# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

February  2012, 6(1): 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133

## The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule

 1 Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200135, China 2 LMAM, School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received  February 2011 Revised  September 2011 Published  February 2012

The Landweber scheme is widely used in various image reconstruction problems. In previous works, $\alpha,\beta$-rule is suggested to stop the Landweber iteration so as to get proper iteration results. The order of convergence of discrepancy principal (DP rule), which is a special case of $\alpha,\beta$-rule, with constant relaxation coefficient $\lambda$ satisfying $0<\lambda\sigma_1^2<1,~(\|A\|_{V,W}=\sigma_1>0)$ has been studied. A sufficient condition for convergence of Landweber scheme is that the value $\lambda_m\sigma_1^2$ should be lied in a closed interval, i.e. $0<\varepsilon\leq\lambda_m\sigma_1^2\leq2-\varepsilon$, $(0<\varepsilon<1)$. In this paper, we mainly investigate the order of convergence of the $\alpha,\beta$-rule with variable relaxation coefficient $\lambda_m$ satisfying $0 < \varepsilon\leq\lambda_m \sigma_1^2 \leq 2-\varepsilon$. According to the order of convergence, we can conclude that $\alpha,\beta$-rule is the optimal rule for the Landweber scheme.
Citation: Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Matania Ben–Artzi, Joseph Falcovitz, Jiequan Li. The convergence of the GRP scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 1-27. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.1 [2] Maurizio Grasselli, Morgan Pierre. Convergence to equilibrium of solutions of the backward Euler scheme for asymptotically autonomous second-order gradient-like systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (6) : 2393-2416. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.2393 [3] Josef Diblík, Klara Janglajew, Mária Kúdelčíková. An explicit coefficient criterion for the existence of positive solutions to the linear advanced equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2461-2467. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2461 [4] Stefan Kindermann, Andreas Neubauer. On the convergence of the quasioptimality criterion for (iterated) Tikhonov regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 291-299. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.291 [5] Jiann-Sheng Jiang, Kung-Hwang Kuo, Chi-Kun Lin. Homogenization of second order equation with spatial dependent coefficient. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 12 (2) : 303-313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.303 [6] Benoît Merlet, Morgan Pierre. Convergence to equilibrium for the backward Euler scheme and applications. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (3) : 685-702. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.685 [7] Ting-Hao Hsu, Gail S. K. Wolkowicz. A criterion for the existence of relaxation oscillations with applications to predator-prey systems and an epidemic model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (4) : 1257-1277. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019219 [8] François Dubois. Third order equivalent equation of lattice Boltzmann scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 221-248. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.221 [9] Bertram Düring, Daniel Matthes, Josipa Pina Milišić. A gradient flow scheme for nonlinear fourth order equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (3) : 935-959. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.935 [10] Desmond J. Higham, Xuerong Mao, Lukasz Szpruch. Convergence, non-negativity and stability of a new Milstein scheme with applications to finance. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (8) : 2083-2100. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2083 [11] Bahareh Akhtari, Esmail Babolian, Andreas Neuenkirch. An Euler scheme for stochastic delay differential equations on unbounded domains: Pathwise convergence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (1) : 23-38. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.23 [12] Xinfu Chen, Bei Hu, Jin Liang, Yajing Zhang. Convergence rate of free boundary of numerical scheme for American option. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (5) : 1435-1444. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016004 [13] Matúš Tibenský, Angela Handlovičová. Convergence analysis of the discrete duality finite volume scheme for the regularised Heston model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020226 [14] Hedy Attouch, Alexandre Cabot, Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Rate of convergence of inertial gradient dynamics with time-dependent viscous damping coefficient. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (3) : 353-371. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018018 [15] Harbir Antil, Mahamadi Warma. Optimal control of the coefficient for the regional fractional $p$-Laplace equation: Approximation and convergence. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (1) : 1-38. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019001 [16] Huijiang Zhao, Yinchuan Zhao. Convergence to strong nonlinear rarefaction waves for global smooth solutions of $p-$system with relaxation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (5) : 1243-1262. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1243 [17] Wenqing Bao, Xianyi Wu, Xian Zhou. Optimal stopping problems with restricted stopping times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 399-411. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016023 [18] Anna Maria Cherubini, Giorgio Metafune, Francesco Paparella. On the stopping time of a bouncing ball. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (1) : 43-72. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.43 [19] Maike Schulte, Anton Arnold. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrodinger equation -- a compact higher order scheme. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (1) : 101-125. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.101 [20] Yongchao Liu, Hailin Sun, Huifu Xu. An approximation scheme for stochastic programs with second order dominance constraints. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (4) : 473-490. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016021

2018 Impact Factor: 1.469