# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

May  2008, 7(3): 677-698. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.677

## Analysis of a biosensor model

 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton A B, Canada T6G 2G1 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G1 3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, Canada

Received  May 2007 Revised  September 2007 Published  February 2008

In this paper we consider a biosensor model in $R^3$, consisting of a coupled parabolic differential equation with Robin boundary condition and an ordinary differential equation. Theoretical analysis is done to show the existence and uniqueness of a Holder continuous solution based on a maximum principle, weak solution arguments. The long-time convergence to a steady state is also discussed as well as the system situation. Next, a finite volume method is applied to the model to obtain an approximate solution. Drawing in part on the analytical results given earlier, we establish the existence, stability and error estimates for the approximate solution, and derive $L^2$ spatial norm convergence properties. Finally, some illustrative numerical simulation results are presented.
Citation: Walter Allegretto, Yanping Lin, Zhiyong Zhang. Analysis of a biosensor model. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (3) : 677-698. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.677
 [1] Xiaofei Cao, Guowei Dai. Stability analysis of a model on varying domain with the Robin boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 935-942. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017048 [2] Caterina Calgaro, Meriem Ezzoug, Ezzeddine Zahrouni. Stability and convergence of an hybrid finite volume-finite element method for a multiphasic incompressible fluid model. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 429-448. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018024 [3] Raffaela Capitanelli. Robin boundary condition on scale irregular fractals. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (5) : 1221-1234. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1221 [4] Guowei Dai, Ruyun Ma, Haiyan Wang, Feng Wang, Kuai Xu. Partial differential equations with Robin boundary condition in online social networks. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (6) : 1609-1624. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1609 [5] Stefan Berres, Ricardo Ruiz-Baier, Hartmut Schwandt, Elmer M. Tory. An adaptive finite-volume method for a model of two-phase pedestrian flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (3) : 401-423. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.401 [6] Meihua Wei, Yanling Li, Xi Wei. Stability and bifurcation with singularity for a glycolysis model under no-flux boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (9) : 5203-5224. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019129 [7] Shijin Deng, Linglong Du, Shih-Hsien Yu. Nonlinear stability of Broadwell model with Maxwell diffuse boundary condition. Kinetic and Related Models, 2013, 6 (4) : 865-882. doi: 10.3934/krm.2013.6.865 [8] Kei Fong Lam, Hao Wu. Convergence to equilibrium for a bulk–surface Allen–Cahn system coupled through a nonlinear Robin boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (3) : 1847-1878. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020096 [9] Haiyang He. Asymptotic behavior of the ground state Solutions for Hénon equation with Robin boundary condition. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (6) : 2393-2408. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2393 [10] VicenŢiu D. RǍdulescu, Somayeh Saiedinezhad. A nonlinear eigenvalue problem with $p(x)$-growth and generalized Robin boundary value condition. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (1) : 39-52. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018003 [11] Pavol Kútik, Karol Mikula. Diamond--cell finite volume scheme for the Heston model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (5) : 913-931. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.913 [12] Matúš Tibenský, Angela Handlovičová. Convergence analysis of the discrete duality finite volume scheme for the regularised Heston model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 1181-1195. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020226 [13] Boris Andreianov, Mostafa Bendahmane, Kenneth H. Karlsen, Charles Pierre. Convergence of discrete duality finite volume schemes for the cardiac bidomain model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (2) : 195-240. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.195 [14] Christos V. Nikolopoulos, Georgios E. Zouraris. Numerical solution of a non-local elliptic problem modeling a thermistor with a finite element and a finite volume method. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 768-778. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.768 [15] Jihoon Lee, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen. Gromov-Hausdorff stability of reaction diffusion equations with Robin boundary conditions under perturbations of the domain and equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 1263-1296. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021020 [16] Wenzhen Gan, Peng Zhou. A revisit to the diffusive logistic model with free boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 837-847. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.837 [17] Jesús Ildefonso Díaz, L. Tello. On a climate model with a dynamic nonlinear diffusive boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (2) : 253-262. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.253 [18] Nan Li, Song Wang, Shuhua Zhang. Pricing options on investment project contraction and ownership transfer using a finite volume scheme and an interior penalty method. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (3) : 1349-1368. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019006 [19] Hatim Tayeq, Amal Bergam, Anouar El Harrak, Kenza Khomsi. Self-adaptive algorithm based on a posteriori analysis of the error applied to air quality forecasting using the finite volume method. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2557-2570. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020400 [20] Masaru Ikehata. On finding an obstacle with the Leontovich boundary condition via the time domain enclosure method. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2017, 11 (1) : 99-123. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017006

2021 Impact Factor: 1.273