American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2017, 10(1): 119-139. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017007

Rigidity of three-dimensional lattices and dimension reduction in heterogeneous nanowires

Giuliano Lazzaroni 1, , Mariapia Palombaro 2, and  Anja Schlömerkemper 3,

1. 

SISSA, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
2. 

University of Sussex, Department of Mathematics, Pevensey 2 Building, Falmer Campus, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
3. 

University of Würzburg, Institute of Mathematics, Emil-Fischer-Straße 40, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Received  January 2015 Revised  July 2015 Published  December 2016

Fund Project: This work was partially supported by the DFG grant SCHL 1706/2-1. The research of G.L. was supported by the ERC grant No. 290888

In the context of nanowire heterostructures we perform a discrete to continuum limit of the corresponding free energy by means of Γ-convergence techniques. Nearest neighbours are identified by employing the notions of Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay triangulations. The scaling of the nanowire is done in such a way that we perform not only a continuum limit but a dimension reduction simultaneously. The main part of the proof is a discrete geometric rigidity result that we announced in an earlier work and show here in detail for a variety of three-dimensional lattices. We perform the passage from discrete to continuum twice: once for a system that compensates a lattice mismatch between two parts of the heterogeneous nanowire without defects and once for a system that creates dislocations. It turns out that we can verify the experimentally observed fact that the nanowires show dislocations when the radius of the specimen is large.

Keywords: Nonlinear elasticity, discrete to continuum, dimension reduction, Rod theory, geometric rigidity, non-interpenetration, Gamma-convergence, crystals, dislocations, heterostructures.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 74B20, 70G75, 49J45; Secondary: 74K10, 74N05.
Citation: Giuliano Lazzaroni, Mariapia Palombaro, Anja Schlömerkemper. Rigidity of three-dimensional lattices and dimension reduction in heterogeneous nanowires. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (1) : 119-139. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017007
References:
[1]

R. Alicandro, G. Lazzaroni and M. Palombaro, Derivation of a rod theory from lattice systems with interactions beyond nearest neighbours Preprint SISSA 58/2016/MATE.Google Scholar

[2]

A. Braides, M. Solci and E. Vitali, A derivation of linear elastic energies from pair-interaction atomistic systems, Netw. Heterog. Media, 2 (2007), 551-567. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.551. Google Scholar

[3]

E. Ertekin, P. A. Greaney, D. C. Chrzan and T. D. Sands, Equilibrium limits of coherency in strained nanowire heterostructures, J. Appl. Phys., 97 (2005), 114325. Google Scholar

[4]

S. Fanzon, M. Palombaro and M. Ponsiglione, A variational model for dislocations at semi-coherent interfaces, Preprint arXiv: 1512. 03795 (2015).Google Scholar

[5]

L. Flatley and F. Theil, Face-centered cubic crystallization of atomistic configurations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218 (2015), 363-416. doi: 10.1007/s00205-015-0862-1. Google Scholar

[6]

G. Friesecke, R. D. James and S. Müller, A theorem on geometric rigidity and the derivation of nonlinear plate theory from three-dimensional elasticity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 55 (2002), 1461-1506. doi: 10.1002/cpa.10048. Google Scholar

[7]

G. Friesecke and F. Theil, Validity and failure of the Cauchy-Born Hypothesis in a two-dimensional mass-spring lattice, J. Nonlinear Sci., 12 (2002), 445-478. doi: 10.1007/s00332-002-0495-z. Google Scholar

[8] G. Grosso and G. Pastori Parravicini, Solid State Physics, 2nd edition, Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, 2014. Google Scholar
[9]

P. M. Gruber and J. M. Willis, eds. , Handbook of Convex Geometry, Volume A. , Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. , North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993.Google Scholar

[10]

K. L. Kavanagh, Misfit dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 25 (2010), 024006. Google Scholar

[11]

G. Lazzaroni, M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper, A discrete to continuum analysis of dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Commun. Math. Sci., 13 (2015), 1105-1133. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2015.v13.n5.a3. Google Scholar

[12]

G. Lazzaroni, M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper, Dislocations in nanowire heterostructures: From discrete to continuum, Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., 13 (2013), 541-544. Google Scholar

[13]

S. Müller and M. Palombaro, Derivation of a rod theory for biphase materials with dislocations at the interface, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 48 (2013), 315-335. doi: 10.1007/s00526-012-0552-x. Google Scholar

[14]

B. Schmidt, A derivation of continuum nonlinear plate theory from atomistic models, Multiscale Model. Simul., 5 (2006), 664-694. doi: 10.1137/050646251. Google Scholar

[15]

V. Schmidt, J. V. Wittemann and U. Gösele, Growth, thermodynamics, and electrical properties of silicon nanowires, Chem. Rev., 110 (2010), 361-388. Google Scholar

[16]

F. Theil, A proof of crystallization in two dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys., 262 (2006), 209-236. doi: 10.1007/s00220-005-1458-7. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

R. Alicandro, G. Lazzaroni and M. Palombaro, Derivation of a rod theory from lattice systems with interactions beyond nearest neighbours Preprint SISSA 58/2016/MATE.Google Scholar

[2]

A. Braides, M. Solci and E. Vitali, A derivation of linear elastic energies from pair-interaction atomistic systems, Netw. Heterog. Media, 2 (2007), 551-567. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.551. Google Scholar

[3]

E. Ertekin, P. A. Greaney, D. C. Chrzan and T. D. Sands, Equilibrium limits of coherency in strained nanowire heterostructures, J. Appl. Phys., 97 (2005), 114325. Google Scholar

[4]

S. Fanzon, M. Palombaro and M. Ponsiglione, A variational model for dislocations at semi-coherent interfaces, Preprint arXiv: 1512. 03795 (2015).Google Scholar

[5]

L. Flatley and F. Theil, Face-centered cubic crystallization of atomistic configurations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218 (2015), 363-416. doi: 10.1007/s00205-015-0862-1. Google Scholar

[6]

G. Friesecke, R. D. James and S. Müller, A theorem on geometric rigidity and the derivation of nonlinear plate theory from three-dimensional elasticity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 55 (2002), 1461-1506. doi: 10.1002/cpa.10048. Google Scholar

[7]

G. Friesecke and F. Theil, Validity and failure of the Cauchy-Born Hypothesis in a two-dimensional mass-spring lattice, J. Nonlinear Sci., 12 (2002), 445-478. doi: 10.1007/s00332-002-0495-z. Google Scholar

[8] G. Grosso and G. Pastori Parravicini, Solid State Physics, 2nd edition, Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, 2014. Google Scholar
[9]

P. M. Gruber and J. M. Willis, eds. , Handbook of Convex Geometry, Volume A. , Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. , North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993.Google Scholar

[10]

K. L. Kavanagh, Misfit dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 25 (2010), 024006. Google Scholar

[11]

G. Lazzaroni, M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper, A discrete to continuum analysis of dislocations in nanowire heterostructures, Commun. Math. Sci., 13 (2015), 1105-1133. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2015.v13.n5.a3. Google Scholar

[12]

G. Lazzaroni, M. Palombaro and A. Schlömerkemper, Dislocations in nanowire heterostructures: From discrete to continuum, Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., 13 (2013), 541-544. Google Scholar

[13]

S. Müller and M. Palombaro, Derivation of a rod theory for biphase materials with dislocations at the interface, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 48 (2013), 315-335. doi: 10.1007/s00526-012-0552-x. Google Scholar

[14]

B. Schmidt, A derivation of continuum nonlinear plate theory from atomistic models, Multiscale Model. Simul., 5 (2006), 664-694. doi: 10.1137/050646251. Google Scholar

[15]

V. Schmidt, J. V. Wittemann and U. Gösele, Growth, thermodynamics, and electrical properties of silicon nanowires, Chem. Rev., 110 (2010), 361-388. Google Scholar

[16]

F. Theil, A proof of crystallization in two dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys., 262 (2006), 209-236. doi: 10.1007/s00220-005-1458-7. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  In the face-centred cubic lattice the nearest-neighbour structure of the atoms provides a subdivision of the space into tetrahedra (A) and octahedra (B). Figure (C) shows a quarter of an octahedron in the same unit cell. Grey dots denote points lying on the hidden facets
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The hexagonal close-packed lattice is associated with a tessellation of tetrahedra and octahedra as the ones in the figure. Only some of the bonds and some of the polyhedra of the pretriangulation are displayed
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The body-centred cubic lattice is associated with a tessellation of irregular tetrahedra as the one in the figure
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Cubic cell in the diamond lattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}$. Atoms from the sublattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_1$ are represented in black/grey, while white atoms are from the sublattice $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_2$. Nearest-neighbour bonds are displayed by solid thick lines. Moreover, the picture shows a tetrahedron from the Delaunay pretriangulation of $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}_1$: its edges (solid and dashed thin lines) correspond to next-to-nearest neighbours in $\mathcal{L}^{\rm{D}}$. A white atom lies at the barycentre of the tetrahedron, which is further divided into four irregular tetrahedra by the bonds between the barycentre and each vertex
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Bonds and triangulation in a honeycomb lattice. The lattice is given by $\mathcal{L}^✡:=\mathcal{L}^✡_1 \cup \mathcal{L}^✡_2$, where $\mathcal{L}^✡_i:={\rm{u}}_i^✡ + \xi_1{\rm{v}}^✡_1+\xi_2{\rm{v}}^✡_2 \colon \ \xi_1,\xi_2 \in\mathbb{Z}\}$, ${\rm{v}}^✡_1:=(1,0)$, ${\rm{v}}^✡_2:=(\frac12,\frac{\sqrt3}2)$, ${\rm{u}}^✡_1:=(0,0)$, ${\rm{u}}^✡_2:=(0,\frac{\sqrt3}3)$. This results into two interpenetrating sublattices $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$, both being hexagonal (i.e., equilateral triangular). Atoms from $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$ are displayed in different colors in the picture, respectively in black and in white. In the left part of the figure we indicate nearest neighbour (solid) and next-to-nearest neighbour bonds (dashed lines). The right part of the figure shows a possible triangulation, that is the natural triangulation of $\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ enriched by considering the nearest-neighbour bonds between atoms $x\in\mathcal{L}^✡_1$ and $y\in\mathcal{L}^✡_2$. This corresponds to ignoring the bonds between atoms of $\mathcal{L}^✡_2$, cf. Section 2.3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  By cutting a cubic lattice along certain transverse planes, one finds two-dimensional hexagonal Bravais lattices. (A) face-centred; (B) body-centred
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Dislocations in a honeycomb-type lattice. The bonds at the interface are chosen in the following way: First one considers only black atoms and finds a Delaunay pretriangulation, which is then refined to a triangulation (dashed lines); the same is done for white atoms (dotted lines). The dashed and dotted lines thus obtained give the bonds between next-to-nearest neighbours. Finally, each white (resp. black) atom lying inside a triangle formed by three black (resp. white) atoms is connected to the vertices of that triangle by nearest-neighbour bonds (solid lines)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  The tetrahedron $\mathcal S$ and its image $F(\mathcal S)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  The octahedron $\mathcal O$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  (A) The image of $\mathcal{O}$ through a piece-wise affine map $u$ such that $l_i=1$ for each $i\neq 3$. (B) The projection of $u(\mathcal{O})$ on the plane $p$, where $O=\Pi(Q_1)=\Pi(Q_4)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Gianni Dal Maso, Giuliano Lazzaroni. Crack growth with non-interpenetration: A simplified proof for the pure Neumann problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1219-1231. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1219
[2]

Sylvia Serfaty. Gamma-convergence of gradient flows on Hilbert and metric spaces and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1427-1451. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1427
[3]

Marco Cicalese, Antonio DeSimone, Caterina Ida Zeppieri. Discrete-to-continuum limits for strain-alignment-coupled systems: Magnetostrictive solids, ferroelectric crystals and nematic elastomers. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (4) : 667-708. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.667
[4]

Raz Kupferman, Cy Maor. The emergence of torsion in the continuum limit of distributed edge-dislocations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (3) : 361-387. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.361
[5]

Manuel Friedrich, Bernd Schmidt. On a discrete-to-continuum convergence result for a two dimensional brittle material in the small displacement regime. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (2) : 321-342. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.321
[6]

Mads R. Bisgaard. Mather theory and symplectic rigidity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 15: 165-207. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019018
[7]

Julian Braun, Bernd Schmidt. On the passage from atomistic systems to nonlinear elasticity theory for general multi-body potentials with p-growth. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (4) : 879-912. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.879
[8]

Gianni Dal Maso. Ennio De Giorgi and $\mathbf\Gamma$-convergence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1017-1021. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1017
[9]

Alexander Mielke. Deriving amplitude equations via evolutionary $\Gamma$-convergence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (6) : 2679-2700. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2679
[10]

Roberto Alicandro, Giuliano Lazzaroni, Mariapia Palombaro. Derivation of a rod theory from lattice systems with interactions beyond nearest neighbours. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (1) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018001
[11]

Ning Zhang, Qiang Wu. Online learning for supervised dimension reduction. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2019, 2 (2) : 95-106. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2019008
[12]

Sanda Cleja-Ţigoiu, Raisa Paşcan. Non-local elasto-viscoplastic models with dislocations and non-Schmid effect. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (6) : 1621-1639. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1621
[13]

Luis Barreira. Dimension theory of flows: A survey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (10) : 3345-3362. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.3345
[14]

Gabriella Bretti, Ciro D’Apice, Rosanna Manzo, Benedetto Piccoli. A continuum-discrete model for supply chains dynamics. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (4) : 661-694. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.661
[15]

Simone Farinelli. Geometric arbitrage theory and market dynamics. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (4) : 431-471. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.431
[16]

Andrew D. Lewis, David R. Tyner. Geometric Jacobian linearization and LQR theory. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2010, 2 (4) : 397-440. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2010.2.397
[17]

Ulrike Kant, Werner M. Seiler. Singularities in the geometric theory of differential equations. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 784-793. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.784
[18]

Anas Eskif, Julio C. Rebelo. Global rigidity of conjugations for locally non-discrete subgroups of $ {\rm {Diff}}^{\omega} (S^1) $. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 15: 41-93. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019013
[19]

Lucia Scardia, Anja Schlömerkemper, Chiara Zanini. Towards uniformly $\Gamma$-equivalent theories for nonconvex discrete systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (2) : 661-686. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.661
[20]

Martin Kružík, Ulisse Stefanelli, Chiara Zanini. Quasistatic evolution of magnetoelastic plates via dimension reduction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (12) : 5999-6013. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5999

2018 Impact Factor: 0.545

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (22)
  • HTML views (100)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences