Journal of Dynamics and Games (JDG)

Collective attention and ranking methods
Pages: 17 - 43, Issue 1, January 2014

doi:10.3934/jdg.2014.1.17      Abstract        References        Full text (528.2K)           Related Articles

Gabrielle Demange - PSE-EHESS, 48 bd Jourdan, Paris, 75014, France (email)

1 A. Altman and M. Tennenholtz, On the axiomatic foundations of ranking systems, Proc. 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2005), 917-922.
2 R. Amir, Impact-adjusted citations as a measure of journal quality, CORE DP 74, (2002).
3 A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert and H. Jeong, Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 272 (1999), 173-187.
4 M. Bacharach, Estimating nonnegative matrices from marginal data, Int. Econ. Rev., 6 (1965), 294-310.
5 P. Bonacich, Power and centrality: A family of measures, Amer. J. Sociology, 92 (1987), 1170-1182.
6 S. Brin and L. Page, The anatomy of large-scale hypertextual web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (1998), 107-117.
7 J. Cho, S. Roy and R. Adams, Page quality: In search of an unbiased web ranking, in "SIGMOD '05," Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD, ACM, New York, (2005), 551-562.
8 G. de Clippel, H. Moulin and N. Tideman, Impartial division of a dollar, J. Econ. Theory, 139 (2008), 176-191.       
9 M. H. DeGroot, Reaching a consensus, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69 (1974), 118-121.
10 G. Demange, On the influence of a ranking system, Soc. Choice Welfare, 39 (2012), 431-455.
11 G. Demange, A ranking method based on handicaps, PSE DP 16 (2012). Available from: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00687180.
12 P. M. DeMarzo, D. Vayanos and J. Zwiebel, Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions, Q. J. Econ., 118 (2003), 909-968.
13 B. Golub and M. Jackson, Naïve learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds, Am. Econ. J.: Microeconomics, 2 (2010), 112-149.
14 S. Goyal, Learning in networks, in "Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs and Coalitions" (eds. G. Demange and M. Wooders), Cambridge University Press, (2005), 122-170.
15 L. Katz, A new status index derived from sociometric analysis, Psychometrika, 18 (1953), 39-43.
16 J. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment, J. ACM, 46 (1999), 604-632.       
17 S. J. Liebowitz and J. C. Palmer, Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals, J. Econ. Lit., 22 (1984), 77-88.
18 I. Palacios-Huerta and O. Volij, The measurement of intellectual influence, Econometrica, 72 (2004), 963-977.
19 S. Pandey, S. Roy, C. Olston, J. Cho and S. Chakrabarti, Shuffling a stacked deck: The case for partially randomized ranking of search engine results, VLDP Conference, (2005), 781-792.
20 G. Pinski and F. Narin, Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics, Information Processing and Management, 12 (1976), 297-312.
21 G. Slutzki and O. Volij, Scoring of web pages and tournaments-axiomatizations, Soc. Choice Welfare, 26 (2006), 75-92.       

Go to top