
Previous Article
Existence of traveling wave solutions for a nonlocal reactiondiffusion model of influenza a drift
 DCDSB Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Influence of latent period and nonlinear incidence rate on the dynamics of SIRS epidemiological models
Limit behavior of nonlinear stochastic wave equations with singular perturbation
1.  Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China 
2.  School of Science, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China 
$ \nu $u_{tt}$+u_t=$Δ$u+f(u)+$ε$\dot{W}$
on an open bounded domain $D\subset\R^n$, $1\leq n\leq 3$,, is studied in the sense of distribution for small $\nu, $ε$>0$. Here $\nu$ is the parameter that describes the singular perturbation. First, by a decomposition of Markov semigroup defined by (1), a stationary solution is constructed which describes the asymptotic behavior of solution from initial value in state space $H_0^1(D)\times L^2(D)$. Then a global measure attractor is constructed for (1). Furthermore under the case that the stochastic force is proportional to the square root of singular perturbation, that is ε$=\sqrt{\nu}$, we study the limit of the behavior of all the stationary solutions of (1) as $\nu\rightarrow 0$. It is shown that, by studying a continuity property on $\nu$ for the measure attractors of (1), any one stationary solution of the limit equation
$u_t=$Δ$u+f(u).$
is a limit point of a stationary solution of (1), as $\nu\rightarrow 0$.
[1] 
Petr Kůrka. On the measure attractor of a cellular automaton. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 524535. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.524 
[2] 
Giuseppe Da Prato. An integral inequality for the invariant measure of some finite dimensional stochastic differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2016, 21 (9) : 30153027. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016085 
[3] 
Kai Liu. Stationary solutions of neutral stochastic partial differential equations with delays in the highestorder derivatives. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2018, 23 (9) : 39153934. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018117 
[4] 
Arnulf Jentzen. Taylor expansions of solutions of stochastic partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2010, 14 (2) : 515557. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.515 
[5] 
Neil S. Trudinger, XuJia Wang. Quasilinear elliptic equations with signed measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 477494. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.477 
[6] 
Ugo Bessi. The stochastic value function in metric measure spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2017, 37 (4) : 18191839. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017076 
[7] 
Mieczysław Cichoń, Bianca Satco. On the properties of solutions set for measure driven differential inclusions. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 287296. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0287 
[8] 
Elena Goncharova, Maxim Staritsyn. On BVextension of asymptotically constrained controlaffine systems and complementarity problem for measure differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2018, 11 (6) : 10611070. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018061 
[9] 
Tomás Caraballo, José Real, T. Taniguchi. The exponential stability of neutral stochastic delay partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2007, 18 (2&3) : 295313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.18.295 
[10] 
Zhongkai Guo. Invariant foliations for stochastic partial differential equations with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2015, 35 (11) : 52035219. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5203 
[11] 
Kexue Li, Jigen Peng, Junxiong Jia. Explosive solutions of parabolic stochastic partial differential equations with lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2017, 37 (10) : 51055125. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017221 
[12] 
Mogtaba Mohammed, Mamadou Sango. Homogenization of nonlinear hyperbolic stochastic partial differential equations with nonlinear damping and forcing. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (2) : 341369. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019014 
[13] 
Minoo Kamrani. Numerical solution of partial differential equations with stochastic Neumann boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2017, 22 (11) : 118. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019061 
[14] 
Sergio Albeverio, Sonia Mazzucchi. Infinite dimensional integrals and partial differential equations for stochastic and quantum phenomena. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (2) : 123137. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019006 
[15] 
Marco Degiovanni, Michele Scaglia. A variational approach to semilinear elliptic equations with measure data. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2011, 31 (4) : 12331248. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1233 
[16] 
YingCheng Lai, Kwangho Park. Noisesensitive measure for stochastic resonance in biological oscillators. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (4) : 583602. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.583 
[17] 
Yan Wang, Guanggan Chen. Invariant measure of stochastic fractional Burgers equation with degenerate noise on a bounded interval. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 31213135. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019140 
[18] 
Huyuan Chen, Hichem Hajaiej, Ying Wang. Boundary blowup solutions to fractional elliptic equations in a measure framework. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2016, 36 (4) : 18811903. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1881 
[19] 
Verena Bögelein, Frank Duzaar, Ugo Gianazza. Very weak solutions of singular porous medium equations with measure data. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (1) : 2349. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.23 
[20] 
Leonardi Filippo. A projection method for the computation of admissible measure valued solutions of the incompressible Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2018, 11 (5) : 941961. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018056 
2017 Impact Factor: 0.972
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]