October  2008, 4(4): 685-696. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.685

On the sensitivity of desirability functions for multiresponse optimization

1. 

Department of Industrial Engineering, ISIK University, Istanbul 34980, Turkey

Received  May 2007 Revised  June 2008 Published  November 2008

Desirability functions have been one of the most important multiresponse optimization technique since the early eighties. Main reasons for this popularity might be counted as the convenience of the implementation of the method and it's availability in many experimental design software packages. Technique itself involves somehow subjective parameters such as the importance coefficients between response characteristics that are used to calculate overall desirability, weights used in determining the shape of each individual response and the size of the specification band of the response. However, the impact of these sensitive parameters on the solution set is mostly uninvestigated. This paper proposes a procedure to analyze the sensitivity of the important characteristic parameters of desirability functions and their impact on pareto-optimal solution set. The proposed procedure uses the experimental design tools on the solution space and estimates a prediction equation on the overall desirability to identify the sensitive parameters. For illustration, a classical desirability example is selected from the literature and results are given along with the discussion.
Citation: Caglar S. Aksezer. On the sensitivity of desirability functions for multiresponse optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 685-696. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.685
[1]

Behrouz Kheirfam, Kamal mirnia. Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis in piecewise linear fractional programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (2) : 343-351. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.343

[2]

Jaroslaw Smieja, Malgorzata Kardynska, Arkadiusz Jamroz. The meaning of sensitivity functions in signaling pathways analysis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2697-2707. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2697

[3]

Behrouz Kheirfam. Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis of the constraint matrix in piecewise linear fractional programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (2) : 347-361. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.347

[4]

Qilin Wang, S. J. Li. Higher-order sensitivity analysis in nonconvex vector optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (2) : 381-392. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.381

[5]

Alireza Ghaffari Hadigheh, Tamás Terlaky. Generalized support set invariancy sensitivity analysis in linear optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (1) : 1-18. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.1

[6]

Zhenhua Peng, Zhongping Wan, Weizhi Xiong. Sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under strictly minimal efficiency. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 427-436. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017022

[7]

Behrouz Kheirfam, Kamal mirnia. Comments on ''Generalized support set invariancy sensitivity analysis in linear optimization''. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (3) : 611-616. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.611

[8]

Yihong Xu, Zhenhua Peng. Higher-order sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under Henig efficiency. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 313-327. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016019

[9]

Krzysztof Fujarewicz, Krzysztof Łakomiec. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of a tumor growth model and its application to spatiotemporal radiotherapy optimization. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1131-1142. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016034

[10]

Guoqiang Wang, Zhongchen Wu, Zhongtuan Zheng, Xinzhong Cai. Complexity analysis of primal-dual interior-point methods for semidefinite optimization based on a parametric kernel function with a trigonometric barrier term. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (2) : 101-113. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.101

[11]

Shengji Li, Chunmei Liao, Minghua Li. Stability analysis of parametric variational systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (2) : 317-331. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.317

[12]

Jiawei Chen, Guangmin Wang, Xiaoqing Ou, Wenyan Zhang. Continuity of solutions mappings of parametric set optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-12. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018138

[13]

Yuji Harata, Yoshihisa Banno, Kouichi Taji. Parametric excitation based bipedal walking: Control method and optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 171-190. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.171

[14]

Kazimierz Malanowski, Helmut Maurer. Sensitivity analysis for state constrained optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (2) : 241-272. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.241

[15]

Ruotian Gao, Wenxun Xing. Robust sensitivity analysis for linear programming with ellipsoidal perturbation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019041

[16]

Ian D. Morris. Ergodic optimization for generic continuous functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (1) : 383-388. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.383

[17]

H.Thomas Banks, Danielle Robbins, Karyn L. Sutton. Theoretical foundations for traditional and generalized sensitivity functions for nonlinear delay differential equations. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1301-1333. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1301

[18]

Qi Wang, Jingyue Yang, Feng Yu. Boundedness in logistic Keller-Segel models with nonlinear diffusion and sensitivity functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (9) : 5021-5036. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017216

[19]

Pooja Louhan, S. K. Suneja. On fractional vector optimization over cones with support functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 549-572. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016031

[20]

Zhongliang Deng, Enwen Hu. Error minimization with global optimization for difference of convex functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 1027-1033. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019070

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (10)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]