# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

December  2015, 8(4): 707-723. doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.707

## An asymptotic-preserving scheme for the semiconductor Boltzmann equation with two-scale collisions: A splitting approach

 1 Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, 150 N. University St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 480 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706 3 Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States

Received  August 2014 Revised  April 2015 Published  July 2015

We present a new asymptotic-preserving scheme for the semiconductor Boltzmann equation with two-scale collisions --- a leading-order elastic collision together with a lower-order interparticle collision. When the mean free path is small, numerically solving this equation is prohibitively expensive due to the stiff collision terms. Furthermore, since the equilibrium solution is a (zero-momentum) Fermi-Dirac distribution resulting from joint action of both collisions, the simple BGK penalization designed for the one-scale collision [10] cannot capture the correct energy-transport limit. This problem was addressed in [13], where a thresholded BGK penalization was introduced. Here we propose an alternative based on a splitting approach. It has the advantage of treating the collisions at different scales separately, hence is free of choosing threshold and easier to implement. Formal asymptotic analysis and numerical results validate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed scheme.
Citation: Jingwei Hu, Shi Jin, Li Wang. An asymptotic-preserving scheme for the semiconductor Boltzmann equation with two-scale collisions: A splitting approach. Kinetic & Related Models, 2015, 8 (4) : 707-723. doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.707
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Jeffrey R. Haack, Cory D. Hauck. Oscillatory behavior of Asymptotic-Preserving splitting methods for a linear model of diffusive relaxation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (4) : 573-590. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.573 [2] Stéphane Brull, Pierre Degond, Fabrice Deluzet, Alexandre Mouton. Asymptotic-preserving scheme for a bi-fluid Euler-Lorentz model. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (4) : 991-1023. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.991 [3] Li Chen, Xiu-Qing Chen, Ansgar Jüngel. Semiclassical limit in a simplified quantum energy-transport model for semiconductors. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (4) : 1049-1062. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.1049 [4] Liu Liu. Uniform spectral convergence of the stochastic Galerkin method for the linear semiconductor Boltzmann equation with random inputs and diffusive scaling. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (5) : 1139-1156. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018044 [5] Alina Chertock, Changhui Tan, Bokai Yan. An asymptotic preserving scheme for kinetic models with singular limit. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 735-756. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018030 [6] Shi Jin, Xu Yang, Guangwei Yuan. A domain decomposition method for a two-scale transport equation with energy flux conserved at the interface. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (1) : 65-84. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.65 [7] Alexander Bobylev, Raffaele Esposito. Transport coefficients in the $2$-dimensional Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2013, 6 (4) : 789-800. doi: 10.3934/krm.2013.6.789 [8] Alina Chertock, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvi${\rm{\check{d}}}$ová, Șeyma Nur Özcan. An asymptotic preserving scheme for kinetic chemotaxis models in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (1) : 195-216. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019009 [9] Nicolas Crouseilles, Mohammed Lemou, SV Raghurama Rao, Ankit Ruhi, Muddu Sekhar. Asymptotic preserving scheme for a kinetic model describing incompressible fluids. Kinetic & Related Models, 2016, 9 (1) : 51-74. doi: 10.3934/krm.2016.9.51 [10] Marcel Braukhoff. Global analytic solutions of the semiconductor Boltzmann-Dirac-Benney equation with relaxation time approximation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (1) : 187-210. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020007 [11] François Dubois. Third order equivalent equation of lattice Boltzmann scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 221-248. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.221 [12] Franck Davhys Reval Langa, Morgan Pierre. A doubly splitting scheme for the Caginalp system with singular potentials and dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020353 [13] Manh Hong Duong, Yulong Lu. An operator splitting scheme for the fractional kinetic Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (10) : 5707-5727. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019250 [14] Makoto Okumura, Daisuke Furihata. A structure-preserving scheme for the Allen–Cahn equation with a dynamic boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (8) : 4927-4960. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020206 [15] Marcel Braukhoff. Semiconductor Boltzmann-Dirac-Benney equation with a BGK-type collision operator: Existence of solutions vs. ill-posedness. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (2) : 445-482. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019019 [16] Per Christian Moan, Jitse Niesen. On an asymptotic method for computing the modified energy for symplectic methods. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (3) : 1105-1120. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1105 [17] Stefan Possanner, Claudia Negulescu. Diffusion limit of a generalized matrix Boltzmann equation for spin-polarized transport. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (4) : 1159-1191. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.1159 [18] Martin Frank, Thierry Goudon. On a generalized Boltzmann equation for non-classical particle transport. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (3) : 395-407. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.395 [19] Taposh Kumar Das, Óscar López Pouso. New insights into the numerical solution of the Boltzmann transport equation for photons. Kinetic & Related Models, 2014, 7 (3) : 433-461. doi: 10.3934/krm.2014.7.433 [20] Yohan Penel. An explicit stable numerical scheme for the $1D$ transport equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2012, 5 (3) : 641-656. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.641

2018 Impact Factor: 1.38