American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2008, 2(1): 15-33. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.15

Duality for some families of correction capability optimized evaluation codes

Maria Bras-Amorós 1, and  Michael E. O'Sullivan 2,

1. 

Departament d'Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Països Catalans, 26, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain
2. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-7720, United States

Received  July 2007 Revised  November 2007 Published  January 2008

Improvements to code dimension of evaluation codes, while maintaining a fixed decoding radius, were discovered by Feng and Rao, 1995, and nicely described in terms of an order function by Høholdt, van Lint, Pellikaan, 1998. In an earlier work, 2006, we considered a different improvement, based on the observation that the decoding algorithm corrects an error vector based not so much on the weight of the vector but rather the ''footprint'' of the error locations. In both cases one can find minimal sets of parity checks defining the codes by means of the order function. In this paper we show that these minimal sets have a very useful closure property. For several important families of codes that we consider, this property allows us to construct a generating matrix for the code that has properties amenable to encoding. The generating matrix can be constructed by evaluating monomials in a set which also has the closure property.
Keywords: dual code., toric code, Reed-Muller code, Hermitian code, Algebraic-geometry code.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 94B2.
Citation: Maria Bras-Amorós, Michael E. O'Sullivan. Duality for some families of correction capability optimized evaluation codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (1) : 15-33. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.15
[1]

Laura Luzzi, Ghaya Rekaya-Ben Othman, Jean-Claude Belfiore. Algebraic reduction for the Golden Code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2012, 6 (1) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/amc.2012.6.1
[2]

Irene Márquez-Corbella, Edgar Martínez-Moro, Emilio Suárez-Canedo. On the ideal associated to a linear code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (2) : 229-254. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016003
[3]

Serhii Dyshko. On extendability of additive code isometries. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (1) : 45-52. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016.10.45
[4]

M. De Boeck, P. Vandendriessche. On the dual code of points and generators on the Hermitian variety $\mathcal{H}(2n+1,q^{2})$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2014, 8 (3) : 281-296. doi: 10.3934/amc.2014.8.281
[5]

Masaaki Harada, Takuji Nishimura. An extremal singly even self-dual code of length 88. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2007, 1 (2) : 261-267. doi: 10.3934/amc.2007.1.261
[6]

Olof Heden. The partial order of perfect codes associated to a perfect code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2007, 1 (4) : 399-412. doi: 10.3934/amc.2007.1.399
[7]

Selim Esedoḡlu, Fadil Santosa. Error estimates for a bar code reconstruction method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 1889-1902. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1889
[8]

Sihuang Hu, Gabriele Nebe. There is no $[24,12,9]$ doubly-even self-dual code over $\mathbb F_4$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (3) : 583-588. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016027
[9]

Masaaki Harada, Ethan Novak, Vladimir D. Tonchev. The weight distribution of the self-dual $[128,64]$ polarity design code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (3) : 643-648. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016032
[10]

M. Delgado Pineda, E. A. Galperin, P. Jiménez Guerra. MAPLE code of the cubic algorithm for multiobjective optimization with box constraints. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (3) : 407-424. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.407
[11]

Andrew Klapper, Andrew Mertz. The two covering radius of the two error correcting BCH code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (1) : 83-95. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.83
[12]

José Gómez-Torrecillas, F. J. Lobillo, Gabriel Navarro. Information--bit error rate and false positives in an MDS code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2015, 9 (2) : 149-168. doi: 10.3934/amc.2015.9.149
[13]

Martino Borello, Francesca Dalla Volta, Gabriele Nebe. The automorphism group of a self-dual $[72,36,16]$ code does not contain $\mathcal S_3$, $\mathcal A_4$ or $D_8$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (4) : 503-510. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.503
[14]

Michael Kiermaier, Johannes Zwanzger. A $\mathbb Z$4-linear code of high minimum Lee distance derived from a hyperoval. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2011, 5 (2) : 275-286. doi: 10.3934/amc.2011.5.275
[15]

Anna-Lena Horlemann-Trautmann, Kyle Marshall. New criteria for MRD and Gabidulin codes and some Rank-Metric code constructions. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (3) : 533-548. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017042
[16]

Denis S. Krotov, Patric R. J.  Östergård, Olli Pottonen. Non-existence of a ternary constant weight $(16,5,15;2048)$ diameter perfect code. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (2) : 393-399. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016013
[17]

Jianying Fang. 5-SEEDs from the lifted Golay code of length 24 over Z4. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (1) : 259-266. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017017
[18]

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, Sascha Kurz, Alfred Wassermann. A subspace code of size $ \bf{333} $ in the setting of a binary $ \bf{q} $-analog of the Fano plane. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 13 (3) : 457-475. doi: 10.3934/amc.2019029
[19]

Daniele Bartoli, Adnen Sboui, Leo Storme. Bounds on the number of rational points of algebraic hypersurfaces over finite fields, with applications to projective Reed-Muller codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2016, 10 (2) : 355-365. doi: 10.3934/amc.2016010
[20]

Martino Borello, Olivier Mila. Symmetries of weight enumerators and applications to Reed-Muller codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 13 (2) : 313-328. doi: 10.3934/amc.2019021

2018 Impact Factor: 0.879

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (13)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences