American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
August  2007, 1(3): 287-306. doi: 10.3934/amc.2007.1.287

Eigenvalue bounds on the pseudocodeword weight of expander codes

Christine A. Kelley 1, and  Deepak Sridhara 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
2. 

Seagate Technology, 1251 Waterfront Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, United States

Received  September 2006 Revised  July 2007 Published  July 2007

Four different ways of obtaining low-density parity-check codes from expander graphs are considered. For each case, lower bounds on the minimum stopping set size and the minimum pseudocodeword weight of expander (LDPC) codes are derived. These bounds are compared with the known eigenvalue-based lower bounds on the minimum distance of expander codes. Furthermore, Tanner's parity-oriented eigenvalue lower bound on the minimum distance is generalized to yield a new lower bound on the minimum pseudocodeword weight. These bounds are useful in predicting the performance of LDPC codes under graph-based iterative decoding and linear programming decoding.
Keywords: pseudocodeword weight, pseudocodewords, iterative decoding., LDPC codes, Expander graphs.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3.
Citation: Christine A. Kelley, Deepak Sridhara. Eigenvalue bounds on the pseudocodeword weight of expander codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2007, 1 (3) : 287-306. doi: 10.3934/amc.2007.1.287
[1]

Alexander Barg, Arya Mazumdar, Gilles Zémor. Weight distribution and decoding of codes on hypergraphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (4) : 433-450. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.433
[2]

Alexey Frolov, Victor Zyablov. On the multiple threshold decoding of LDPC codes over GF(q). Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (1) : 123-137. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017007
[3]

Christine A. Kelley, Deepak Sridhara, Joachim Rosenthal. Zig-zag and replacement product graphs and LDPC codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (4) : 347-372. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.347
[4]

Ricardo A. Podestá, Denis E. Videla. The weight distribution of irreducible cyclic codes associated with decomposable generalized Paley graphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021  doi: 10.3934/amc.2021002
[5]

Kwankyu Lee. Decoding of differential AG codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (2) : 307-319. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016007
[6]

Peter Vandendriessche. LDPC codes associated with linear representations of geometries. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (3) : 405-417. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.405
[7]

Elisa Gorla, Felice Manganiello, Joachim Rosenthal. An algebraic approach for decoding spread codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 443-466. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.443
[8]

Washiela Fish, Jennifer D. Key, Eric Mwambene. Partial permutation decoding for simplex codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 505-516. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.505
[9]

Fengwei Li, Qin Yue, Fengmei Liu. The weight distributions of constacyclic codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (3) : 471-480. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017039
[10]

Tim Alderson, Alessandro Neri. Maximum weight spectrum codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 13 (1) : 101-119. doi: 10.3934/amc.2019006
[11]

Srimathy Srinivasan, Andrew Thangaraj. Codes on planar Tanner graphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (2) : 131-163. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.131
[12]

Terasan Niyomsataya, Ali Miri, Monica Nevins. Decoding affine reflection group codes with trellises. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (4) : 385-400. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.385
[13]

Heide Gluesing-Luerssen, Uwe Helmke, José Ignacio Iglesias Curto. Algebraic decoding for doubly cyclic convolutional codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (1) : 83-99. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.83
[14]

Jong Yoon Hyun, Yoonjin Lee, Yansheng Wu. Connection of $ p $-ary $ t $-weight linear codes to Ramanujan Cayley graphs with $ t+1 $ eigenvalues. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021  doi: 10.3934/amc.2020133
[15]

Petr Lisoněk, Layla Trummer. Algorithms for the minimum weight of linear codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (1) : 195-207. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016.10.195
[16]

Xiangrui Meng, Jian Gao. Complete weight enumerator of torsion codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2020  doi: 10.3934/amc.2020124
[17]

Alexander A. Davydov, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco. On the weight distribution of the cosets of MDS codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021  doi: 10.3934/amc.2021042
[18]

Chengju Li, Sunghan Bae, Shudi Yang. Some two-weight and three-weight linear codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 13 (1) : 195-211. doi: 10.3934/amc.2019013
[19]

Hannes Bartz, Antonia Wachter-Zeh. Efficient decoding of interleaved subspace and Gabidulin codes beyond their unique decoding radius using Gröbner bases. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2018, 12 (4) : 773-804. doi: 10.3934/amc.2018046
[20]

Joan-Josep Climent, Diego Napp, Raquel Pinto, Rita Simões. Decoding of $2$D convolutional codes over an erasure channel. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (1) : 179-193. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016.10.179

2020 Impact Factor: 0.935

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (71)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy