Hyperbolic invariant sets with positive measures

Previous Article
Existence, uniqueness of weak solutions and global attractors for a class of nonlinear 2D Kirchhoff-Boussinesq models
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Global stability of traveling curved fronts in the Allen-Cahn equations

August 2006, 15(3): 811-818. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.811

Hyperbolic invariant sets with positive measures

1.	Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

Received July 2005 Revised January 2006 Published April 2006

Abstract
Related Papers

In this short paper we prove some results concerning volume-preserving Anosov diffeomorphisms on compact manifolds. The first theorem is that if a $C^{1 + \alpha}$, $\alpha >0$, volume-preserving diffeomorphism on a compact connected manifold has a hyperbolic invariant set with positive volume, then the map is Anosov. The same result had been obtained by Bochi and Viana [2]. This result is not necessarily true for $C^1$ maps. The proof uses a Pugh-Shub type of dynamically defined measure density points, which are different from the standard Lebesgue density points. We then give a direct proof of the ergodicity of $C^{1+\alpha}$ volume preserving Anosov diffeomorphisms, without using the usual Hopf arguments or the Birkhoff ergodic theorem. The method we introduced also has interesting applications to partially hyperbolic and non-uniformly hyperbolic systems.

Keywords: Ergodic theory, hyperbolic invariant set., volume-preserving diffeomorphisms, Anosov map.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 37A25, 37D05, 37D2.

Citation: Zhihong Xia. Hyperbolic invariant sets with positive measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (3) : 811-818. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.811

[1]	Vadim Kaloshin, Maria Saprykina. Generic 3-dimensional volume-preserving diffeomorphisms with superexponential growth of number of periodic orbits. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 611-640. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.611
[2]	H. E. Lomelí, J. D. Meiss. Generating forms for exact volume-preserving maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (2) : 361-377. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.361
[3]	Fuzhong Cong, Hongtian Li. Quasi-effective stability for a nearly integrable volume-preserving mapping. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (7) : 1959-1970. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1959
[4]	Huyi Hu, Miaohua Jiang, Yunping Jiang. Infimum of the metric entropy of volume preserving Anosov systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (9) : 4767-4783. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017205
[5]	Rhudaina Z. Mohammad, Karel Švadlenka. Multiphase volume-preserving interface motions via localized signed distance vector scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (5) : 969-988. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.969
[6]	João P. Almeida, Albert M. Fisher, Alberto Adrego Pinto, David A. Rand. Anosov diffeomorphisms. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 837-845. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.837
[7]	Rafael de la Llave, Jason D. Mireles James. Parameterization of invariant manifolds by reducibility for volume preserving and symplectic maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (12) : 4321-4360. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4321
[8]	Radu Saghin. Volume growth and entropy for $C^1$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (9) : 3789-3801. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.3789
[9]	Artem Dudko. Computability of the Julia set. Nonrecurrent critical orbits. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (7) : 2751-2778. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.2751
[10]	Amadeu Delshams, Marian Gidea, Pablo Roldán. Transition map and shadowing lemma for normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (3) : 1089-1112. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1089
[11]	Huiyan Xue, Antonella Zanna. Generating functions and volume preserving mappings. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (3) : 1229-1249. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1229
[12]	Ryszard Rudnicki. An ergodic theory approach to chaos. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (2) : 757-770. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.757
[13]	Thierry de la Rue. An introduction to joinings in ergodic theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (1) : 121-142. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.121
[14]	Maria Carvalho. First homoclinic tangencies in the boundary of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (4) : 765-782. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.765
[15]	Christian Bonatti, Nancy Guelman. Axiom A diffeomorphisms derived from Anosov flows. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (1) : 1-63. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.1
[16]	Matthieu Porte. Linear response for Dirac observables of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (4) : 1799-1819. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019078
[17]	François Ledrappier, Seonhee Lim. Volume entropy of hyperbolic buildings. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (1) : 139-165. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.139
[18]	James W. Cannon, Mark H. Meilstrup, Andreas Zastrow. The period set of a map from the Cantor set to itself. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (7) : 2667-2679. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2667
[19]	Luis Barreira, Christian Wolf. Dimension and ergodic decompositions for hyperbolic flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 17 (1) : 201-212. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.201
[20]	Patrick Foulon, Boris Hasselblatt. Lipschitz continuous invariant forms for algebraic Anosov systems. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (3) : 571-584. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.571

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences