American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  1997, 3(2): 265-288. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.265

Concerning the well-posedness of a nonlinearly coupled semilinear wave and beam--like equation

George Avalos 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-1042, United States

Received  October 1995 Revised  May 1996 Published  January 1997

In this work, we show the local existence and uniqueness of a coupled hyperbolic/parabolic system, where the coupling is partially accomplished through a strongly nonlinear term of polynomial growth. We show ultimately that the degree of the nonlinearity allowed depends upon the smoothness of a "piece" of the initial data and the geometry where the equations take place, and under a relatively mild imposition of smoothness, one can solve the system for nonlinearities of arbitrary polynomial bound.
Keywords: Hyperbolic/parabolic system, semilinear wave and beam-like equation..
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35M10, 35D05, 35B37.
Citation: George Avalos. Concerning the well-posedness of a nonlinearly coupled semilinear wave and beam--like equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1997, 3 (2) : 265-288. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.265
[1]

Kun Li, Jianhua Huang, Xiong Li. Traveling wave solutions in advection hyperbolic-parabolic system with nonlocal delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (6) : 2091-2119. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018227
[2]

Enrique Fernández-Cara, Manuel González-Burgos, Luz de Teresa. Null-exact controllability of a semilinear cascade system of parabolic-hyperbolic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (3) : 639-658. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.639
[3]

Sérgio S. Rodrigues. Semiglobal exponential stabilization of nonautonomous semilinear parabolic-like systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020027
[4]

Vladimir V. Chepyzhov, Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for the hyperbolic relaxation of semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1115-1142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019009
[5]

Michiel Bertsch, Danielle Hilhorst, Hirofumi Izuhara, Masayasu Mimura, Tohru Wakasa. A nonlinear parabolic-hyperbolic system for contact inhibition and a degenerate parabolic fisher kpp equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 0 (0) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019226
[6]

Jitka Machalová, Horymír Netuka. Optimal control of system governed by the Gao beam equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 783-792. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0783
[7]

Jong-Shenq Guo, Satoshi Sasayama, Chi-Jen Wang. Blowup rate estimate for a system of semilinear parabolic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (2) : 711-718. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.711
[8]

Minkyu Kwak, Kyong Yu. The asymptotic behavior of solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1996, 2 (4) : 483-496. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.483
[9]

Andrei Fursikov. The simplest semilinear parabolic equation of normal type. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (2) : 141-170. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.141
[10]

Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Appearance of anomalous singularities in a semilinear parabolic equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 387-405. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.387
[11]

Zhengce Zhang, Bei Hu. Gradient blowup rate for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (2) : 767-779. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.767
[12]

Yang Cao, Jingxue Yin. Small perturbation of a semilinear pseudo-parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (2) : 631-642. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.631
[13]

Mourad Choulli, El Maati Ouhabaz, Masahiro Yamamoto. Stable determination of a semilinear term in a parabolic equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (3) : 447-462. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.447
[14]

Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Asymptotic behavior of singular solutions for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (11) : 4027-4043. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4027
[15]

Franck Boyer, Víctor Hernández-Santamaría, Luz De Teresa. Insensitizing controls for a semilinear parabolic equation: A numerical approach. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (1) : 117-158. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019007
[16]

Stéphane Gerbi, Belkacem Said-Houari. Exponential decay for solutions to semilinear damped wave equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2012, 5 (3) : 559-566. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.559
[17]

Maurizio Grasselli, Vittorino Pata. On the damped semilinear wave equation with critical exponent. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 351-358. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.351
[18]

Martin Michálek, Dalibor Pražák, Jakub Slavík. Semilinear damped wave equation in locally uniform spaces. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (5) : 1673-1695. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017080
[19]

Zhijian Yang, Zhiming Liu, Na Feng. Longtime behavior of the semilinear wave equation with gentle dissipation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (11) : 6557-6580. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016084
[20]

Mohamed Ouzahra. Controllability of the semilinear wave equation governed by a multiplicative control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (4) : 669-686. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019039

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (19)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences