Article Contents
Article Contents

# Stabilizing blow up solutions to nonlinear schrÖdinger equations

• In this paper, we consider the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equations in ${\mathbb{R}^2}$ with an oscillating nonlinearity, in a radial geometry. We numerically investigate the influence of the oscillations on the time of existence for the corresponding solution, on the spirit of the recent result of Cazenave and Scialom. It can be observed that the solution converges to the solution of a limit equation obtained with the weak limit of the oscillatory term, starting either with Gaussian data as well as standing waves solutions.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 35Q55, 35B44.

 Citation:

• Figure 1.  Profile of the solutions of (5) versus time for $\Omega = 0$, $\Omega = 4$ et $\Omega = +\infty$

Figure 2.  Profile of the lifespan $T_\Omega$ of the solution $u^\Omega$ as a function of $\Omega$

Figure 3.  Profiles of $|u|$ versus $x$ at final time computed with Dirichlet conditions (dot-dashed) and with transparent condition (continuous) starting from Gaussian data (dotted), linear case, amplitude $q = 1$, $d = 2$

Figure 4.  Profiles of $|u|$ versus $x$ and final time; computations performed with transparent conditions(up) and with Dirichlet condition (down) starting from the stationary state with mass excess $\varepsilon = 0.2$, one-dimensional case

Figure 5.  Profile of the solution amplitude at the origin versus time for $t\in [80,100]$; computations performed with transparent conditions(continuous) and with Dirichlet condition (dashed) starting from the stationary state with mass excess $\varepsilon = 0.2$, one-dimensional case

Figure 6.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$ for different values of space and time steps. Convergence to the exact global solution $e^{i\mu t} R_\mu(x)$ is observed

Figure 7.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 0$ (unperturbed case), $7$, $8$, $10$, $40$, Gaussian initial data with $q = 4$

Figure 8.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 100$, $200$, $1000$, $5000$ and limit case, Gaussian initial data with $q = 4$

Figure 9.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 0$ (unperturbed case), $1.4$, $1.43$, $2$, Gaussian initial data with $q = 3$

Figure 10.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 10$, $40$, $100$ and limit case, Gaussian initial data with $q = 3$

Figure 11.  Plot of $|u(t, .)|$ at different times ($t = 0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$), $g_1 = 4$

Figure 12.  Plot of $|u(t, .)|$ at different times ($t = 0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$), $g_1 = 2$

Figure 13.  Plot of $|u(t, .)|$ at different times ($t = 0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$), $g_1 = 1$

Figure 14.  Plot of $|u(t, .)|$ at different times ($t = 0$, $1$, $2$, $3$, $4$), $g_1 = \frac12$

Figure 15.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 0$, $3$, $5$, $20$, $40$ and comparison with the linear case, Gaussian initial data

Figure 16.  Plot of the mean radius $r_m(t)$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 0$, $3$, $5$, $20$, $40$ and comparison with the linear case, Gaussian initial data

Figure 17.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 0$, $0.2$, $0.5$, $1$, $20$ and comparison with the linear case, soliton-like initial data

Figure 18.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 20$, $40$, $80$, soliton-like initial data

Figure 19.  Plot of the mean radius $r_m(t)$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 20$, $40$, $80$, soliton-like initial data

Figure 20.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 40$, $70$, $100$, $200$ and comparison with the limit nonlinear case, soliton-like initial data

Figure 21.  Plot of the mean radius $r_m(t)$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 40$, $70$, $100$, $200$ and comparison with the limit nonlinear case, soliton-like initial data

Figure 22.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 20$, $40$, $80$, Gaussian normalized Cauchy data

Figure 23.  Plot of the mean radius $r_m(t)$ versus $t$, $\Omega = 20$, $40$, $80$, Gaussian normalized Cauchy data

Figure 24.  Plot of $\|u(t, .)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^2) }$ versus $t$ at small times, $\Omega = 40$, $80$, $150$, $300$ and comparison with the limit nonlinear case, normalized Gaussian initial data

Figure 25.  Plot of the mean radius $r_m(t)$ versus $t$ at small times, $\Omega = 40$, $80$, $150$, $300$ and comparison with the limit nonlinear case, normalized Gaussian initial data

•  [1] P. Antonelli, J.-C. Saut and C. Sparber, well-posedness, averagin of NLS with timeperiodic dispersion management, Adv. Diff. Eq., 18 (2013), 49-68. [2] A. Babin, A. Ilyin and E. Titi, On the regularization mechanism for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 64 (2011), 591-648.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.20356. [3] M. Barton-Smith, A. Debussche and L. Di Menza, Numerical Study of two-dimensional stochastic NLS Equations,, Num. Meth. for PDE's, 21 (2005), 810-842.  doi: 10.1002/num.20064. [4] C.-H. Bruneau, L. Di Menza and T. Lehner, Numerical resolution of some nonlinear Schrödinger equations in plasmas, Num. Meth. for PDE's, 15 (1999), 672-696.  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2426(199911)15:6<672::AID-NUM5>3.3.CO;2-A. [5] X. Carvajal, M. Panthee and M. Scialom, On the critical KDV equation with time-oscillating nonlinearity, Differential Integral Equations, 24 (2011), 541-567. [6] T. Cazenave and A. Haraux, Introduction aux problèmes, d'évolution semi-linéaires, Math. et Applications, Ellipses 1990. [7] T. Cazenave and M. Scialom, A Schrödinger equation with time-oscillating nonlinearity, Rev. Mat. Complut, 23 (2010), 321-339.  doi: 10.1007/s13163-009-0018-7. [8] I. Damergi, Equation de Schrödinger non linéaire avecnon-linéarité oscillante, Ph. D Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Tunisie, (2014). [9] I. Damergi and O. Goubet, Blowup solutions to the nonlinear Schrodinger equation with oscillating nonlinearities, J. of Math. Anal., Appl., 352 (2009), 336-344.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.07.079. [10] A. Debussche and L. Di Menza, Numerical simulation of focusing stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. D, 162 (2002), 131-154.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00379-7. [11] L. Di Menza, Absorbing boundary conditions on a hypersurface for the linear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 9 (1996), 55-59.  doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(96)00051-1. [12] L. Di Menza, Numerical computations of solitons in optical systems, M2AN, 3 (2009), 173-208.  doi: 10.1051/m2an:2008044. [13] R. T. Glassey, On the blowing up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for nonlinear Schrodinger equations, J. Math. Phy, 18 (1977), 1794-1797.  doi: 10.1063/1.523491. [14] V. Konotop and P. Pacciani, On collapse in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with time dependent nonlinearity. Application to Bose-Einstein condensates, arXiv: cond-mat/0504493 vl 19 apr 2005. doi: 10.1007/10928028_14. [15] M. Kunze, Infinitely many radial solutions of a variational problem related to dispersionmanaged optic fibers, Proceedings of the AMS, 131 (2003), 2181-2188.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-02-06780-1. [16] H. Liu and E. Tadmor, Rotation prevents finite time breakdown, Phys. D, 188 (2004), 262-276.  doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2003.07.006. [17] G. D. Montesinos and V. M. Pérez-Garcia, Pérez-Garcia, Numerical studies of stabilized Townes solitons, Math. and Computers in Simulation, 69 (2005), 447-456.  doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.03.009. [18] M. Panthee and M. Scialom, On the supercritical KdV equation with time-oscillating nonlinearity, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 20 (2013), 1191-1212.  doi: 10.1007/s00030-012-0204-z. [19] C. Sulem and P. L Sulem, The nonlinear Schröinger equation. Self-focusing and wave collapse, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 139. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. [20] V. E. Zakharov, Collapse of Lungmuir waves, Soviet Phys. JETP, vol., 35 (1972), 908-914. [21] V. Zharnitsky, E. Grenier, Ch. Jones and S. Turitsyn, Stabilizing effects of dispersion management, Physica D, 152-153 (2001), 794-817.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00213-5.

Figures(25)