Edge number, minimum degree, maximum independent set, radius and diameter in twin-free graphs

Previous Article
The two covering radius of the two error correcting BCH code
AMC Home
This Issue
Next Article

February 2009, 3(1): 97-114. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.97

Edge number, minimum degree, maximum independent set, radius and diameter in twin-free graphs

David Auger ^1, , Irène Charon ^1, , Iiro Honkala ^2, , Olivier Hudry ^1, and Antoine Lobstein ^1,

1.	Institut TELECOM - TELECOM ParisTech, & Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - LTCI UMR 5141, 46, rue Barrault, 75634 Paris Cedex 13, France
2.	Department of Mathematics, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland

Received November 2008 Revised January 2009 Published January 2009

Abstract
Related Papers

Consider a connected, undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $r \geq 1$; for any vertex $v\in V$, let $B_r(v)$ denote the ball of radius $r$ centred at $v$, i.e., the set of all vertices linked to $v$ by a path consisting of at most $r$ edges. If for all vertices $v \in V$, the sets $B_r(v)$ are different, then we say that $G$ is $r$-twin-free.
In $r$-twin-free graphs, we prolong the study of the extremal values that can be achieved by the main classical parameters in graph theory, and investigate here the number of edges, the minimum degree, the size of a maximum independent set, as well as radius and diameter.

Keywords: identifying code, maximum stable set, maximum independent set, identifiable graph, minimum degree, Graph theory, twin-free graph, diameter., twins, radius.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 05C99; Secondary: 05C3.

Citation: David Auger, Irène Charon, Iiro Honkala, Olivier Hudry, Antoine Lobstein. Edge number, minimum degree, maximum independent set, radius and diameter in twin-free graphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (1) : 97-114. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.97

[1]	Mirela Domijan, Markus Kirkilionis. Graph theory and qualitative analysis of reaction networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 295-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.295
[2]	M. D. König, Stefano Battiston, M. Napoletano, F. Schweitzer. On algebraic graph theory and the dynamics of innovation networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 201-219. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.201
[3]	M. A. Efendiev. On the compactness of the stable set for rate independent processes. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2003, 2 (4) : 495-509. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2003.2.495
[4]	Eric Babson and Dmitry N. Kozlov. Topological obstructions to graph colorings. Electronic Research Announcements, 2003, 9: 61-68.
[5]	Oded Schramm. Hyperfinite graph limits. Electronic Research Announcements, 2008, 15: 17-23. doi: 10.3934/era.2008.15.17
[6]	J. William Hoffman. Remarks on the zeta function of a graph. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 413-422. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.413
[7]	John Kieffer and En-hui Yang. Ergodic behavior of graph entropy. Electronic Research Announcements, 1997, 3: 11-16.
[8]	Barton E. Lee. Consensus and voting on large graphs: An application of graph limit theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (4) : 1719-1744. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018071
[9]	Wei Gao, Juan Luis García Guirao, Mahmoud Abdel-Aty, Wenfei Xi. An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 877-886. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019058
[10]	Roy H. Goodman. NLS bifurcations on the bowtie combinatorial graph and the dumbbell metric graph. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (4) : 2203-2232. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019093
[11]	Mario Roy, Mariusz Urbański. Random graph directed Markov systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 30 (1) : 261-298. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.261
[12]	Dominique Zosso, Braxton Osting. A minimal surface criterion for graph partitioning. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (4) : 1149-1180. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016036
[13]	Mario Jorge Dias Carneiro, Rafael O. Ruggiero. On the graph theorem for Lagrangian minimizing tori. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (12) : 6029-6045. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018260
[14]	A. C. Eberhard, J-P. Crouzeix. Existence of closed graph, maximal, cyclic pseudo-monotone relations and revealed preference theory. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 233-255. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.233
[15]	Chun-Xiang Guo, Guo Qiang, Jin Mao-Zhu, Zhihan Lv. Dynamic systems based on preference graph and distance. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1139-1154. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1139
[16]	Liu Hui, Lin Zhi, Waqas Ahmad. Network(graph) data research in the coordinate system. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2018, 1 (1) : 1-10. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2018001
[17]	Mario Roy, Mariusz Urbański. Multifractal analysis for conformal graph directed Markov systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 25 (2) : 627-650. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.627
[18]	Matthew Macauley, Henning S. Mortveit. Update sequence stability in graph dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1533-1541. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1533
[19]	Deena Schmidt, Janet Best, Mark S. Blumberg. Random graph and stochastic process contributions to network dynamics. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1279-1288. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1279
[20]	Lasse Kliemann, Elmira Shirazi Sheykhdarabadi, Anand Srivastav. Price of anarchy for graph coloring games with concave payoff. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2017, 4 (1) : 41-58. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2017003

2018 Impact Factor: 0.879

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences