Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

Xuewei Ju; Desheng Li

doi:10.3934/cpaa.2018091

Previous Article
A quasilinear parabolic problem with a source term and a nonlocal absorption
CPAA Home
This Issue
Next Article
Existence and asymptotic behaviors of traveling waves of a modified vector-disease model

September 2018, 17(5): 1921-1944. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018091

Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

Xuewei Ju ^1,, and Desheng Li ^2,

1.	Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
2.	School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

* Corresponding author

Received August 2017 Revised December 2017 Published April 2018

This work is concerned with the following nonautonomous evolutionary system on a Banach space

$X$

${x_t} + Ax = f\left( {x, h\left( t \right)} \right), \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left( {0.1} \right)$

where

$A$

is a hyperbolic sectorial operator on

$X$

, the nonlinearity

$f \in C({X^\alpha } \times X,X)$

is Lipschitz in the first variable, the nonautonomous forcing

$h \in C(\mathbb{R},X)$

$\mu $

-subexponentially growing for some

$\mu >0$

(see (3.4) below for definition). Under some reasonable assumptions, we first establish an existence result for a unique nonautonomous hyperbolic equilibrium for the system in the framework of cocycle semiflows. We then demonstrate that the system exhibits a global synchronising behavior with the nonautonomous forcing

$h$

as time varies. Finally, we apply the abstract results to stochastic partial differential equations with additive white noise and obtain stochastic hyperbolic equilibria for the corresponding systems.

Keywords: Nonautonomous dynamical systems, nonautonomous hyperbolic equilibrium, invariant manifolds of equilibrium, stochastic hyperbolic equilibrium, global synchronising behavior.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 37B55, 37D05, 37L55, 34D06, 37D10.

Citation: Xuewei Ju, Desheng Li. Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (5) : 1921-1944. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018091

References:

[1]	L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[2]	P. Brune and B. Schmalfuss, Inertial manifolds for stochastic pde with dynamical boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 10 (2011), 831-846. Google Scholar
[3]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-Dimensional Non-Autonomous Dynamical Systems, Appl. Math. Sci. 182, 2013.Google Scholar
[4]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa, J. C. Robinson and A. Suárez, Characterization of nonautonomous attractors of a perturbed gradient system, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 570-603. Google Scholar
[5]	A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, An extension of the concept of gradient semigroups which is stable under perturbation, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 2646-2668. Google Scholar
[6]	T. Caraballo, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, Exponentially stable stationary solutions for stochastic evolution equations and their perturbation, Appl. Math. Optim., 50 (2004), 183-207. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and Z. X. Liu, Gradient infinite-dimensional random dynamical system, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2012), 1817-1847. Google Scholar
[8]	X. Chen and J. Duan, State space decomposition for non-autonomous dynamical systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 141 (2011), 957-974. Google Scholar
[9]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar
[10]	D. Cheban, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, The relation between pullback and global attractors for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2 (2002), 125-144. Google Scholar
[11]	E. R. Arag$\tilde{a}$o-Costa, T. Caraballo, A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, Stability of gradient semigroups under perturbation, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 2099-2117. Google Scholar
[12]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. Google Scholar
[13]	H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 9 (1997), 307-341. Google Scholar
[14]	G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
[15]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial differential equations, Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. Google Scholar
[16]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Smooth stable and unstable manifolds for stochastic evolutionary equations, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 16 (2004), 949-972. Google Scholar
[17]	J. Duan and W. Wang, Effective Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2014.Google Scholar
[18]	J. K. Hale, Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., R. I., 1989.Google Scholar
[19]	D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Math. 840, Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
[20]	D. S. Li and X. X. Zhang, On dynamical properties of general dynamical systems and differential inclusions, J. Appl. Math. Anal. Appl., 274 (2002), 705-724. Google Scholar
[21]	D. S. Li and J. Duan, Structure of the set of bounded solutions for a class of nonautonomous second-order differential equations, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1754-1773. Google Scholar
[22]	D. S. Li, Morse theory of attractors via Lyapunov functions, preprint, arXiv: 1003.0305v1.Google Scholar
[23]	K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic wave equations, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 460-492. Google Scholar
[24]	J. C. Robinson, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
[25]	M. I. Vishik, S. V. Zelik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Regular attractors and nonautonomous perturbations of them, Mat. Sb., 204 (2013), 1-42. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[2]	P. Brune and B. Schmalfuss, Inertial manifolds for stochastic pde with dynamical boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 10 (2011), 831-846. Google Scholar
[3]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-Dimensional Non-Autonomous Dynamical Systems, Appl. Math. Sci. 182, 2013.Google Scholar
[4]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa, J. C. Robinson and A. Suárez, Characterization of nonautonomous attractors of a perturbed gradient system, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 570-603. Google Scholar
[5]	A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, An extension of the concept of gradient semigroups which is stable under perturbation, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 2646-2668. Google Scholar
[6]	T. Caraballo, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, Exponentially stable stationary solutions for stochastic evolution equations and their perturbation, Appl. Math. Optim., 50 (2004), 183-207. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and Z. X. Liu, Gradient infinite-dimensional random dynamical system, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2012), 1817-1847. Google Scholar
[8]	X. Chen and J. Duan, State space decomposition for non-autonomous dynamical systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 141 (2011), 957-974. Google Scholar
[9]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar
[10]	D. Cheban, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, The relation between pullback and global attractors for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2 (2002), 125-144. Google Scholar
[11]	E. R. Arag$\tilde{a}$o-Costa, T. Caraballo, A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, Stability of gradient semigroups under perturbation, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 2099-2117. Google Scholar
[12]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. Google Scholar
[13]	H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 9 (1997), 307-341. Google Scholar
[14]	G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
[15]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial differential equations, Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. Google Scholar
[16]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Smooth stable and unstable manifolds for stochastic evolutionary equations, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 16 (2004), 949-972. Google Scholar
[17]	J. Duan and W. Wang, Effective Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2014.Google Scholar
[18]	J. K. Hale, Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., R. I., 1989.Google Scholar
[19]	D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Math. 840, Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
[20]	D. S. Li and X. X. Zhang, On dynamical properties of general dynamical systems and differential inclusions, J. Appl. Math. Anal. Appl., 274 (2002), 705-724. Google Scholar
[21]	D. S. Li and J. Duan, Structure of the set of bounded solutions for a class of nonautonomous second-order differential equations, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1754-1773. Google Scholar
[22]	D. S. Li, Morse theory of attractors via Lyapunov functions, preprint, arXiv: 1003.0305v1.Google Scholar
[23]	K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic wave equations, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 460-492. Google Scholar
[24]	J. C. Robinson, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
[25]	M. I. Vishik, S. V. Zelik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Regular attractors and nonautonomous perturbations of them, Mat. Sb., 204 (2013), 1-42. Google Scholar

[1]	Ivan Werner. Equilibrium states and invariant measures for random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (3) : 1285-1326. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.1285
[2]	Chunqiu Li, Desheng Li, Xuewei Ju. On the forward dynamical behavior of nonautonomous systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (11) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019190
[3]	Alexander Arbieto, Luciano Prudente. Uniqueness of equilibrium states for some partially hyperbolic horseshoes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (1) : 27-40. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.27
[4]	Tatsien Li, Zhiqiang Wang. A note on the exact controllability for nonautonomous hyperbolic systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (1) : 229-235. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.229
[5]	Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Existence and asymptotic behaviour for solutions of dynamical equilibrium systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (1) : 1-14. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.1
[6]	MirosŁaw Lachowicz, Tatiana Ryabukha. Equilibrium solutions for microscopic stochastic systems in population dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 777-786. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.777
[7]	David Cheban. Global attractors of nonautonomous quasihomogeneous dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 96-101. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.96
[8]	Junxiang Xu. On quasi-periodic perturbations of hyperbolic-type degenerate equilibrium point of a class of planar systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (6) : 2593-2619. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2593
[9]	Arne Ogrowsky, Björn Schmalfuss. Unstable invariant manifolds for a nonautonomous differential equation with nonautonomous unbounded delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (6) : 1663-1681. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1663
[10]	Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579
[11]	Yejuan Wang, Chengkui Zhong, Shengfan Zhou. Pullback attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (3) : 587-614. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.587
[12]	Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Approximation of attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (2) : 215-238. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.215
[13]	Alessandro Fortunati, Stephen Wiggins. Normal forms à la Moser for aperiodically time-dependent Hamiltonians in the vicinity of a hyperbolic equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 1109-1118. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016044
[14]	Mohammadreza Molaei. Hyperbolic dynamics of discrete dynamical systems on pseudo-riemannian manifolds. Electronic Research Announcements, 2018, 25: 8-15. doi: 10.3934/era.2018.25.002
[15]	Björn Schmalfuss. Attractors for nonautonomous and random dynamical systems perturbed by impulses. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (3) : 727-744. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.727
[16]	Hongyong Cui, Peter E. Kloeden, Meihua Yang. Forward omega limit sets of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 1-12. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020065
[17]	Aicha Balhag, Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Existence and continuous-discrete asymptotic behaviour for Tikhonov-like dynamical equilibrium systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (3) : 373-401. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018019
[18]	Wen Si, Fenfen Wang, Jianguo Si. Almost-periodic perturbations of non-hyperbolic equilibrium points via Pöschel-Rüssmann KAM method. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 541-585. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020027
[19]	Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133-140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133
[20]	Hongyu He, Naohiro Kato. Equilibrium submanifold for a biological system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1429-1441. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1429

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors