American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  2006, 14(2): 329-342. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.329

Rigorous high-dimensional shadowing using containment: The general case

Wayne B. Hayes 1, , Kenneth R. Jackson 2, and  Carmen Young 3,

1. 

Dept. of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3425, United States
2. 

Computer Science Dept., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
3. 

The Fields Institute, 222 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3J1, Canada

Received  November 2004 Revised  June 2005 Published  November 2005

A shadow is an exact solution to an iterated map that remains close to an approximate solution for a long time. An elegant geometric method for proving the existence of shadows is called containment, and it has been proven previously in two and three dimensions, and in some special cases in higher dimensions. This paper presents the general proof using tools from differential and algebraic topology and singular homology.
Keywords: reliable simulation., Nonlinear dynamical systems, shadowing.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 57R19, 65G20; Secondary: 57R50, 65L7.
Citation: Wayne B. Hayes, Kenneth R. Jackson, Carmen Young. Rigorous high-dimensional shadowing using containment: The general case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (2) : 329-342. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.329
[1]

Lianfa He, Hongwen Zheng, Yujun Zhu. Shadowing in random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 12 (2) : 355-362. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.355
[2]

Noriaki Kawaguchi. Topological stability and shadowing of zero-dimensional dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (5) : 2743-2761. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019115
[3]

Gong Chen, Peter J. Olver. Numerical simulation of nonlinear dispersive quantization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (3) : 991-1008. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.991
[4]

Mahdi Khajeh Salehani. Identification of generic stable dynamical systems taking a nonlinear differential approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (10) : 4541-4555. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018175
[5]

Dušan M. Stipanović, Christopher Valicka, Claire J. Tomlin, Thomas R. Bewley. Safe and reliable coverage control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (1) : 31-48. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.31
[6]

Caixia Gao, Enmin Feng, Zongtao Wang, Zhilong Xiu. Nonlinear dynamical systems of bio-dissimilation of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol and their optimal controls. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (3) : 377-388. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.377
[7]

Masatoshi Shiino, Keiji Okumura. Control of attractors in nonlinear dynamical systems using external noise: Effects of noise on synchronization phenomena. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 685-694. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.685
[8]

El Houcein El Abdalaoui, Sylvain Bonnot, Ali Messaoudi, Olivier Sester. On the Fibonacci complex dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (5) : 2449-2471. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2449
[9]

Fritz Colonius, Marco Spadini. Fundamental semigroups for dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 447-463. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.447
[10]

John Erik Fornæss. Sustainable dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (6) : 1361-1386. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1361
[11]

Vieri Benci, C. Bonanno, Stefano Galatolo, G. Menconi, M. Virgilio. Dynamical systems and computable information. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 935-960. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.935
[12]

Josiney A. Souza, Tiago A. Pacifico, Hélio V. M. Tozatti. A note on parallelizable dynamical systems. Electronic Research Announcements, 2017, 24: 64-67. doi: 10.3934/era.2017.24.007
[13]

Mădălina Roxana Buneci. Morphisms of discrete dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (1) : 91-107. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.91
[14]

Philippe Marie, Jérôme Rousseau. Recurrence for random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 30 (1) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.1
[15]

Tobias Wichtrey. Harmonic limits of dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1432-1439. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1432
[16]

Jiakou Wang, Margaret J. Slattery, Meghan Henty Hoskins, Shile Liang, Cheng Dong, Qiang Du. Monte carlo simulation of heterotypic cell aggregation in nonlinear shear flow. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (4) : 683-696. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.683
[17]

Eleonora Messina. Numerical simulation of a SIS epidemic model based on a nonlinear Volterra integral equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 826-834. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0826
[18]

Kolade M. Owolabi, Edson Pindza. Numerical simulation of multidimensional nonlinear fractional Ginzburg-Landau equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 835-851. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020048
[19]

Walid K. Abou Salem, Xiao Liu, Catherine Sulem. Numerical simulation of resonant tunneling of fast solitons for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (4) : 1637-1649. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1637
[20]

Xiangrong Li, Vittorio Cristini, Qing Nie, John S. Lowengrub. Nonlinear three-dimensional simulation of solid tumor growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (3) : 581-604. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.581

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (32)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences