
Previous Article
Global attractor for a parabolichyperbolic PenroseFife phase field system
 DCDS Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Dynamics of shape memory alloys patches with mechanically induced transformations
Stability for steadystate patterns in phase field dynamics associated with total variation energies
1.  Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Kobe University, 11 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe, 6578501, Japan 
The first equation is a kind of heat equation, however a timerelaxation term is additionally inserted in the heat flux. Since the additional term guarantees some smoothness of the velocity of the heat diffusion, it is expected that the behavior of temperature is estimated in stronger topology than that as in the usual heat equation.
The second equation is a type of the socalled AllenCahn equation, namely it is a kinetic equation of phase field dynamics derived as a gradient flow of an appropriate functional. Such functional is often called as "free energy'', and in case of our model, the free energy is formulated with use of the total variation functional. Therefore, the second equation involves a singular diffusion, which formally corresponds to a function of (mean) curvature on the free boundary between solidliquid states (interface). It implies that this equation can be a modified expression of GibbsThomson law.
In this paper, we will focus on the geometry of the pattern drawn by solidliquid phases in steadystate (steadystate pattern), which will be expected to have some stability in dynamical system generated by our mathematical model. Consequently, various geometric patterns, parted by gradual curves, will be shown as representative examples of such steadystate patterns.
[1] 
Sylvie BenzoniGavage, Laurent Chupin, Didier Jamet, Julien Vovelle. On a phase field model for solidliquid phase transitions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2012, 32 (6) : 19972025. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1997 
[2] 
Theodore Kolokolnikov, Michael J. Ward, Juncheng Wei. The stability of steadystate hotspot patterns for a reactiondiffusion model of urban crime. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2014, 19 (5) : 13731410. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.1373 
[3] 
Meihua Wei, Jianhua Wu, Yinnian He. Steadystate solutions and stability for a cubic autocatalysis model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (3) : 11471167. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1147 
[4] 
Mauro Fabrizio, Claudio Giorgi, Angelo Morro. Isotropicnematic phase transitions in liquid crystals. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2011, 4 (3) : 565579. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.565 
[5] 
Federica Di Michele, Bruno Rubino, Rosella Sampalmieri. A steadystate mathematical model for an EOS capacitor: The effect of the size exclusion. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (4) : 603625. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016011 
[6] 
Shaoqiang Tang, Huijiang Zhao. Stability of Suliciu model for phase transitions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2004, 3 (4) : 545556. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2004.3.545 
[7] 
Valeria Berti, Mauro Fabrizio, Diego Grandi. A phase field model for liquidvapour phase transitions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2013, 6 (2) : 317330. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.317 
[8] 
Tomoyuki Miyaji, Yoshio Tsutsumi. Steadystate mode interactions of radially symmetric modes for the LugiatoLefever equation on a disk. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (4) : 16331650. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018078 
[9] 
WingCheong Lo. Morphogen gradient with expansionrepression mechanism: Steadystate and robustness studies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2014, 19 (3) : 775787. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.775 
[10] 
Yacine Chitour, JeanMichel Coron, Mauro Garavello. On conditions that prevent steadystate controllability of certain linear partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2006, 14 (4) : 643672. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.643 
[11] 
Zhenzhen Zheng, ChingShan Chou, TauMu Yi, Qing Nie. Mathematical analysis of steadystate solutions in compartment and continuum models of cell polarization. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (4) : 11351168. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1135 
[12] 
Takeshi Ohtsuka, Ken Shirakawa, Noriaki Yamazaki. Optimal control problem for AllenCahn type equation associated with total variation energy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2012, 5 (1) : 159181. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.159 
[13] 
Jiayan Yang, Dongpei Zhang. Superfluidity phase transitions for liquid $ ^{4} $He system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2017, 22 (11) : 114. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019045 
[14] 
HsinYi Liu, Hsing Paul Luh. Kronecker productforms of steadystate probabilities with $C_k$/$C_m$/$1$ by matrix polynomial approaches. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (4) : 691711. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.691 
[15] 
ShinYi Lee, ShinHwa Wang, ChiouPing Ye. Explicit necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a dead core solution of a plaplacian steadystate reactiondiffusion problem. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 587596. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.587 
[16] 
Na Min, Mingxin Wang. Hopf bifurcation and steadystate bifurcation for a LeslieGower preypredator model with strong Allee effect in prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2019, 39 (2) : 10711099. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019045 
[17] 
Rebecca McKay, Theodore Kolokolnikov. Stability transitions and dynamics of mesa patterns near the shadow limit of reactiondiffusion systems in one space dimension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2012, 17 (1) : 191220. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.191 
[18] 
ShuYi Zhang. Existence of multidimensional nonisothermal phase transitions in a steady van der Waals flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2013, 33 (5) : 22212239. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2221 
[19] 
Xiaoqun Zhang, Tony F. Chan. Wavelet inpainting by nonlocal total variation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2010, 4 (1) : 191210. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2010.4.191 
[20] 
Honghu Liu. Phase transitions of a phase field model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2011, 16 (3) : 883894. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.883 
2018 Impact Factor: 1.143
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]