2009, 6(1): 173-188. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.173

Solution of the Michaelis-Menten equation using the decomposition method

1. 

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, United States

2. 

Cell Culture Development, Global Biologics Development, Bayer HealthCare, 800 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States

Received  December 2007 Revised  August 2008 Published  December 2008

We present a low-order recursive solution to the Michaelis-Menten equation using the decomposition method. This solution is algebraic in nature and provides a simpler alternative to numerical approaches such as differential equation evaluation and root-solving techniques that are currently used to compute substrate concentration in the Michaelis-Menten equation. A detailed characterization of the errors in substrate concentrations computed from decomposition, Runge-Kutta, and bisection methods over a wide range of $s_{0} $:$K_{m}$ values was made by comparing them with highly accurate solutions obtained using the Lambert $W$ function. Our results indicated that solutions obtained from the decomposition method were usually more accurate than those from the corresponding classical Runge-Kutta methods. Moreover, these solutions required significantly fewer computations than the root-solving method. Specifically, when the stepsize was 0.1% of the total time interval, the computed substrate concentrations using the decomposition method were characterized by accuracies on the order of 10$^-8$ or better. The algebraic nature of the decomposition solution and its relatively high accuracy make this approach an attractive candidate for computing substrate concentration in the Michaelis-Menten equation.
Citation: Jagadeesh R. Sonnad, Chetan T. Goudar. Solution of the Michaelis-Menten equation using the decomposition method. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (1) : 173-188. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.173
[1]

Karl Peter Hadeler. Michaelis-Menten kinetics, the operator-repressor system, and least squares approaches. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1541-1560. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1541

[2]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Helen Moore. Optimal control applied to a generalized Michaelis-Menten model of CML therapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 331-346. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018022

[3]

Maciej Leszczyński, Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2315-2334. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019097

[4]

Yangjin Kim, Khalid Boushaba. An enzyme kinetics model of tumor dormancy, regulation of secondary metastases. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1465-1498. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1465

[5]

Jeng-Huei Chen. An analysis of functional curability on HIV infection models with Michaelis-Menten-type immune response and its generalization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (6) : 2089-2120. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017086

[6]

Xu Yang, François Golse, Zhongyi Huang, Shi Jin. Numerical study of a domain decomposition method for a two-scale linear transport equation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (1) : 143-166. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.143

[7]

Sun-Ho Choi. Weighted energy method and long wave short wave decomposition on the linearized compressible Navier-Stokes equation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (2) : 465-479. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.465

[8]

Shi Jin, Xu Yang, Guangwei Yuan. A domain decomposition method for a two-scale transport equation with energy flux conserved at the interface. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (1) : 65-84. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.65

[9]

Dan Stanescu, Benito Chen-Charpentier. Random coefficient differential equation models for Monod kinetics. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 719-728. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.719

[10]

Fang Zeng, Pablo Suarez, Jiguang Sun. A decomposition method for an interior inverse scattering problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 291-303. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.291

[11]

Simone Cacace, Maurizio Falcone. A dynamic domain decomposition for the eikonal-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 109-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.109

[12]

Tao Wu, Yu Lei, Jiao Shi, Maoguo Gong. An evolutionary multiobjective method for low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (1) : 23-37. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017006

[13]

Nobu Kishimoto. Resonant decomposition and the $I$-method for the two-dimensional Zakharov system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (9) : 4095-4122. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4095

[14]

Qingping Deng. A nonoverlapping domain decomposition method for nonconforming finite element problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (3) : 297-310. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.297

[15]

Jing Xu, Xue-Cheng Tai, Li-Lian Wang. A two-level domain decomposition method for image restoration. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2010, 4 (3) : 523-545. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2010.4.523

[16]

Ming Huang, Cong Cheng, Yang Li, Zun Quan Xia. The space decomposition method for the sum of nonlinear convex maximum eigenvalues and its applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019034

[17]

Felipe Hernandez. A decomposition for the Schrödinger equation with applications to bilinear and multilinear estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 627-646. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018034

[18]

Xiaomao Deng, Xiao-Chuan Cai, Jun Zou. A parallel space-time domain decomposition method for unsteady source inversion problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1069-1091. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1069

[19]

Xi-Hong Yan. A new convergence proof of augmented Lagrangian-based method with full Jacobian decomposition for structured variational inequalities. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 45-54. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.45

[20]

S. L. Ma'u, P. Ramankutty. An averaging method for the Helmholtz equation. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 604-609. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.604

2017 Impact Factor: 1.23

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (6)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]