American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  1999, 5(2): 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233

The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds

Y. Latushkin 1, and  B. Layton 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States, United States

Received  June 1998 Revised  June 1998 Published  January 1999

We give optimal gap conditions using Lipschitz constants of the nonlinear terms and growth bounds of the linear terms that imply the existence of infinite dimensional Lipschitz invariant manifolds for systems of semilinear equations on Banach spaces. This result improves and generalizes recent theorems by C. Foias and by N. Castañeda and R. Rosa. The result is also shown to imply the existence of invariant manifolds for nonautonomous equations and semilinear skew-product flows. Also, generalizations for smoothness of invariant manifolds are given.
Keywords: spectral gap conditions., Invariant manifolds.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 34CXX, 34DXX, 58FXX, 35BX.
Citation: Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233
[1]

Maciej J. Capiński, Piotr Zgliczyński. Cone conditions and covering relations for topologically normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (3) : 641-670. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.641
[2]

Bruno Colbois, Alexandre Girouard. The spectral gap of graphs and Steklov eigenvalues on surfaces. Electronic Research Announcements, 2014, 21: 19-27. doi: 10.3934/era.2014.21.19
[3]

Damien Thomine. A spectral gap for transfer operators of piecewise expanding maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (3) : 917-944. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.917
[4]

Rovella Alvaro, Vilamajó Francesc, Romero Neptalí. Invariant manifolds for delay endomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 35-50. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.35
[5]

Hugo Beirão da Veiga. A challenging open problem: The inviscid limit under slip-type boundary conditions.. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2010, 3 (2) : 231-236. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.231
[6]

José M. Arrieta, Simone M. Bruschi. Very rapidly varying boundaries in equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. The case of a non uniformly Lipschitz deformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 327-351. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.327
[7]

Sébastien Gouëzel. An interval map with a spectral gap on Lipschitz functions, but not on bounded variation functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 24 (4) : 1205-1208. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.1205
[8]

Jean-Pierre Conze, Y. Guivarc'h. Ergodicity of group actions and spectral gap, applications to random walks and Markov shifts. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (9) : 4239-4269. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4239
[9]

Soña Pavlíková, Daniel Ševčovič. On construction of upper and lower bounds for the HOMO-LUMO spectral gap. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2019, 9 (1) : 53-69. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019005
[10]

Shuang Chen, Jun Shen. Large spectral gap induced by small delay and its application to reduction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (7) : 4533-4564. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020190
[11]

Takeshi Saito, Kazuyuki Yagasaki. Chebyshev spectral methods for computing center manifolds. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (2) : 165-181. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021008
[12]

Piermarco Cannarsa, Patrick Martinez, Judith Vancostenoble. Precise estimates for biorthogonal families under asymptotic gap conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (5) : 1441-1472. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020082
[13]

José F. Alves, Davide Azevedo. Statistical properties of diffeomorphisms with weak invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (1) : 1-41. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1
[14]

George Osipenko. Indestructibility of invariant locally non-unique manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (2) : 203-219. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.203
[15]

Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133-140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133
[16]

Christopher K. R. T. Jones, Siu-Kei Tin. Generalized exchange lemmas and orbits heteroclinic to invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 967-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.967
[17]

Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (2) : 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579
[18]

Arturo Echeverría-Enríquez, Alberto Ibort, Miguel C. Muñoz-Lecanda, Narciso Román-Roy. Invariant forms and automorphisms of locally homogeneous multisymplectic manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (4) : 397-419. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.397
[19]

Roberto Castelli. Efficient representation of invariant manifolds of periodic orbits in the CRTBP. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 563-586. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018197
[20]

Pablo Aguirre, Bernd Krauskopf, Hinke M. Osinga. Global invariant manifolds near a Shilnikov homoclinic bifurcation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 1-38. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.1

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (64)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (13)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences