# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

December  2007, 19(4): 799-811. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.799

## Rates of convergence towards the boundary of a self-similar set

 1 Department of Mathematics, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, United Kingdom

Received  October 2006 Revised  April 2007 Published  September 2007

The geometry of self-similar sets $K$ has been studied intensively during the past 20 years frequently assuming the so-called Open Set Condition (OSC). The OSC guarantees the existence of an open set $U$ satisfying various natural invariance properties, and is instrumental in the study of self-similar sets for the following reason: a careful analysis of the boundaries of the iterates of $\overline U$ is the key technique for obtaining information about the geometry of $K$. In order to obtain a better understanding of the OSC and because of the geometric significance of the boundaries of the iterates of $\overline U$, it is clearly of interest to provide quantitative estimates for the "number" of points close to the boundaries of the iterates of $\overline U$. This motivates a detailed study of the rate at which the distance between a point in $K$ and the boundaries of the iterates of $\overline U$ converge to $0$. In this paper we show that for each $t\in I$ (where $I$ is a certain interval defined below) there is a significant number of points for which the rate of convergence equals $t$. In fact, for each $t\in I$, we show that the set of points whose rate of convergence equals $t$ has positive Hausdorff dimension, and we obtain a lower bound for this dimension. Examples show that this bound is, in general, the best possible and cannot be improved.
Citation: L. Olsen. Rates of convergence towards the boundary of a self-similar set. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 19 (4) : 799-811. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.799
 [1] Krzysztof Barański. Hausdorff dimension of self-affine limit sets with an invariant direction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 21 (4) : 1015-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.1015 [2] Weronika Biedrzycka, Marta Tyran-Kamińska. Self-similar solutions of fragmentation equations revisited. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 13-27. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018002 [3] Marco Cannone, Grzegorz Karch. On self-similar solutions to the homogeneous Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2013, 6 (4) : 801-808. doi: 10.3934/krm.2013.6.801 [4] Rostislav Grigorchuk, Volodymyr Nekrashevych. Self-similar groups, operator algebras and Schur complement. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (3) : 323-370. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.323 [5] Christoph Bandt, Helena PeÑa. Polynomial approximation of self-similar measures and the spectrum of the transfer operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (9) : 4611-4623. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017198 [6] Anna Chiara Lai, Paola Loreti. Self-similar control systems and applications to zygodactyl bird's foot. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (2) : 401-419. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.401 [7] Kin Ming Hui. Existence of self-similar solutions of the inverse mean curvature flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (2) : 863-880. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019036 [8] D. G. Aronson. Self-similar focusing in porous media: An explicit calculation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 1685-1691. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1685 [9] G. A. Braga, Frederico Furtado, Vincenzo Isaia. Renormalization group calculation of asymptotically self-similar dynamics. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 131-141. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.131 [10] Qiaolin He. Numerical simulation and self-similar analysis of singular solutions of Prandtl equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (1) : 101-116. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.101 [11] Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Singular backward self-similar solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (4) : 897-906. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.897 [12] Bendong Lou. Self-similar solutions in a sector for a quasilinear parabolic equation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 857-879. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.857 [13] F. Berezovskaya, G. Karev. Bifurcations of self-similar solutions of the Fokker-Plank equations. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 91-99. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.91 [14] Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. A posteriori error estimates for self-similar solutions to the Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020168 [15] Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Forward self-similar solution with a moving singularity for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (1) : 313-331. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.313 [16] Marek Fila, Michael Winkler, Eiji Yanagida. Convergence to self-similar solutions for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 21 (3) : 703-716. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.703 [17] Hyungjin Huh. Self-similar solutions to nonlinear Dirac equations and an application to nonuniqueness. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (1) : 53-60. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018003 [18] Luis Barreira and Jorg Schmeling. Invariant sets with zero measure and full Hausdorff dimension. Electronic Research Announcements, 1997, 3: 114-118. [19] Krzysztof Barański, Michał Wardal. On the Hausdorff dimension of the Sierpiński Julia sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (8) : 3293-3313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3293 [20] Manuel Fernández-Martínez, Miguel Ángel López Guerrero. Generating pre-fractals to approach real IFS-attractors with a fixed Hausdorff dimension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1129-1137. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1129

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338