• Previous Article
    Convergence of nonautonomous multivalued problems with large diffusion to ordinary differential inclusions
  • CPAA Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    The stampacchia maximum principle for stochastic partial differential equations forced by lévy noise
April  2020, 19(4): 2333-2346. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020101

Analysis of an anaerobic digestion model in landfill with mortality term

1. 

Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Natural Resources and Environment, Ibn Tofaïl University, Kénitra, Morocco

2. 

IRIMAS, University of Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France, University of Strasbourg, France

3. 

LBE, University of Montpellier, INRA, Narbonne, France

4. 

MISTEA, University of Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France

5. 

University of Haute-Alsace, IRIMAS UR 7499, F-68100 Mulhouse, France, University of Strasbourg, France

*Corresponding author

Dedicated to Professor Tomás Caraballo on the occasion of his 60-th birthday

Received  August 2019 Revised  October 2019 Published  January 2020

We study a mathematical model of anaerobic digestion with biomass recirculation, dedicated to landfill problems, and analyze its asymptotic behavior. We show that the global attractor is composed of an infinity of non-hyperbolic equilibria. For non-monotonic growth functions, this set is non connected, which impacts the performances of the bioprocess.

Citation: S. Ouchtout, Z. Mghazli, J. Harmand, A. Rapaport, Z. Belhachmi. Analysis of an anaerobic digestion model in landfill with mortality term. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (4) : 2333-2346. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020101
References:
[1]

J. Andrews, A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10 (1968), 707–723. Google Scholar

[2]

J. Arzate, M. Kirstein, F. Ertem, E. Kielhorn, H. Malule, P. Neubauer, M. Cruz-Bournazou and S. Junne, Anaerobic digestion model (AM2) for the description of biogas processes at dynamic feedstock loading rates, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 89 (2017), 686–695. Google Scholar

[3]

I. Barbalat, Systèmes d'équations différentielles d'oscillations non linéaires, Rev. Math. Pures Appl., 4 (1959), 267–270.  Google Scholar

[4]

G. Bastin and D. Dochain, On-line Estimation and Adaptive Control of Bioreactors, Dynamics of Microbial Competition, Elsevier Science Publishers, New-York, 1991. Google Scholar

[5]

B. Benyahia, T. Sari, B. Cherki and J. Harmand, Bifurcation and stability analysis of a two step model for monitoring anaerobic digestion processes, Journal of Process Control, 22 (2012), 1008–1019. Google Scholar

[6]

O. Bernard, Z. Hadj-Sadok, D. Dochain, A. Genovesi and J. P. Steyer, Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 75 (2001), 424–438. Google Scholar

[7]

J. Carr, Applications of Centre Manifold Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1981.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. Chenu, Modélisation des transferts réactifs de masse et de chaleur dans les installations de stockage de déchets ménagers: application aux installations de type bioréacteur, PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, France, 2007. Google Scholar

[9]

I. DidiH. Dib and B. Cherki, A Luenberger-type observer for the AM2 model, Journal of Process Control, 32 (2015), 117-126.   Google Scholar

[10]

D. Dochain, Automatic Control of Bioprocesses Control systems, John Wiley and Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[11]

G. Dollé, O. Duran, N. Feyeux, E. Frénod, M. Giacomini and C. Prud'Homme, Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of a bioreactor landfill using Feel++, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 55 (2016), 83–110.  Google Scholar

[12]

R. Fekih-SalemJ. HarmandC. LobryA. Rapaport and T. Sari, Extensions of the chemostat model with flocculation, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 397 (2013), 292-306.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.055.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. Harmand, C. Lobry, A. Rapaport and T. Sari, The Chemostat: Mathematical Theory of Microorganisms Cultures, ISTE Wiley, 2017.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. Hassam, E. Ficara, A. Leva and J. Harmand, A generic and systematic procedure to derive a simplified model from the anaerobic digestion model, No. 1 (ADM1), Biochemical Engineering Journal, 99 (2015), 193–203. Google Scholar

[15]

M. Hmissi, J. Harmand, V. Alcaraz-Gonzalez and H. Shayeb, Evaluation of alkalinity spatial distribution in an up-flow fixed bed anaerobic digester, Water Science and Technology, 77 (2018), 948–959. Google Scholar

[16]

S. J. Jang and J. Baglama, Nutrient-plankton models with nutrient recycling, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 49 (2005), 375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.03.013.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Loreau, Material cycling and the stability of ecosystems, The American Naturalist, 143 (1994), 508–513. Google Scholar

[18]

J. Monod, La technique de la culture continue: Théorie et applications, Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Lille, 79 (1950), 390–410. Google Scholar

[19]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer, 3rd ed., 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0392-3.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Rapaport, T. Bayen, M. Sebbah, A. Donoso-Bravo and A. Torrico, Dynamical modelling and optimal control of landfills, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 26 (2016), 901–929. doi: 10.1142/S0218202516500214.  Google Scholar

[21]

A. Rapaport, T. Nidelet, S. El Aida and J. Harmand, About biomass overyielding of mixed cultures in batch processes, Prepint hal, (2019). Google Scholar

[22]

A. Rapaport, T. Nidelet and J. Harmand, About biomass overyielding of mixed cultures in batch processes, in, 8th IFAC Conference on Foundations of Systems Biology in Engineering (FOSBE), Valencia, Spain, 15-18 Oct., (2019). Google Scholar

[23]

M. Rouez, Dégradation anaérobie de déchets solides: Caractérisation, facteurs d'influence et modélisations, PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Lyon, France, 2008. Google Scholar

[24]

W. Walter, Ordinary Differential Equations, Springer, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0601-9.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

J. Andrews, A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10 (1968), 707–723. Google Scholar

[2]

J. Arzate, M. Kirstein, F. Ertem, E. Kielhorn, H. Malule, P. Neubauer, M. Cruz-Bournazou and S. Junne, Anaerobic digestion model (AM2) for the description of biogas processes at dynamic feedstock loading rates, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 89 (2017), 686–695. Google Scholar

[3]

I. Barbalat, Systèmes d'équations différentielles d'oscillations non linéaires, Rev. Math. Pures Appl., 4 (1959), 267–270.  Google Scholar

[4]

G. Bastin and D. Dochain, On-line Estimation and Adaptive Control of Bioreactors, Dynamics of Microbial Competition, Elsevier Science Publishers, New-York, 1991. Google Scholar

[5]

B. Benyahia, T. Sari, B. Cherki and J. Harmand, Bifurcation and stability analysis of a two step model for monitoring anaerobic digestion processes, Journal of Process Control, 22 (2012), 1008–1019. Google Scholar

[6]

O. Bernard, Z. Hadj-Sadok, D. Dochain, A. Genovesi and J. P. Steyer, Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 75 (2001), 424–438. Google Scholar

[7]

J. Carr, Applications of Centre Manifold Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1981.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. Chenu, Modélisation des transferts réactifs de masse et de chaleur dans les installations de stockage de déchets ménagers: application aux installations de type bioréacteur, PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, France, 2007. Google Scholar

[9]

I. DidiH. Dib and B. Cherki, A Luenberger-type observer for the AM2 model, Journal of Process Control, 32 (2015), 117-126.   Google Scholar

[10]

D. Dochain, Automatic Control of Bioprocesses Control systems, John Wiley and Sons, 2010. Google Scholar

[11]

G. Dollé, O. Duran, N. Feyeux, E. Frénod, M. Giacomini and C. Prud'Homme, Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of a bioreactor landfill using Feel++, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 55 (2016), 83–110.  Google Scholar

[12]

R. Fekih-SalemJ. HarmandC. LobryA. Rapaport and T. Sari, Extensions of the chemostat model with flocculation, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 397 (2013), 292-306.  doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.055.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. Harmand, C. Lobry, A. Rapaport and T. Sari, The Chemostat: Mathematical Theory of Microorganisms Cultures, ISTE Wiley, 2017.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. Hassam, E. Ficara, A. Leva and J. Harmand, A generic and systematic procedure to derive a simplified model from the anaerobic digestion model, No. 1 (ADM1), Biochemical Engineering Journal, 99 (2015), 193–203. Google Scholar

[15]

M. Hmissi, J. Harmand, V. Alcaraz-Gonzalez and H. Shayeb, Evaluation of alkalinity spatial distribution in an up-flow fixed bed anaerobic digester, Water Science and Technology, 77 (2018), 948–959. Google Scholar

[16]

S. J. Jang and J. Baglama, Nutrient-plankton models with nutrient recycling, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 49 (2005), 375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.03.013.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Loreau, Material cycling and the stability of ecosystems, The American Naturalist, 143 (1994), 508–513. Google Scholar

[18]

J. Monod, La technique de la culture continue: Théorie et applications, Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Lille, 79 (1950), 390–410. Google Scholar

[19]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer, 3rd ed., 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0392-3.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Rapaport, T. Bayen, M. Sebbah, A. Donoso-Bravo and A. Torrico, Dynamical modelling and optimal control of landfills, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 26 (2016), 901–929. doi: 10.1142/S0218202516500214.  Google Scholar

[21]

A. Rapaport, T. Nidelet, S. El Aida and J. Harmand, About biomass overyielding of mixed cultures in batch processes, Prepint hal, (2019). Google Scholar

[22]

A. Rapaport, T. Nidelet and J. Harmand, About biomass overyielding of mixed cultures in batch processes, in, 8th IFAC Conference on Foundations of Systems Biology in Engineering (FOSBE), Valencia, Spain, 15-18 Oct., (2019). Google Scholar

[23]

M. Rouez, Dégradation anaérobie de déchets solides: Caractérisation, facteurs d'influence et modélisations, PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Lyon, France, 2008. Google Scholar

[24]

W. Walter, Ordinary Differential Equations, Springer, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0601-9.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Overall scheme of the anaerobic degradation of organic matter
Figure 2.  Graphs of Monod and Haldane functions
Figure 3.  Graph of the Haldane function considered in the example
Figure 4.  Graph of $ S(\cdot) $ for initial conditions $ X_0 = 340 $ to $ X_0 = 360 $ with a step of 5
Figure 5.  Threshold on $ X_0 $ as a function of $ K_d $ for model parameters indicated in Table 1
Figure 6.  Biogas production as a function of $ X_0 $ for $ K_d = 0.02 $
Figure 7.  $ \lambda^- $, $ \lambda^+ $ (on top) $ {\rm Biogas}^- $ and $ {\rm Biogas}^+ $ (on bottom) as functions of $ K_d $
$ K_h$ $Y $ $f_1 $ $ f_2$ $ \alpha$
0.176 0.05 0.7 0.76 0.9
$ K_h$ $Y $ $f_1 $ $ f_2$ $ \alpha$
0.176 0.05 0.7 0.76 0.9
[1]

Wen Si, Fenfen Wang, Jianguo Si. Almost-periodic perturbations of non-hyperbolic equilibrium points via Pöschel-Rüssmann KAM method. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 541-585. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020027

[2]

Pablo G. Barrientos, Artem Raibekas. Robustly non-hyperbolic transitive symplectic dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (12) : 5993-6013. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018259

[3]

Zhicong Liu. SRB attractors with intermingled basins for non-hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (4) : 1545-1562. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1545

[4]

Vanderlei Horita, Marcelo Viana. Hausdorff dimension for non-hyperbolic repellers II: DA diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (5) : 1125-1152. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.1125

[5]

Anna Cima, Armengol Gasull, Víctor Mañosa. Parrondo's dynamic paradox for the stability of non-hyperbolic fixed points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (2) : 889-904. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018038

[6]

Katrin Gelfert. Non-hyperbolic behavior of geodesic flows of rank 1 surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (1) : 521-551. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019022

[7]

Bernard Dacorogna, Alessandro Ferriero. Regularity and selecting principles for implicit ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (1) : 87-101. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.87

[8]

Zvi Artstein. Averaging of ordinary differential equations with slowly varying averages. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 353-365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.353

[9]

Inmaculada Baldomá, Ernest Fontich, Pau Martín. Gevrey estimates for one dimensional parabolic invariant manifolds of non-hyperbolic fixed points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (8) : 4159-4190. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017177

[10]

Yongluo Cao, Stefano Luzzatto, Isabel Rios. Some non-hyperbolic systems with strictly non-zero Lyapunov exponents for all invariant measures: Horseshoes with internal tangencies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (1) : 61-71. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.61

[11]

W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209

[12]

Stefano Maset. Conditioning and relative error propagation in linear autonomous ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (7) : 2879-2909. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018165

[13]

Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040

[14]

Hongwei Lou, Weihan Wang. Optimal blowup/quenching time for controlled autonomous ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 517-527. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.517

[15]

Jean Mawhin, James R. Ward Jr. Guiding-like functions for periodic or bounded solutions of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 39-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.39

[16]

Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283

[17]

Alessandro Fonda, Fabio Zanolin. Bounded solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (1) : 91-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.91

[18]

Bin Wang, Arieh Iserles. Dirichlet series for dynamical systems of first-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 281-298. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.281

[19]

Ping Lin, Weihan Wang. Optimal control problems for some ordinary differential equations with behavior of blowup or quenching. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 809-828. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018036

[20]

Jan-Hendrik Webert, Philip E. Gill, Sven-Joachim Kimmerle, Matthias Gerdts. A study of structure-exploiting SQP algorithms for an optimal control problem with coupled hyperbolic and ordinary differential equation constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1259-1282. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018071

2018 Impact Factor: 0.925

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (50)
  • HTML views (35)
  • Cited by (0)

[Back to Top]