The Lorenz equation as a metaphor for the Navier-Stokes equations

Previous Article
Resynchronization of delayed neural networks
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Global structure of 2-D incompressible flows

April 2001, 7(2): 403-429. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403

The Lorenz equation as a metaphor for the Navier-Stokes equations

C. Foias ^1, , M. S Jolly ^1, , I. Kukavica ^2, and E. S. Titi ^3,

1.	Department of Mathematics, Indiana University,Bloomington, IN, 47405, United States, United States
2.	Department of Mathematics,, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1113, United States
3.	Department of Mathematics and Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States

Revised November 2000 Published January 2001

Abstract
Related Papers

Three approaches for the rigorous study of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) are applied to the Lorenz system. Analysis of time averaged solutions leads to a description of invariant probability measures on the Lorenz attractor which is much more complete than what is known for the NSE. As is the case for the NSE, solutions on the Lorenz attractor are analytic in a strip about the real time axis. Rigorous estimates are combined with numerical computation of Taylor coefficients to estimate the width of this strip. Approximate inertial forms originally developed for the NSE are analyzed for the Lorenz system, and the dynamics for the latter are completely described.

Keywords: Lorenz equation, Navier-Stokes, statistical solutions..

Mathematics Subject Classification: 34C40, 34M20,76D0.

Citation: C. Foias, M. S Jolly, I. Kukavica, E. S. Titi. The Lorenz equation as a metaphor for the Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2001, 7 (2) : 403-429. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403

[1]	Tomás Caraballo, Peter E. Kloeden, José Real. Invariant measures and Statistical solutions of the globally modified Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (4) : 761-781. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.761
[2]	Kuijie Li, Tohru Ozawa, Baoxiang Wang. Dynamical behavior for the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (4) : 1511-1560. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018073
[3]	P.E. Kloeden, Pedro Marín-Rubio, José Real. Equivalence of invariant measures and stationary statistical solutions for the autonomous globally modified Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 785-802. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.785
[4]	Grzegorz Łukaszewicz. Pullback attractors and statistical solutions for 2-D Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (3&4, May) : 643-659. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.643
[5]	Vittorino Pata. On the regularity of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (2) : 747-761. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.747
[6]	Hakima Bessaih, Benedetta Ferrario. Statistical properties of stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes equations from linear models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 2927-2947. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016080
[7]	Jingrui Wang, Keyan Wang. Almost sure existence of global weak solutions to the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (9) : 5003-5019. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017215
[8]	I. Moise, Roger Temam. Renormalization group method: Application to Navier-Stokes equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (1) : 191-210. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.191
[9]	Igor Kukavica, Mohammed Ziane. Regularity of the Navier-Stokes equation in a thin periodic domain with large data. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (1) : 67-86. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.67
[10]	Peter E. Kloeden, José Valero. The Kneser property of the weak solutions of the three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (1) : 161-179. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.161
[11]	Joanna Rencławowicz, Wojciech M. Zajączkowski. Global regular solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations with large flux. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1234-1243. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1234
[12]	Peter Anthony, Sergey Zelik. Infinite-energy solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations in a strip revisited. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (4) : 1361-1393. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1361
[13]	Peixin Zhang, Jianwen Zhang, Junning Zhao. On the global existence of classical solutions for compressible Navier-Stokes equations with vacuum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (2) : 1085-1103. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1085
[14]	Jochen Merker. Strong solutions of doubly nonlinear Navier-Stokes equations. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1052-1060. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1052
[15]	Reinhard Racke, Jürgen Saal. Hyperbolic Navier-Stokes equations II: Global existence of small solutions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2012, 1 (1) : 217-234. doi: 10.3934/eect.2012.1.217
[16]	Rafaela Guberović. Smoothness of Koch-Tataru solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations revisited. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (1) : 231-236. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.231
[17]	Yukang Chen, Changhua Wei. Partial regularity of solutions to the fractional Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (10) : 5309-5322. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016033
[18]	Zhilei Liang. Convergence rate of solutions to the contact discontinuity for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (5) : 1907-1926. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1907
[19]	Yejuan Wang, Tongtong Liang. Mild solutions to the time fractional Navier-Stokes delay differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3713-3740. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018312
[20]	Anne Bronzi, Ricardo Rosa. On the convergence of statistical solutions of the 3D Navier-Stokes-$\alpha$ model as $\alpha$ vanishes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (1) : 19-49. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.19

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences