American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
November  2006, 15(4): 1017-1034. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1017

A rapidly converging phase field model

Xinfu Chen 1, , G. Caginalp 1, and  Christof Eck 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
2. 

Institute of Applied Mathematics, University Erlangen-Nurenberg 91058 Erlangen

Received  December 2004 Published  May 2006

We propose a phase field model that approximates its limiting sharp interface model (free boundary problem) up to second order in interface thickness. A broad range of double-well potentials can be utilized so long as the dynamical coefficient in the phase equation is adjusted appropriately. This model thereby assures that computation with particular value of interface thickness $\varepsilon$, will differ at most by $O(\varepsilon^2$) from the limiting sharp interface problem. As an illustration, the speed of a traveling wave of the phase field model is asymptotically expanded to demonstrate that it differs from the speed of the traveling wave of the limit problem by $O(\varepsilon^2)$.
Keywords: Phase field model, second order asymptotics., sharp interface limit.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 80A22, 80M35; Secondary: 35K5.
Citation: Xinfu Chen, G. Caginalp, Christof Eck. A rapidly converging phase field model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (4) : 1017-1034. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1017
[1]

Leonid Berlyand, Mykhailo Potomkin, Volodymyr Rybalko. Sharp interface limit in a phase field model of cell motility. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 551-590. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017023
[2]

G. Caginalp, Christof Eck. Rapidly converging phase field models via second order asymptotics. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 142-152. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.142
[3]

Antonio DeSimone, Martin Kružík. Domain patterns and hysteresis in phase-transforming solids: Analysis and numerical simulations of a sharp interface dissipative model via phase-field approximation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (2) : 481-499. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.481
[4]

Matthieu Alfaro, Arnaud Ducrot. Sharp interface limit of the Fisher-KPP equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 1-18. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1
[5]

Shi Jin, Min Tang, Houde Han. A uniformly second order numerical method for the one-dimensional discrete-ordinate transport equation and its diffusion limit with interface. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (1) : 35-65. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.35
[6]

Honghu Liu. Phase transitions of a phase field model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 883-894. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.883
[7]

Pierre-Étienne Druet. Some mathematical problems related to the second order optimal shape of a crystallisation interface. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (6) : 2443-2463. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2443
[8]

Takayuki Kubo, Yoshihiro Shibata, Kohei Soga. On some two phase problem for compressible and compressible viscous fluid flow separated by sharp interface. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (7) : 3741-3774. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.3741
[9]

Matthieu Alfaro, Arnaud Ducrot. Sharp interface limit of the Fisher-KPP equation when initial data have slow exponential decay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 15-29. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.15
[10]

G. Caginalp, Emre Esenturk. Anisotropic phase field equations of arbitrary order. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (2) : 311-350. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.311
[11]

Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Pavel Krejčí, Jürgen Sprekels. A vanishing diffusion limit in a nonstandard system of phase field equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (2) : 257-275. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.257
[12]

John M. Ball, Carlos Mora-Corral. A variational model allowing both smooth and sharp phase boundaries in solids. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (1) : 55-81. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.55
[13]

Michael Grinfeld, Amy Novick-Cohen. Some remarks on stability for a phase field model with memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (4) : 1089-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1089
[14]

A. Jiménez-Casas. Invariant regions and global existence for a phase field model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (2) : 273-281. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.273
[15]

Alberto Bressan, Marco Mazzola, Hongxu Wei. A dynamic model of the limit order book. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (11) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019206
[16]

Pedro Daniel Prieto-Martínez, Narciso Román-Roy. A new multisymplectic unified formalism for second order classical field theories. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (2) : 203-253. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.203
[17]

Sylvie Benzoni-Gavage, Laurent Chupin, Didier Jamet, Julien Vovelle. On a phase field model for solid-liquid phase transitions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (6) : 1997-2025. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1997
[18]

José Luiz Boldrini, Gabriela Planas. A tridimensional phase-field model with convection for phase change of an alloy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (2) : 429-450. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.429
[19]

Valeria Berti, Mauro Fabrizio, Diego Grandi. A phase field model for liquid-vapour phase transitions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (2) : 317-330. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.317
[20]

Roberto Triggiani. Sharp regularity theory of second order hyperbolic equations with Neumann boundary control non-smooth in space. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (4) : 489-514. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016016

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (9)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (7)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences