American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2019, 9(2): 223-255. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019012

Construction of the minimum time function for linear systems via higher-order set-valued methods

Robert Baier 1, and  Thuy T. T. Le 2,,

1. 

Universität Bayreuth, Mathematisches Institut, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
2. 

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Department of Mathematics, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany

* Corresponding author: Thuy T. T. Le

Received  December 2016 Revised  March 2018 Published  November 2018

Fund Project: The second author is supported by a PhD fellowship for foreign students at the Università di Padova funded by Fondazione CARIPARO. This paper was developed while the second author was visiting the Department of Mathematics of the University of Bayreuth.

The paper is devoted to introducing an approach to compute the approximate minimum time function of control problems which is based on reachable set approximation and uses arithmetic operations for convex compact sets. In particular, in this paper the theoretical justification of the proposed approach is restricted to a class of linear control systems. The error estimate of the fully discrete reachable set is provided by employing the Hausdorff distance to the continuous-time reachable set. The detailed procedure solving the corresponding discrete set-valued problem is described. Under standard assumptions, by means of convex analysis and knowledge of the regularity of the true minimum time function, we estimate the error of its approximation. Higher-order discretization of the reachable set of the linear control problem can balance missing regularity (e.g., if only Hölder continuity holds) of the minimum time function for smoother problems. To illustrate the error estimates and to demonstrate differences to other numerical approaches we provide a collection of numerical examples which either allow higher order of convergence with respect to time discretization or where the continuity of the minimum time function cannot be sufficiently granted, i.e., we study cases in which the minimum time function is Hölder continuous or even discontinuous.

Keywords: Minimum time function, reachable sets, linear control problems, higher-order set-valued methods, direct discretization methods.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 49N60, 93B03 (49N05, 49M25, 52A27).
Citation: Robert Baier, Thuy T. T. Le. Construction of the minimum time function for linear systems via higher-order set-valued methods. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (2) : 223-255. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019012
References:
[1]

W. Alt, R. Baier, M. Gerdts and F. Lempio, Approximations of linear control problems with bang-bang solutions, Optimization, 62 (2013), 9-32.  doi: 10.1080/02331934.2011.568619.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Althoff, Reachability Analysis and its Application to the Safety Assessment of Autonomous Cars, PhD thesis, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2010, 221 S. Google Scholar

[3]

J.-P. Aubin, A. M. Bayen and P. Saint-Pierre, Viability Theory. New Directions, 2nd edition, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16684-6.  Google Scholar

[4]

J.-P. Aubin and A. Cellina, Differential Inclusions, vol. 264 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo, 1984. Google Scholar

[5]

R. J. Aumann, Integrals of set-valued functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 12 (1965), 1-12.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(65)90049-1.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Baier, Mengenwertige Integration und die diskrete Approximation erreichbarer Mengen, [Set-valued Integration and the Discrete Approximation of Reachable Sets], PhD thesis, Universität Bayreuth, 1994.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. Baier, Selection strategies for set-valued Runge-Kutta methods, in Numerical Analysis and Its Applications, Third International Conference, NAA 2004, Rousse, Bulgaria, June 29 - July 3, 2004, Revised Selected Papers (eds. Z. Li, L. G. Vulkov and J. Wasniewski), vol. 3401 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2005, 149-157. Google Scholar

[8]

R. Baier, C. Büskens, I. A. Chahma and M. Gerdts, Approximation of reachable sets by direct solution methods of optimal control problems, Optim. Methods Softw., 22 (2007), 433-452.  doi: 10.1080/10556780600604999.  Google Scholar

[9]

R. Baier and F. Lempio, Approximating reachable sets by extrapolation methods, in Curves and Surfaces in Geometric Design. Papers from the Second International Conference on Curves and Surfaces, held in Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France, July 10-16, 1993 (eds. P. J. Laurent, A. L. Méhauteé and L. L. Schumaker), A K Peters, Wellesley, 1994, 9-18.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. Baier and T. T. T. Le, Construction of the minimum time function via reachable sets of linear control systems. Part 1: error estimates, part 2: numerical computations, preprint, Dec 2015. arXiv: 1512.08630 and arXiv: 1512.08617. Google Scholar

[11]

R. Baier and F. Lempio, Computing Aumann's integral, in Modeling Techniques for Uncertain Systems, Proceedings of a Conference held in Sopron, Hungary, July 6-10, 1992 (eds. A. B. Kurzhanski and V. M. Veliov), vol. 18 of Progress in Systems and Control Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1994, 71-92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78787-4_7.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. Bardi and I. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1997, with appendices by Maurizio Falcone and Pierpaolo Soravia. doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4755-1.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Bardi and M. Falcone, An approximation scheme for the minimum time function, SIAM J. Control Optim., 28 (1990), 950-965.  doi: 10.1137/0328053.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. Bardi and M. Falcone, Discrete approximation of the minimal time function for systems with regular optimal trajectories, in Analysis and Optimization of Systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Antibes, June 12-15, 1990 (eds. A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions), vol. 144 of Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci., Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1990, 103-112. doi: 10.1007/BFb0120033.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. Bardi, M. Falcone and P. Soravia, Numerical methods for pursuit-evasion games via viscosity solutions, in Stochastic and Differential Games, vol. 4 of Ann. Internat. Soc. Dynam. Games, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1999, 105-175.  Google Scholar

[16]

O. Bokanowski, A. Briani and H. Zidani, Minimum time control problems for non-autonomous differential equations, Systems Control Lett., 58 (2009), 742-746.  doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.08.003.  Google Scholar

[17]

O. Bokanowski, N. Forcadel and H. Zidani, Reachability and minimal times for state constrained nonlinear problems without any controllability assumption, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4292-4316.  doi: 10.1137/090762075.  Google Scholar

[18]

F. H. Clarke, Y. S. Ledyaev, R. J. Stern and P. R. Wolenski, Nonsmooth Analysis and Control Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.  Google Scholar

[19]

G. Colombo and T. T. T. Le, Higher order discrete controllability and the approximation of the minimum time function, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 35 (2015), 4293-4322.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4293.  Google Scholar

[20]

G. Colombo, A. Marigonda and P. R. Wolenski, Some new regularity properties for the minimal time function, SIAM J. Control Optim., 44 (2006), 2285-2299.  doi: 10.1137/050630076.  Google Scholar

[21]

G. Colombo, K. T. Nguyen and L. V. Nguyen, Non-Lipschitz points and the SBV regularity of the minimum time function, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 51 (2014), 439-463.  doi: 10.1007/s00526-013-0682-9.  Google Scholar

[22]

B. D. Doitchinov and V. M. Veliov, Parametrizations of integrals of set-valued mappings and applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 179 (1993), 483-499.  doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1363.  Google Scholar

[23]

T. D. Donchev and E. M. Farkhi, Moduli of smoothness of vector valued functions of a real variable and applications, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 11 (1990), 497-509.  doi: 10.1080/01630569008816385.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. L. Dontchev and E. M. Farkhi, Error estimates for discretized differential inclusions, Computing, 41 (1989), 349-358.  doi: 10.1007/BF02241223.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. Falcone, Numerical Solution of Dynamic Programming Equations. Appendix A, in Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations (eds. M. Bardi and I. Capuzzo-Dolcetta), Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1997, 471-504. doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4755-1.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Gerdts, Optimal control of ODEs and DAEs, de Gruyter Textbook, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2012. doi: 10.1515/9783110249996.  Google Scholar

[27]

A. Girard, C. Le Guernic and O. Maler, Efficient computation of reachable sets of linear time-invariant systems with inputs, in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, vol. 3927 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., Springer, Berlin, 2006, 257-271. doi: 10.1007/11730637_21.  Google Scholar

[28]

L. Grüne and T. T. T. Le, A double-sided dynamic programming approach to the minimum time problem and its numerical approximation, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 121 (2017), 68-81.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2017.06.008.  Google Scholar

[29]

H. Hermes and J. LaSalle, Functional Analysis and Time Optimal Control, vol. 56 of Mathematics in science and engineering, Academic Press, New York, 1969.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. B. Kurzhanski and P. Varaiya, Dynamics and Control of Trajectory Tubes. Theory and Computation, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Springer, Cham-Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10277-1.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. T. T. Le, Results on Controllability and Numerical Approximation of the Minimum Time Function, PhD thesis, Dipartimento di Matematica, Padova, Italy, 2016. Google Scholar

[32]

C. Le Guernic, Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems with Linear Continuous Dynamics, PhD thesis, École Doctorale Mathématiques, Sciences et Technologies de l'Information, Informatique, Grenoble, France, 2009, 169 pages. Google Scholar

[33]

E. Lee and L. Markus, Foundations of Optimal Control Theory, SIAM Series in Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney, 1967.  Google Scholar

[34]

A. Marigonda, Second order conditions for the controllability of nonlinear systems with drift, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 5 (2006), 861-885.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.861.  Google Scholar

[35]

D. Pallaschke and R. Urbański, Pairs of Compact Convex Sets, vol. 548 of Mathematics and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9920-7.  Google Scholar

[36]

N. N. Petrov, On the Bellman function for the time-optimality process problem, Prikl. Mat. Meh., 34 (1970), 820-826.   Google Scholar

[37]

R. T. Rockafellar and R. J.-B. Wets, Variational Analysis, vol. 317 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3.  Google Scholar

[38]

P. Saint-Pierre, Approximation of the viability kernel, Appl. Math. Optim., 29 (1994), 187-209.  doi: 10.1007/BF01204182.  Google Scholar

[39]

A. Tolstonogov, Differential Inclusions in a Banach Space, vol. 524 of Mathematics and its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000, translated from the 1986 Russian original and revised by the author. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9490-5.  Google Scholar

[40]

V. M. Veliov, Discrete approximations of integrals of multivalued mappings, C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci., 42 (1989), 51-54.   Google Scholar

[41]

V. M. Veliov, Second order discrete approximation to linear differential inclusions, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 29 (1992), 439-451.  doi: 10.1137/0729026.  Google Scholar

[42]

M. D. Wills, Hausdorff distance and convex sets, J. Convex Anal., 14 (2007), 109-117.   Google Scholar

[43]

P. R. Wolenski, The exponential formula for the reachable set of a Lipschitz differential inclusion, SIAM J. Control Optim., 28 (1990), 1148-1161.  doi: 10.1137/0328062.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

W. Alt, R. Baier, M. Gerdts and F. Lempio, Approximations of linear control problems with bang-bang solutions, Optimization, 62 (2013), 9-32.  doi: 10.1080/02331934.2011.568619.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Althoff, Reachability Analysis and its Application to the Safety Assessment of Autonomous Cars, PhD thesis, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2010, 221 S. Google Scholar

[3]

J.-P. Aubin, A. M. Bayen and P. Saint-Pierre, Viability Theory. New Directions, 2nd edition, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16684-6.  Google Scholar

[4]

J.-P. Aubin and A. Cellina, Differential Inclusions, vol. 264 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo, 1984. Google Scholar

[5]

R. J. Aumann, Integrals of set-valued functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 12 (1965), 1-12.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(65)90049-1.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Baier, Mengenwertige Integration und die diskrete Approximation erreichbarer Mengen, [Set-valued Integration and the Discrete Approximation of Reachable Sets], PhD thesis, Universität Bayreuth, 1994.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. Baier, Selection strategies for set-valued Runge-Kutta methods, in Numerical Analysis and Its Applications, Third International Conference, NAA 2004, Rousse, Bulgaria, June 29 - July 3, 2004, Revised Selected Papers (eds. Z. Li, L. G. Vulkov and J. Wasniewski), vol. 3401 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2005, 149-157. Google Scholar

[8]

R. Baier, C. Büskens, I. A. Chahma and M. Gerdts, Approximation of reachable sets by direct solution methods of optimal control problems, Optim. Methods Softw., 22 (2007), 433-452.  doi: 10.1080/10556780600604999.  Google Scholar

[9]

R. Baier and F. Lempio, Approximating reachable sets by extrapolation methods, in Curves and Surfaces in Geometric Design. Papers from the Second International Conference on Curves and Surfaces, held in Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France, July 10-16, 1993 (eds. P. J. Laurent, A. L. Méhauteé and L. L. Schumaker), A K Peters, Wellesley, 1994, 9-18.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. Baier and T. T. T. Le, Construction of the minimum time function via reachable sets of linear control systems. Part 1: error estimates, part 2: numerical computations, preprint, Dec 2015. arXiv: 1512.08630 and arXiv: 1512.08617. Google Scholar

[11]

R. Baier and F. Lempio, Computing Aumann's integral, in Modeling Techniques for Uncertain Systems, Proceedings of a Conference held in Sopron, Hungary, July 6-10, 1992 (eds. A. B. Kurzhanski and V. M. Veliov), vol. 18 of Progress in Systems and Control Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1994, 71-92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78787-4_7.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. Bardi and I. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1997, with appendices by Maurizio Falcone and Pierpaolo Soravia. doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4755-1.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Bardi and M. Falcone, An approximation scheme for the minimum time function, SIAM J. Control Optim., 28 (1990), 950-965.  doi: 10.1137/0328053.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. Bardi and M. Falcone, Discrete approximation of the minimal time function for systems with regular optimal trajectories, in Analysis and Optimization of Systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Antibes, June 12-15, 1990 (eds. A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions), vol. 144 of Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci., Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1990, 103-112. doi: 10.1007/BFb0120033.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. Bardi, M. Falcone and P. Soravia, Numerical methods for pursuit-evasion games via viscosity solutions, in Stochastic and Differential Games, vol. 4 of Ann. Internat. Soc. Dynam. Games, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1999, 105-175.  Google Scholar

[16]

O. Bokanowski, A. Briani and H. Zidani, Minimum time control problems for non-autonomous differential equations, Systems Control Lett., 58 (2009), 742-746.  doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.08.003.  Google Scholar

[17]

O. Bokanowski, N. Forcadel and H. Zidani, Reachability and minimal times for state constrained nonlinear problems without any controllability assumption, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4292-4316.  doi: 10.1137/090762075.  Google Scholar

[18]

F. H. Clarke, Y. S. Ledyaev, R. J. Stern and P. R. Wolenski, Nonsmooth Analysis and Control Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.  Google Scholar

[19]

G. Colombo and T. T. T. Le, Higher order discrete controllability and the approximation of the minimum time function, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 35 (2015), 4293-4322.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4293.  Google Scholar

[20]

G. Colombo, A. Marigonda and P. R. Wolenski, Some new regularity properties for the minimal time function, SIAM J. Control Optim., 44 (2006), 2285-2299.  doi: 10.1137/050630076.  Google Scholar

[21]

G. Colombo, K. T. Nguyen and L. V. Nguyen, Non-Lipschitz points and the SBV regularity of the minimum time function, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 51 (2014), 439-463.  doi: 10.1007/s00526-013-0682-9.  Google Scholar

[22]

B. D. Doitchinov and V. M. Veliov, Parametrizations of integrals of set-valued mappings and applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 179 (1993), 483-499.  doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1363.  Google Scholar

[23]

T. D. Donchev and E. M. Farkhi, Moduli of smoothness of vector valued functions of a real variable and applications, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 11 (1990), 497-509.  doi: 10.1080/01630569008816385.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. L. Dontchev and E. M. Farkhi, Error estimates for discretized differential inclusions, Computing, 41 (1989), 349-358.  doi: 10.1007/BF02241223.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. Falcone, Numerical Solution of Dynamic Programming Equations. Appendix A, in Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations (eds. M. Bardi and I. Capuzzo-Dolcetta), Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1997, 471-504. doi: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4755-1.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Gerdts, Optimal control of ODEs and DAEs, de Gruyter Textbook, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2012. doi: 10.1515/9783110249996.  Google Scholar

[27]

A. Girard, C. Le Guernic and O. Maler, Efficient computation of reachable sets of linear time-invariant systems with inputs, in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, vol. 3927 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., Springer, Berlin, 2006, 257-271. doi: 10.1007/11730637_21.  Google Scholar

[28]

L. Grüne and T. T. T. Le, A double-sided dynamic programming approach to the minimum time problem and its numerical approximation, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 121 (2017), 68-81.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2017.06.008.  Google Scholar

[29]

H. Hermes and J. LaSalle, Functional Analysis and Time Optimal Control, vol. 56 of Mathematics in science and engineering, Academic Press, New York, 1969.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. B. Kurzhanski and P. Varaiya, Dynamics and Control of Trajectory Tubes. Theory and Computation, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Springer, Cham-Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10277-1.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. T. T. Le, Results on Controllability and Numerical Approximation of the Minimum Time Function, PhD thesis, Dipartimento di Matematica, Padova, Italy, 2016. Google Scholar

[32]

C. Le Guernic, Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems with Linear Continuous Dynamics, PhD thesis, École Doctorale Mathématiques, Sciences et Technologies de l'Information, Informatique, Grenoble, France, 2009, 169 pages. Google Scholar

[33]

E. Lee and L. Markus, Foundations of Optimal Control Theory, SIAM Series in Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney, 1967.  Google Scholar

[34]

A. Marigonda, Second order conditions for the controllability of nonlinear systems with drift, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 5 (2006), 861-885.  doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.861.  Google Scholar

[35]

D. Pallaschke and R. Urbański, Pairs of Compact Convex Sets, vol. 548 of Mathematics and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9920-7.  Google Scholar

[36]

N. N. Petrov, On the Bellman function for the time-optimality process problem, Prikl. Mat. Meh., 34 (1970), 820-826.   Google Scholar

[37]

R. T. Rockafellar and R. J.-B. Wets, Variational Analysis, vol. 317 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3.  Google Scholar

[38]

P. Saint-Pierre, Approximation of the viability kernel, Appl. Math. Optim., 29 (1994), 187-209.  doi: 10.1007/BF01204182.  Google Scholar

[39]

A. Tolstonogov, Differential Inclusions in a Banach Space, vol. 524 of Mathematics and its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000, translated from the 1986 Russian original and revised by the author. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9490-5.  Google Scholar

[40]

V. M. Veliov, Discrete approximations of integrals of multivalued mappings, C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci., 42 (1989), 51-54.   Google Scholar

[41]

V. M. Veliov, Second order discrete approximation to linear differential inclusions, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 29 (1992), 439-451.  doi: 10.1137/0729026.  Google Scholar

[42]

M. D. Wills, Hausdorff distance and convex sets, J. Convex Anal., 14 (2007), 109-117.   Google Scholar

[43]

P. R. Wolenski, The exponential formula for the reachable set of a Lipschitz differential inclusion, SIAM J. Control Optim., 28 (1990), 1148-1161.  doi: 10.1137/0328062.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Part of the triangulation
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Minimum time functions for Example 5.1 with different control sets
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Minimum time function for Example 5.1 with U = [−1, 1]2, $\mathcal{S} = \left\{ 0 \right\}$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Minimum time function for Example 5.2a) with target set {0} resp. B0.05(0)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Minimum time functions for Example 5.2b)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Approximate optimal trajectories for Example 5.2a) resp. b)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Minimum time functions for Examples 5.3 and 5.4
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Euler and Heun's iterates, minimum time function for Example 5.5 resp
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Reachable sets and minimum time functions for Example 5.6
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Reachable sets with various end times tf for Examples 5.7 and 5.8
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  Reachable sets with various end times and different target sets for Example 5.9
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12.  Reachable sets with various end times and different control sets for Example 5.10
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  error estimates for Example 5.1 with different control and target sets
$ N_{\mathcal{R}} = N_U $ $U=B_1(0)$, $\mathcal{S}=B_{0.25}(0)$ $U=[-1, 1]^2$, $\mathcal{S}=B_{0.25}(0)$ $U=[-1, 1]^2$, $\mathcal{S}=\left\{ 0 \right\}$
0.04 50 0.2951 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1862 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1332 0.0122
0.005 400 0.1132 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0683 0.0062
Table Options

Download as excel

$ N_{\mathcal{R}} = N_U $ $U=B_1(0)$, $\mathcal{S}=B_{0.25}(0)$ $U=[-1, 1]^2$, $\mathcal{S}=B_{0.25}(0)$ $U=[-1, 1]^2$, $\mathcal{S}=\left\{ 0 \right\}$
0.04 50 0.2951 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1862 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1332 0.0122
0.005 400 0.1132 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0683 0.0062
Table 2.  Error estimates for Ex. 5.2 a) for combination methods of order 1 and 2
h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ Euler scheme & Riemann sum Heun's scheme & trapezoid rule
0.04 50 0.2951 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1862 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1332 0.0122
0.005 400 0.1132 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0683 0.0062
Table Options

Download as excel

h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ Euler scheme & Riemann sum Heun's scheme & trapezoid rule
0.04 50 0.2951 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1862 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1332 0.0122
0.005 400 0.1132 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0683 0.0062
Table 3.  Error estimates for Ex. 5.2 a) for Runge-Kutta meth. of order 1 and 2
h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ set-valued Euler method set-valued Heun method
0.04 50 0.2330 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1681 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1149 0.0122
0.005 400 0.0753 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0318 0.0062
Table Options

Download as excel

h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ set-valued Euler method set-valued Heun method
0.04 50 0.2330 0.2265
0.02 100 0.1681 0.1180
0.01 200 0.1149 0.0122
0.005 400 0.0753 0.0062
0.0025 800 0.0318 0.0062
Table 4.  Error estimates for Example 5.3 for methods of order 1 and 2
h Euler scheme & Riemann sum Heun's scheme & trapezoid rule
0.05 0.170 0.1153
0.025 0.095 0.0470
0.0125 0.0599 0.0133
0.00625 0.0285 0.0032
Table Options

Download as excel

h Euler scheme & Riemann sum Heun's scheme & trapezoid rule
0.05 0.170 0.1153
0.025 0.095 0.0470
0.0125 0.0599 0.0133
0.00625 0.0285 0.0032
Table 5.  Error estimates for Example 5.5 with set-valued methods of order 1 and 2
h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ set-valued Euler scheme set-valued Heun's scheme
0.5 50 0.0848 0.1461
0.1 100 0.0060 0.0076
0.05 200 0.0015 0.0020
0.025 400 0.00042 0.000502
0.0125 800 0.000108 0.000126
Table Options

Download as excel

h $N_{\mathcal{R}}$ set-valued Euler scheme set-valued Heun's scheme
0.5 50 0.0848 0.1461
0.1 100 0.0060 0.0076
0.05 200 0.0015 0.0020
0.025 400 0.00042 0.000502
0.0125 800 0.000108 0.000126
[1]

Sandrine Anthoine, Jean-François Aujol, Yannick Boursier, Clothilde Mélot. Some proximal methods for Poisson intensity CBCT and PET. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (4) : 565-598. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.565
[2]

Luke Finlay, Vladimir Gaitsgory, Ivan Lebedev. Linear programming solutions of periodic optimization problems: approximation of the optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 399-413. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.399
[3]

Alexandre B. Simas, Fábio J. Valentim. $W$-Sobolev spaces: Higher order and regularity. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (2) : 597-607. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.597
[4]

Hong Seng Sim, Wah June Leong, Chuei Yee Chen, Siti Nur Iqmal Ibrahim. Multi-step spectral gradient methods with modified weak secant relation for large scale unconstrained optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (3) : 377-387. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018024
[5]

Alexander A. Davydov, Massimo Giulietti, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco. Linear nonbinary covering codes and saturating sets in projective spaces. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2011, 5 (1) : 119-147. doi: 10.3934/amc.2011.5.119
[6]

Diana Keller. Optimal control of a linear stochastic Schrödinger equation. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 437-446. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.437
[7]

Hirofumi Notsu, Masato Kimura. Symmetry and positive definiteness of the tensor-valued spring constant derived from P1-FEM for the equations of linear elasticity. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2014, 9 (4) : 617-634. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.617
[8]

Paula A. González-Parra, Sunmi Lee, Leticia Velázquez, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. A note on the use of optimal control on a discrete time model of influenza dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (1) : 183-197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.183
[9]

John T. Betts, Stephen Campbell, Claire Digirolamo. Examination of solving optimal control problems with delays using GPOPS-Ⅱ. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 283-305. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020026
[10]

A. Aghajani, S. F. Mottaghi. Regularity of extremal solutions of semilinaer fourth-order elliptic problems with general nonlinearities. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (3) : 887-898. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018044
[11]

Kaifang Liu, Lunji Song, Shan Zhao. A new over-penalized weak galerkin method. Part Ⅰ: Second-order elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2411-2428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020184
[12]

Xiaomao Deng, Xiao-Chuan Cai, Jun Zou. A parallel space-time domain decomposition method for unsteady source inversion problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1069-1091. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1069
[13]

Rafael G. L. D'Oliveira, Marcelo Firer. Minimum dimensional Hamming embeddings. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (2) : 359-366. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017029
[14]

Sergi Simon. Linearised higher variational equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (11) : 4827-4854. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4827
[15]

Johannes Kellendonk, Lorenzo Sadun. Conjugacies of model sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (7) : 3805-3830. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017161
[16]

Christopher Bose, Rua Murray. Minimum 'energy' approximations of invariant measures for nonsingular transformations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 597-615. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.597
[17]

Guido De Philippis, Antonio De Rosa, Jonas Hirsch. The area blow up set for bounded mean curvature submanifolds with respect to elliptic surface energy functionals. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (12) : 7031-7056. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019243
[18]

Yves Dumont, Frederic Chiroleu. Vector control for the Chikungunya disease. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (2) : 313-345. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.313
[19]

Sara Munday. On the derivative of the $\alpha$-Farey-Minkowski function. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (2) : 709-732. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.709
[20]

Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133

2019 Impact Factor: 0.857

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (153)
  • HTML views (714)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences