• Previous Article
    Global dynamics for a class of reaction-diffusion equations with distributed delay and neumann condition
  • CPAA Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Strong convergence of trajectory attractors for reaction–diffusion systems with random rapidly oscillating terms
May  2020, 19(5): 2445-2471. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020107

Uniform a priori estimates for elliptic problems with impedance boundary conditions

1. 

Inria Sophia Antipolis Méditerranée, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Valbonne, France

2. 

Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonné UMR CNRS 7351, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2, France

3. 

LAMAV, FR CNRS 2956, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, F-59313 - Valenciennes Cedex 9, France

* Corresponding author

Received  August 2018 Revised  September 2019 Published  March 2020

We derive stability estimates in $ H^2 $ for elliptic problems with impedance boundary conditions that are uniform with respect to the impedance coefficient. Such estimates are of importance to establish sharp error estimates for finite element discretizations of contact impedance and high-frequency Helm-holtz problems. Though stability in $ H^2 $ is easily obtained by employing a ``bootstrap'' argument and well-established result for the corresponding Neumann problem, this strategy leads to a stability constant that increases with the impedance coefficient. Here, we propose alternative proofs to derive sharp and uniform stability constants for domains that are convex or smooth.

Citation: Théophile Chaumont-Frelet, Serge Nicaise, Jérôme Tomezyk. Uniform a priori estimates for elliptic problems with impedance boundary conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (5) : 2445-2471. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020107
References:
[1]

G. AlessandriniA. Morassi and E. Rosset, The linear constraints in Poincaré and Korn type inequalities, Forum Math., 20 (2008), 557-569.  doi: 10.1515/FORUM.2008.028.

[2]

I. Babuška, Error-bounds for finite element method, Numer. Math., 16 (1970/1971), 322-333.  doi: 10.1007/BF02165003.

[3]

H. BarucqT. Chaumont-Frelet and C. Gout, Stability analysis of heterogeneous Helmholtz problems and finite element solution based on propagation media approximation, Math. Comput., 86 (2017), 2129-2157.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3165.

[4]

H. Brezis, Functional Analysis Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, 2011.

[5]

T. Chaumont-Frelet and S. Nicaise, High-frequency behaviour of corner singularities in Helmholtz problems, ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal.-Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 52 (2018), 1803-1845.  doi: 10.1051/m2an/2018031.

[6]

M. Costabel and M. Dauge, A singularly perturbed mixed boundary value problem, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 21 (1996), 1919-1949.  doi: 10.1080/03605309608821249.

[7]

J. Dardé and S. Staboulis, Electrode modelling: the effect of contact impedance, ISO: ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal.-Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 50 (2016), 415-431.  doi: 10.1051/m2an/2015049.

[8]

X. Feng and H. Wu, hp-discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Helmholtz equation with large wave number, Math. Comput., 80 (2011), 1997-2024.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2011-02475-0.

[9]

P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 24, Pitman, Boston–London–Melbourne, 1985.

[10]

N. Hyvönen, Complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography: approximation properties and characterization of inclusions, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 902-931.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139903423303.

[11]

N. Hyvönen and L. Mustonen, Smoothened complete electrode model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 77 (2017), 2250-2271.  doi: 10.1137/17M1124292.

[12]

H. C. KaiserH. Neidhardt and J. Rehberg, Macroscopic current induced boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type operators, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 45 (2003), 39-63.  doi: 10.1007/BF02789593.

[13]

J. Kim and D. Sheen, A priori estimates for elliptic boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions, preprint 1304, Univ. Minnesota, 1995.

[14]

J. Kim and D. Sheen, Regularity of solutions to Helmholtz-type problems with absorbing boundary conditions in nonsmooth domains, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 34 (1997), 135-146. 

[15]

N. G. Meyers, Integral inequalities of Poincaré and Wirtinger type, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 68 (1978), 113-120.  doi: 10.1007/BF00281405.

[16]

E. SomersaloM. Cheney and D. Isaacson, Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), 1023-1040.  doi: 10.1137/0152060.

[17]

R. TezaurI. Kalashnikova and C. Farhat, The discontinuous enrichment method for medium-frequency Helmholtz problems with a spatially variable wavenumber, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 268 (2013), 126-140.  doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.017.

[18]

W. L. WendlandE. Stephan and G. C. Hsiao, On the integral equation method for the plane mixed boundary value problem of the Laplacian, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 1 (1979), 265-321.  doi: 10.1002/mma.1670010302.

[19]

H. Wu, Pre-asymptotic error analysis of CIP-FEM and FEM for the Helmholtz equation with high wave number. part Ⅰ: linear version, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 34 (2014), 1266-1288.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/drt033.

[20]

L. Zhu and H. Wu, Pre-asymptotic error analysis of CIP-FEM and FEM for the Helmholtz equation with high wave number. part Ⅱ: hp version, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 51 (2013), 1828-1852.  doi: 10.1137/120874643.

show all references

References:
[1]

G. AlessandriniA. Morassi and E. Rosset, The linear constraints in Poincaré and Korn type inequalities, Forum Math., 20 (2008), 557-569.  doi: 10.1515/FORUM.2008.028.

[2]

I. Babuška, Error-bounds for finite element method, Numer. Math., 16 (1970/1971), 322-333.  doi: 10.1007/BF02165003.

[3]

H. BarucqT. Chaumont-Frelet and C. Gout, Stability analysis of heterogeneous Helmholtz problems and finite element solution based on propagation media approximation, Math. Comput., 86 (2017), 2129-2157.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3165.

[4]

H. Brezis, Functional Analysis Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, 2011.

[5]

T. Chaumont-Frelet and S. Nicaise, High-frequency behaviour of corner singularities in Helmholtz problems, ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal.-Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 52 (2018), 1803-1845.  doi: 10.1051/m2an/2018031.

[6]

M. Costabel and M. Dauge, A singularly perturbed mixed boundary value problem, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 21 (1996), 1919-1949.  doi: 10.1080/03605309608821249.

[7]

J. Dardé and S. Staboulis, Electrode modelling: the effect of contact impedance, ISO: ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal.-Model. Math. Anal. Numer., 50 (2016), 415-431.  doi: 10.1051/m2an/2015049.

[8]

X. Feng and H. Wu, hp-discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Helmholtz equation with large wave number, Math. Comput., 80 (2011), 1997-2024.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2011-02475-0.

[9]

P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 24, Pitman, Boston–London–Melbourne, 1985.

[10]

N. Hyvönen, Complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography: approximation properties and characterization of inclusions, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2004), 902-931.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139903423303.

[11]

N. Hyvönen and L. Mustonen, Smoothened complete electrode model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 77 (2017), 2250-2271.  doi: 10.1137/17M1124292.

[12]

H. C. KaiserH. Neidhardt and J. Rehberg, Macroscopic current induced boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type operators, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 45 (2003), 39-63.  doi: 10.1007/BF02789593.

[13]

J. Kim and D. Sheen, A priori estimates for elliptic boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions, preprint 1304, Univ. Minnesota, 1995.

[14]

J. Kim and D. Sheen, Regularity of solutions to Helmholtz-type problems with absorbing boundary conditions in nonsmooth domains, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 34 (1997), 135-146. 

[15]

N. G. Meyers, Integral inequalities of Poincaré and Wirtinger type, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 68 (1978), 113-120.  doi: 10.1007/BF00281405.

[16]

E. SomersaloM. Cheney and D. Isaacson, Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), 1023-1040.  doi: 10.1137/0152060.

[17]

R. TezaurI. Kalashnikova and C. Farhat, The discontinuous enrichment method for medium-frequency Helmholtz problems with a spatially variable wavenumber, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 268 (2013), 126-140.  doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.017.

[18]

W. L. WendlandE. Stephan and G. C. Hsiao, On the integral equation method for the plane mixed boundary value problem of the Laplacian, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 1 (1979), 265-321.  doi: 10.1002/mma.1670010302.

[19]

H. Wu, Pre-asymptotic error analysis of CIP-FEM and FEM for the Helmholtz equation with high wave number. part Ⅰ: linear version, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 34 (2014), 1266-1288.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/drt033.

[20]

L. Zhu and H. Wu, Pre-asymptotic error analysis of CIP-FEM and FEM for the Helmholtz equation with high wave number. part Ⅱ: hp version, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 51 (2013), 1828-1852.  doi: 10.1137/120874643.

Figure 1.  Examples of domains with an obstacle satisfying Assumptions 1 and 2 with $ \Gamma_{{\rm{Diss}}} $ convex
Figure 2.  Examples of domains with an obstacle satisfying Assumptions 1 and 2 with $ \Gamma_{{\rm{Diss}}} $ smooth
Figure 3.  Examples of cavities satisfying Assumptions 1 and 2
Figure 4.  Exceptional cavity satisfying Theorem 5.1
[1]

Yosra Boukari, Houssem Haddar. The factorization method applied to cracks with impedance boundary conditions. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2013, 7 (4) : 1123-1138. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1123

[2]

Vandana Sharma. Global existence and uniform estimates of solutions to reaction diffusion systems with mass transport type boundary conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 955-974. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021001

[3]

Angelo Favini, Rabah Labbas, Keddour Lemrabet, Stéphane Maingot, Hassan D. Sidibé. Resolution and optimal regularity for a biharmonic equation with impedance boundary conditions and some generalizations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (11&12) : 4991-5014. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4991

[4]

Laurent Bourgeois, Houssem Haddar. Identification of generalized impedance boundary conditions in inverse scattering problems. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2010, 4 (1) : 19-38. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2010.4.19

[5]

Daniela Calvetti, Paul J. Hadwin, Janne M. J. Huttunen, Jari P. Kaipio, Erkki Somersalo. Artificial boundary conditions and domain truncation in electrical impedance tomography. Part II: Stochastic extension of the boundary map. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2015, 9 (3) : 767-789. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.767

[6]

Daniela Calvetti, Paul J. Hadwin, Janne M. J. Huttunen, David Isaacson, Jari P. Kaipio, Debra McGivney, Erkki Somersalo, Joseph Volzer. Artificial boundary conditions and domain truncation in electrical impedance tomography. Part I: Theory and preliminary results. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2015, 9 (3) : 749-766. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.749

[7]

Florian Monteghetti, Ghislain Haine, Denis Matignon. Asymptotic stability of the multidimensional wave equation coupled with classes of positive-real impedance boundary conditions. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2019, 9 (4) : 759-791. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019049

[8]

Jinju Xu. A new proof of gradient estimates for mean curvature equations with oblique boundary conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (5) : 1719-1742. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016010

[9]

Tae Gab Ha. Global existence and general decay estimates for the viscoelastic equation with acoustic boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (12) : 6899-6919. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016100

[10]

Younghun Hong, Changhun Yang. Uniform Strichartz estimates on the lattice. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (6) : 3239-3264. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019134

[11]

Huafei Di, Yadong Shang, Jiali Yu. Existence and uniform decay estimates for the fourth order wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping and interior source. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (1) : 221-261. doi: 10.3934/era.2020015

[12]

Catherine Lebiedzik. Uniform stability in a vectorial full Von Kármán thermoelastic system with solenoidal dissipation and free boundary conditions. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2021, 10 (4) : 767-796. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020092

[13]

Ville Kolehmainen, Matti Lassas, Petri Ola, Samuli Siltanen. Recovering boundary shape and conductivity in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 217-242. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.217

[14]

Raúl Ferreira, Julio D. Rossi. Decay estimates for a nonlocal $p-$Laplacian evolution problem with mixed boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (4) : 1469-1478. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.1469

[15]

Sándor Kelemen, Pavol Quittner. Boundedness and a priori estimates of solutions to elliptic systems with Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (3) : 731-740. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.731

[16]

Nguyen Thanh Long, Hoang Hai Ha, Le Thi Phuong Ngoc, Nguyen Anh Triet. Existence, blow-up and exponential decay estimates for a system of nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 455-492. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020023

[17]

Dimitri Mugnai, Kanishka Perera, Edoardo Proietti Lippi. A priori estimates for the Fractional p-Laplacian with nonlocal Neumann boundary conditions and applications. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2022, 21 (1) : 275-292. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021177

[18]

Haigang Li, Jenn-Nan Wang, Ling Wang. Refined stability estimates in electrical impedance tomography with multi-layer structure. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2022, 16 (1) : 229-249. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021048

[19]

Raffaela Capitanelli, Maria Agostina Vivaldi. Uniform weighted estimates on pre-fractal domains. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (7) : 1969-1985. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.1969

[20]

Michele Carriero, Antonio Leaci, Franco Tomarelli. Uniform density estimates for Blake & Zisserman functional. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (4) : 1129-1150. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1129

2021 Impact Factor: 1.273

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (266)
  • HTML views (117)
  • Cited by (2)

[Back to Top]