Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

Previous Article
Existence and asymptotic behaviors of traveling waves of a modified vector-disease model
CPAA Home
This Issue
Next Article
A quasilinear parabolic problem with a source term and a nonlocal absorption

September 2018, 17(5): 1921-1944. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018091

Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing

1.	Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
2.	School of Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

* Corresponding author

Received August 2017 Revised December 2017 Published April 2018

This work is concerned with the following nonautonomous evolutionary system on a Banach space

$X$

${x_t} + Ax = f\left( {x, h\left( t \right)} \right), \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left( {0.1} \right)$

where

$A$

is a hyperbolic sectorial operator on

$X$

, the nonlinearity

$f \in C({X^\alpha } \times X,X)$

is Lipschitz in the first variable, the nonautonomous forcing

$h \in C(\mathbb{R},X)$

$\mu $

-subexponentially growing for some

$\mu >0$

(see (3.4) below for definition). Under some reasonable assumptions, we first establish an existence result for a unique nonautonomous hyperbolic equilibrium for the system in the framework of cocycle semiflows. We then demonstrate that the system exhibits a global synchronising behavior with the nonautonomous forcing

$h$

as time varies. Finally, we apply the abstract results to stochastic partial differential equations with additive white noise and obtain stochastic hyperbolic equilibria for the corresponding systems.

Keywords: Nonautonomous dynamical systems, nonautonomous hyperbolic equilibrium, invariant manifolds of equilibrium, stochastic hyperbolic equilibrium, global synchronising behavior.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 37B55, 37D05, 37L55, 34D06, 37D10.

Citation: Xuewei Ju, Desheng Li. Global synchronising behavior of evolution equations with exponentially growing nonautonomous forcing. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (5) : 1921-1944. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018091

References:

[1]	L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[2]	P. Brune and B. Schmalfuss, Inertial manifolds for stochastic pde with dynamical boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 10 (2011), 831-846. Google Scholar
[3]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-Dimensional Non-Autonomous Dynamical Systems, Appl. Math. Sci. 182, 2013.Google Scholar
[4]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa, J. C. Robinson and A. Suárez, Characterization of nonautonomous attractors of a perturbed gradient system, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 570-603. Google Scholar
[5]	A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, An extension of the concept of gradient semigroups which is stable under perturbation, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 2646-2668. Google Scholar
[6]	T. Caraballo, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, Exponentially stable stationary solutions for stochastic evolution equations and their perturbation, Appl. Math. Optim., 50 (2004), 183-207. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and Z. X. Liu, Gradient infinite-dimensional random dynamical system, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2012), 1817-1847. Google Scholar
[8]	X. Chen and J. Duan, State space decomposition for non-autonomous dynamical systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 141 (2011), 957-974. Google Scholar
[9]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar
[10]	D. Cheban, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, The relation between pullback and global attractors for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2 (2002), 125-144. Google Scholar
[11]	E. R. Arag$\tilde{a}$o-Costa, T. Caraballo, A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, Stability of gradient semigroups under perturbation, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 2099-2117. Google Scholar
[12]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. Google Scholar
[13]	H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 9 (1997), 307-341. Google Scholar
[14]	G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
[15]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial differential equations, Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. Google Scholar
[16]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Smooth stable and unstable manifolds for stochastic evolutionary equations, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 16 (2004), 949-972. Google Scholar
[17]	J. Duan and W. Wang, Effective Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2014.Google Scholar
[18]	J. K. Hale, Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., R. I., 1989.Google Scholar
[19]	D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Math. 840, Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
[20]	D. S. Li and X. X. Zhang, On dynamical properties of general dynamical systems and differential inclusions, J. Appl. Math. Anal. Appl., 274 (2002), 705-724. Google Scholar
[21]	D. S. Li and J. Duan, Structure of the set of bounded solutions for a class of nonautonomous second-order differential equations, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1754-1773. Google Scholar
[22]	D. S. Li, Morse theory of attractors via Lyapunov functions, preprint, arXiv: 1003.0305v1.Google Scholar
[23]	K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic wave equations, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 460-492. Google Scholar
[24]	J. C. Robinson, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
[25]	M. I. Vishik, S. V. Zelik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Regular attractors and nonautonomous perturbations of them, Mat. Sb., 204 (2013), 1-42. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[2]	P. Brune and B. Schmalfuss, Inertial manifolds for stochastic pde with dynamical boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 10 (2011), 831-846. Google Scholar
[3]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-Dimensional Non-Autonomous Dynamical Systems, Appl. Math. Sci. 182, 2013.Google Scholar
[4]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa, J. C. Robinson and A. Suárez, Characterization of nonautonomous attractors of a perturbed gradient system, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 570-603. Google Scholar
[5]	A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, An extension of the concept of gradient semigroups which is stable under perturbation, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 2646-2668. Google Scholar
[6]	T. Caraballo, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, Exponentially stable stationary solutions for stochastic evolution equations and their perturbation, Appl. Math. Optim., 50 (2004), 183-207. Google Scholar
[7]	T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa and Z. X. Liu, Gradient infinite-dimensional random dynamical system, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 11 (2012), 1817-1847. Google Scholar
[8]	X. Chen and J. Duan, State space decomposition for non-autonomous dynamical systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 141 (2011), 957-974. Google Scholar
[9]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar
[10]	D. Cheban, P. Kloeden and B. Schmalfuss, The relation between pullback and global attractors for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2 (2002), 125-144. Google Scholar
[11]	E. R. Arag$\tilde{a}$o-Costa, T. Caraballo, A. N. Carvalho and J. A. Langa, Stability of gradient semigroups under perturbation, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 2099-2117. Google Scholar
[12]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. Google Scholar
[13]	H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 9 (1997), 307-341. Google Scholar
[14]	G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
[15]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial differential equations, Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. Google Scholar
[16]	J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Smooth stable and unstable manifolds for stochastic evolutionary equations, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 16 (2004), 949-972. Google Scholar
[17]	J. Duan and W. Wang, Effective Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2014.Google Scholar
[18]	J. K. Hale, Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., R. I., 1989.Google Scholar
[19]	D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Math. 840, Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
[20]	D. S. Li and X. X. Zhang, On dynamical properties of general dynamical systems and differential inclusions, J. Appl. Math. Anal. Appl., 274 (2002), 705-724. Google Scholar
[21]	D. S. Li and J. Duan, Structure of the set of bounded solutions for a class of nonautonomous second-order differential equations, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1754-1773. Google Scholar
[22]	D. S. Li, Morse theory of attractors via Lyapunov functions, preprint, arXiv: 1003.0305v1.Google Scholar
[23]	K. Lu and B. Schmalfuss, Invariant manifolds for stochastic wave equations, J. Differential Equations, 236 (2007), 460-492. Google Scholar
[24]	J. C. Robinson, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
[25]	M. I. Vishik, S. V. Zelik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Regular attractors and nonautonomous perturbations of them, Mat. Sb., 204 (2013), 1-42. Google Scholar

[1]	Ivan Werner. Equilibrium states and invariant measures for random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (3) : 1285-1326. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.1285
[2]	Alexander Arbieto, Luciano Prudente. Uniqueness of equilibrium states for some partially hyperbolic horseshoes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (1) : 27-40. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.27
[3]	Tatsien Li, Zhiqiang Wang. A note on the exact controllability for nonautonomous hyperbolic systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (1) : 229-235. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.229
[4]	Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Existence and asymptotic behaviour for solutions of dynamical equilibrium systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (1) : 1-14. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.1
[5]	MirosŁaw Lachowicz, Tatiana Ryabukha. Equilibrium solutions for microscopic stochastic systems in population dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 777-786. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.777
[6]	David Cheban. Global attractors of nonautonomous quasihomogeneous dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 96-101. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.96
[7]	Junxiang Xu. On quasi-periodic perturbations of hyperbolic-type degenerate equilibrium point of a class of planar systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (6) : 2593-2619. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2593
[8]	Arne Ogrowsky, Björn Schmalfuss. Unstable invariant manifolds for a nonautonomous differential equation with nonautonomous unbounded delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (6) : 1663-1681. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1663
[9]	Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579
[10]	Yejuan Wang, Chengkui Zhong, Shengfan Zhou. Pullback attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (3) : 587-614. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.587
[11]	Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Approximation of attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (2) : 215-238. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.215
[12]	Alessandro Fortunati, Stephen Wiggins. Normal forms à la Moser for aperiodically time-dependent Hamiltonians in the vicinity of a hyperbolic equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 1109-1118. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016044
[13]	Mohammadreza Molaei. Hyperbolic dynamics of discrete dynamical systems on pseudo-riemannian manifolds. Electronic Research Announcements, 2018, 25: 8-15. doi: 10.3934/era.2018.25.002
[14]	Aicha Balhag, Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Existence and continuous-discrete asymptotic behaviour for Tikhonov-like dynamical equilibrium systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (3) : 373-401. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018019
[15]	Björn Schmalfuss. Attractors for nonautonomous and random dynamical systems perturbed by impulses. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (3) : 727-744. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.727
[16]	Hongyong Cui, Peter E. Kloeden, Meihua Yang. Forward omega limit sets of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 1-12. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020065
[17]	Wen Si, Fenfen Wang, Jianguo Si. Almost-periodic perturbations of non-hyperbolic equilibrium points via Pöschel-Rüssmann KAM method. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 541-585. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020027
[18]	Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133-140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133
[19]	Hongyu He, Naohiro Kato. Equilibrium submanifold for a biological system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (6) : 1429-1441. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1429
[20]	Alain Chenciner. The angular momentum of a relative equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (3) : 1033-1047. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1033

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences