# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

October  2017, 13(4): 1661-1683. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017012

## Optimal ordering policy for a two-warehouse inventory model use of two-level trade credit

 1 Department of Business Administration, Chihlee University of Technology, Banqiao District, New Taipei City, 22050, Taiwan 2 Department of Business Administration, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33306, Taiwan 3 Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, St. John's University, Tamsui District, New Taipei City, 25135, Taiwan 4 Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung, 41349, Taiwan

* Corresponding author: liaojj@mail.chihlee.edu.tw

Received  November 2013 Revised  October 02, 2016 Published  December 2016

In today's competitive markets, the supplier let the buyer to pay the purchasing cost after receiving the items, this strategy motivates the retailer to buy more items from the supplier and gains some benefit from the money which they did not pay at the time of receiving of the items. However, the retailer will be unable to pay off the debt obligations to the supplier in the future, so this study extends Yen et al. (2012) to consider the above situation and assumes the retailer can either pay off all accounts at the end of the delay period or delay incurring interest charges on the unpaid and overdue balance due to the difference between interest earned and interest charged. We will discuss the explorations of the function behaviors of the objection function to demonstrate the retailer's optimal replenishment cycle time not only exists but also is unique. Finally, numerical examples are given to illustrate the theorems and gained managerial insights.

Citation: Jui-Jung Liao, Wei-Chun Lee, Kuo-Nan Huang, Yung-Fu Huang. Optimal ordering policy for a two-warehouse inventory model use of two-level trade credit. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1661-1683. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017012
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The interest charged when $W^* < T$
The total accumulation of interest earned when $0<T\le N$
The total accumulation of interest earned when $N<T\le M$
The total accumulation of interest earned when $M<T\le W^{\ast }$
The total accumulation of interest earned when W*T
The ordering policy by using Theorem 1
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{1}$ $\Delta_{2}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 $A2$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.115000 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 $A3$ 100 0.010 5 20 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0800 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.9999$ 1521.51 $B1$ 100 0.002 10 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 502.332 $B2$ 100 0.002 5 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0901 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 1002.30 $B3$ 100 0.002 4 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.1126 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3110$ 1102.80 $C1$ 100 0.010 10 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.03000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{3}^{*}=0.0190$ 501.880 $C2$ 100 0.010 5 10 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0400 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0300$ 499.948 $C3$ 100 0.010 5 16 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0640 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0871$ 1101.50 $D1$ 100 0.014 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0175$ 98.3643 $D2$ 100 0.090 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0420$ 95.8097
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{1}$ $\Delta_{2}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 $A2$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.115000 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 $A3$ 100 0.010 5 20 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0800 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.9999$ 1521.51 $B1$ 100 0.002 10 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 502.332 $B2$ 100 0.002 5 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0901 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 1002.30 $B3$ 100 0.002 4 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.1126 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3110$ 1102.80 $C1$ 100 0.010 10 15 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.03000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{3}^{*}=0.0190$ 501.880 $C2$ 100 0.010 5 10 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0400 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0300$ 499.948 $C3$ 100 0.010 5 16 0.9 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.020000 1.65 0.0165 0.0640 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0871$ 1101.50 $D1$ 100 0.014 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0175$ 98.3643 $D2$ 100 0.090 1 2 1.0 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0420$ 95.8097
The optimal ordering policy by using Theorem 2
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{6}$ $\Delta_{7}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 35 2 1 3 3.5 3.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.9090 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1952$ 50.7661 $A2$ 500 3 10 20.8 1.12 1.118 0.20 0.21 0.123 0.300 100 0.2 0.6397 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1036$ 5716.50 $A3$ 300 3 10 24 1.12 1.118 0.20 0.21 0.300 0.400 100 0.3333 0.9768 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=1.0000$ 4330.40 $B1$ 35 1 5 8 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.4848 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.2208$ 99.9341 $B2$ 35 2 5 8 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.4848 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.0169$ 95.9332 $B3$ 37 1.4 10 20.8 1.12 1.11 0.20 0.21 0.120 0.179 6 0.1622 0.3760 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3796$ 399.6874 $C1$ 250 10 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{3}^{*}=0.2230$ 1206.30 $C2$ 250 30 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.3510$ 1132.50 $C3$ 37 1 9 18 1.12 1.10 0.20 0.21 0.160 0.179 6 0.1622 0.3593 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3629$ 330.0850 $D1$ 250 100 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.5570$ 782.8170 $D2$ 250 160 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.6838$ 881.6120
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{6}$ $\Delta_{7}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 35 2 1 3 3.5 3.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.9090 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1952$ 50.7661 $A2$ 500 3 10 20.8 1.12 1.118 0.20 0.21 0.123 0.300 100 0.2 0.6397 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1036$ 5716.50 $A3$ 300 3 10 24 1.12 1.118 0.20 0.21 0.300 0.400 100 0.3333 0.9768 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=1.0000$ 4330.40 $B1$ 35 1 5 8 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.4848 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.2208$ 99.9341 $B2$ 35 2 5 8 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 10 0.2857 0.4848 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.0169$ 95.9332 $B3$ 37 1.4 10 20.8 1.12 1.11 0.20 0.21 0.120 0.179 6 0.1622 0.3760 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3796$ 399.6874 $C1$ 250 10 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{3}^{*}=0.2230$ 1206.30 $C2$ 250 30 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.3510$ 1132.50 $C3$ 37 1 9 18 1.12 1.10 0.20 0.21 0.160 0.179 6 0.1622 0.3593 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3629$ 330.0850 $D1$ 250 100 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.5570$ 782.8170 $D2$ 250 160 5 10 3.00 1.00 0.12 0.15 0.200 0.300 50 0.2000 0.6060 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.6838$ 881.6120
The optimal ordering policy by using Theorem 3
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{9}$ $\Delta_{10}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $\Delta_{8}$ $\Delta_{6}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 50 0.2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0894$ 144.3954 $A2$ 50 0.3 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1053$ 97.6279 $B1$ 50 0.4 3 6 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.15 10 0.2000 0.3007 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1265$ 142.3945 $B2$ 50 0.7 7 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{7}^{*}=0.1590$ 93.3635 $B3$ 50 0.85 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{7}^{*}=0.1680$ 92.4482 $C1$ 49 1 5 7 1.5 1.2 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.20 10 0.2041 0.2803 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1844$ 87.5672 $C2$ 50 1.2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.19 10 0.2000 0.2682 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1751$ 91.8729 $C3$ 50 1.5 5 7 3 1 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.2100$ 89.2023 $D1$ 50 0.01 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.08 5 0.1000 0.1605 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0447$ 503.1528 $D2$ 50 0.1 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.08 5 0.1000 0.1605 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.1901$ 502.4800 $D3$ 50 2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.2237$ 86.8978
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{9}$ $\Delta_{10}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $\Delta_{8}$ $\Delta_{6}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 50 0.2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0894$ 144.3954 $A2$ 50 0.3 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1053$ 97.6279 $B1$ 50 0.4 3 6 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.15 10 0.2000 0.3007 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1265$ 142.3945 $B2$ 50 0.7 7 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{7}^{*}=0.1590$ 93.3635 $B3$ 50 0.85 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{7}^{*}=0.1680$ 92.4482 $C1$ 49 1 5 7 1.5 1.2 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.20 10 0.2041 0.2803 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1844$ 87.5672 $C2$ 50 1.2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.19 10 0.2000 0.2682 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1751$ 91.8729 $C3$ 50 1.5 5 7 3 1 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.2100$ 89.2023 $D1$ 50 0.01 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.08 5 0.1000 0.1605 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0447$ 503.1528 $D2$ 50 0.1 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.08 5 0.1000 0.1605 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.1901$ 502.4800 $D3$ 50 2 5 7 3 1 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.15 10 0.2000 0.2111 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.2237$ 86.8978
The optimal ordering policy by using Theorem 4
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{9}$ $\Delta_{11}$ $\Delta_{12}$ $\Delta_{8}$ $\Delta_{6}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 30 0.020 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.18 10 0.33 0.2412 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1140$ 30.4546 $A2$ 30 0.030 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.18 10 0.33 0.2412 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1320$ 30.2946 $B1$ 30 0.010 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0816$ 30.1871 $B2$ 30 0.040 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1524$ 29.9407 $B3$ 30 0.125 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.2408$ 29.5262 $C1$ 50 0.010 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.3740$ 504.7746 $C2$ 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4420$ 503.5738 $C3$ 50 1.000 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.5030$ 502.5159 $D1$ 50 0.050 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3774$ 504.6673 $D2$ 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4330$ 503.5567 $D3$ 50 0.800 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4663$ 502.8894
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{9}$ $\Delta_{11}$ $\Delta_{12}$ $\Delta_{8}$ $\Delta_{6}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ $A1$ 30 0.020 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.18 10 0.33 0.2412 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.1140$ 30.4546 $A2$ 30 0.030 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.18 10 0.33 0.2412 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1320$ 30.2946 $B1$ 30 0.010 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0816$ 30.1871 $B2$ 30 0.040 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{6}^{*}=0.1524$ 29.9407 $B3$ 30 0.125 3 4 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.18 10 0.33 0.2408 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.2408$ 29.5262 $C1$ 50 0.010 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.3740$ 504.7746 $C2$ 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4420$ 503.5738 $C3$ 50 1.000 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 80 1.6 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.5030$ 502.5159 $D1$ 50 0.050 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3774$ 504.6673 $D2$ 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4330$ 503.5567 $D3$ 50 0.800 10 20 0.25 0.2 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4663$ 502.8894
Sensitivity analysis with respect to parameters $A$, $C$ and $W$
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{1}$ $\Delta_{2}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 100 0.014 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0175$ 98.3643 100 0.090 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0420$ 95.8097 100 0.002 4 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.1126 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3110$ 1102.800 100 0.002 5 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0901 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 1002.300 100 0.002 10 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 502.3318 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4330$ 503.5567 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 50 1.00 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4390$ 503.5631 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 80 1.60 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4420$ 503.5738
 $D$ $A$ $C$ $p$ $k$ $h$ $I_{e}$ $I_{p}$ $N$ $M$ $W$ $W/D$ $W^*$ $\Delta_{1}$ $\Delta_{2}$ $\Delta_{3}$ $\Delta_{4}$ $\Delta_{5}$ $T^{\ast }$ $Z(T^{\ast })_{\mathrm{}}$ 100 0.010 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{1}^{*}=0.0141$ 98.6175 100 0.014 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{4}^{*}=0.0175$ 98.3643 100 0.090 1 2 1.00 0.955 0.000115 0.15 0.01650098 0.016501 1.65 0.0165 0.0330 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.0420$ 95.8097 100 0.002 4 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.1126 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.3110$ 1102.800 100 0.002 5 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0901 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 1002.300 100 0.002 10 15 0.90 0.100 0.130000 0.15 0.01700000 0.030000 1.65 0.0165 0.0451 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $<$0 $T_{2}^{*}=0.0169$ 502.3318 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 18 0.36 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{5}^{*}=0.4330$ 503.5567 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 50 1.00 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4390$ 503.5631 50 0.500 10 20 0.25 0.200 0.120000 0.15 0.12000000 0.15000 80 1.60 0.3010 $>$0 $>$0 $<$0 $<$0 $>$0 $T_{8}^{*}=0.4420$ 503.5738
 [1] Chui-Yu Chiu, Ming-Feng Yang, Chung-Jung Tang, Yi Lin. Integrated imperfect production inventory model under permissible delay in payments depending on the order quantity. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (4) : 945-965. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.945 [2] Konstantina Skouri, Ioannis Konstantaras. Two-warehouse inventory models for deteriorating products with ramp type demand rate. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (4) : 855-883. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.855 [3] Jun Li, Hairong Feng, Mingchao Wang. A replenishment policy with defective products, backlog and delay of payments. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 867-880. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.867 [4] Jun Li, Hairong Feng, Kun-Jen Chung. Using the algebraic approach to determine the replenishment optimal policy with defective products, backlog and delay of payments in the supply chain management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 263-269. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.263 [5] Sankar Kumar Roy, Magfura Pervin, Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. A two-warehouse probabilistic model with price discount on backorders under two levels of trade-credit policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018167 [6] Yanju Zhou, Zhen Shen, Renren Ying, Xuanhua Xu. A loss-averse two-product ordering model with information updating in two-echelon inventory system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 687-705. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017069 [7] Vincent Choudri, Mathiyazhgan Venkatachalam, Sethuraman Panayappan. Production inventory model with deteriorating items, two rates of production cost and taking account of time value of money. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1153-1172. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1153 [8] Magfura Pervin, Sankar Kumar Roy, Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. A two-echelon inventory model with stock-dependent demand and variable holding cost for deteriorating items. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (1) : 21-50. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017002 [9] Magfura Pervin, Sankar Kumar Roy, Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. An integrated inventory model with variable holding cost under two levels of trade-credit policy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (2) : 169-191. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018010 [10] Biswajit Sarkar, Bijoy Kumar Shaw, Taebok Kim, Mitali Sarkar, Dongmin Shin. An integrated inventory model with variable transportation cost, two-stage inspection, and defective items. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1975-1990. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017027 [11] Gaidi Li, Jiating Shao, Dachuan Xu, Wen-Qing Xu. The warehouse-retailer network design game. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 291-305. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.291 [12] Lin Zhao, Zhi-Cheng Wang, Liang Zhang. Threshold dynamics of a time periodic and two–group epidemic model with distributed delay. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (5&6) : 1535-1563. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017080 [13] David M. Bortz. Characteristic roots for two-lag linear delay differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (8) : 2409-2422. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016053 [14] Suqi Ma, Zhaosheng Feng, Qishao Lu. A two-parameter geometrical criteria for delay differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (2) : 397-413. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.397 [15] Mohsen Lashgari, Ata Allah Taleizadeh, Shib Sankar Sana. An inventory control problem for deteriorating items with back-ordering and financial considerations under two levels of trade credit linked to order quantity. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1091-1119. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1091 [16] Magfura Pervin, Sankar Kumar Roy, Gerhard Wilhelm Weber. Multi-item deteriorating two-echelon inventory model with price- and stock-dependent demand: A trade-credit policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1345-1373. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018098 [17] Xiaoqin P. Wu, Liancheng Wang. Hopf bifurcation of a class of two coupled relaxation oscillators of the van der Pol type with delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (2) : 503-516. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.503 [18] Hong Il Cho, Gang Uk Hwang. Optimal design and analysis of a two-hop relay network under Rayleigh fading for packet delay minimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 607-622. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.607 [19] Ling Lin, Dong He, Zhiyi Tan. Bounds on delay start LPT algorithm for scheduling on two identical machines in the $l_p$ norm. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 817-826. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.817 [20] Richard H. Rand, Asok K. Sen. A numerical investigation of the dynamics of a system of two time-delay coupled relaxation oscillators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (4) : 567-577. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.567

2017 Impact Factor: 0.994