, Josef Jablonsky, Sedighe Asghariniya. A new Monte Carlo based procedure for complete ranking efficient units in DEA models. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (4) : 403-416. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017025

[10]

Reiner Henseler, Michael Herrmann, Barbara Niethammer, Juan J. L. Velázquez. A kinetic model for grain growth. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (4) : 591-617. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.591

[11]

Xiaoming Zheng, Gou Young Koh, Trachette Jackson. A continuous model of angiogenesis: Initiation, extension, and maturation of new blood vessels modulated by vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietins, platelet-derived growth factor-B, and pericytes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 1109-1154. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1109

[12]

Jianhong (Jackie) Shen, Sung Ha Kang. Quantum TV and applications in image processing. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2007, 1 (3) : 557-575. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.557

[13]

Lekbir Afraites, Abdelghafour Atlas, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine. Some class of parabolic systems applied to image processing. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (6) : 1671-1687. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016017

[14]

Yan Jin, Jürgen Jost, Guofang Wang. A new nonlocal variational setting for image processing. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (2) : 415-430. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.415

[15]

Hong Jiang, Wei Deng, Zuowei Shen. Surveillance video processing using compressive sensing. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 201-214. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.201

[16]

Qi Wang, Tianyu Zhang. Kinetic theories for biofilms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (3) : 1027-1059. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1027

[17]

Anatoly N. Kochubei, Yuri Kondratiev. Fractional kinetic hierarchies and intermittency. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (3) : 725-740. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017029

[18]

Michael Herty, Giuseppe Visconti. Kinetic methods for inverse problems. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (5) : 1109-1130. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019042

[19]

Krzysztof Frączek, Leonid Polterovich. Growth and mixing. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (2) : 315-338. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.315

[20]

Karim El Laithy, Martin Bogdan. Synaptic energy drives the information processing mechanisms in spiking neural networks. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 233-256. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.233

2018 Impact Factor: 1.008

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (3)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]