Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations

Previous Article
Pullback and forward attractors for a 3D LANS$-\alpha$ model with delay
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Global exact shock reconstruction for quasilinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws

May 2006, 15(2): 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579

Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations

Bernd Aulbach ^1, , Martin Rasmussen ^1, and Stefan Siegmund ^2,

1.	Department of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, D-86135 Augsburg
2.	Department of Mathematics, University of Frankfurt, D-60325 Frankfurt

Received December 2004 Revised October 2005 Published March 2006

Abstract
Related Papers

We discuss the relationship between invariant manifolds of nonautonomous differential equations and pullback attractors. This relationship is essential, e.g., for the numerical approximation of these manifolds. In the first step, we show that the unstable manifold is the pullback attractor of the differential equation. The main result says that every (hyperbolic or nonhyperbolic) invariant manifold is the pullback attractor of a related system which we construct explicitly using spectral transformations. To illustrate our theorem, we present an application to the Lorenz system and approximate numerically the stable as well as the strong stable manifold of the origin.

Keywords: invariant manifold, pullback attractor, numerical approximation., Nonautonomous differential equation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 34C30, 34D45, 37B55, 37D10, 65L2.

Citation: Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579

[1]	Arne Ogrowsky, Björn Schmalfuss. Unstable invariant manifolds for a nonautonomous differential equation with nonautonomous unbounded delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (6) : 1663-1681. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1663
[2]	Zeqi Zhu, Caidi Zhao. Pullback attractor and invariant measures for the three-dimensional regularized MHD equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (3) : 1461-1477. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018060
[3]	Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133-140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133
[4]	T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa, J. Valero. Structure of the pullback attractor for a non-autonomous scalar differential inclusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (4) : 979-994. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016037
[5]	Linfang Liu, Xianlong Fu, Yuncheng You. Pullback attractor in $H^{1}$ for nonautonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on $\mathbb{R}^n$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (10) : 3629-3651. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017143
[6]	Yangrong Li, Lianbing She, Jinyan Yin. Longtime robustness and semi-uniform compactness of a pullback attractor via nonautonomous PDE. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (4) : 1535-1557. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018058
[7]	Yejuan Wang, Chengkui Zhong, Shengfan Zhou. Pullback attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (3) : 587-614. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.587
[8]	Wan-Tong Li, Bin-Guo Wang. Attractor minimal sets for nonautonomous type-K competitive and semi-convex delay differential equations with applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 24 (2) : 589-611. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.589
[9]	Yanzhao Cao, Anping Liu, Zhimin Zhang. Special section on differential equations: Theory, application, and numerical approximation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (5) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.5i
[10]	Wen Tan. The regularity of pullback attractor for a non-autonomous p-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 529-546. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018194
[11]	Yanfeng Guo, Jinqiao Duan, Donglong Li. Approximation of random invariant manifolds for a stochastic Swift-Hohenberg equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (6) : 1701-1715. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016071
[12]	Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Approximation of attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (2) : 215-238. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.215
[13]	George Osipenko. Linearization near a locally nonunique invariant manifold. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1997, 3 (2) : 189-205. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.189
[14]	Ariadna Farrés, Àngel Jorba. On the high order approximation of the centre manifold for ODEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (3) : 977-1000. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.977
[15]	Giuseppe Da Prato. An integral inequality for the invariant measure of some finite dimensional stochastic differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 3015-3027. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016085
[16]	Marx Chhay, Aziz Hamdouni. On the accuracy of invariant numerical schemes. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (2) : 761-783. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.761
[17]	Saugata Bandyopadhyay, Bernard Dacorogna, Olivier Kneuss. The Pullback equation for degenerate forms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (2) : 657-691. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.657
[18]	Shihchung Chiang. Numerical optimal unbounded control with a singular integro-differential equation as a constraint. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 129-137. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.129
[19]	Roberto Camassa, Pao-Hsiung Chiu, Long Lee, W.-H. Sheu. A particle method and numerical study of a quasilinear partial differential equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (5) : 1503-1515. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1503
[20]	Rua Murray. Approximation error for invariant density calculations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (3) : 535-557. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.535

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences