Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey

Previous Article
Weak shock solution in supersonic flow past a wedge
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Levelsets and anisotropic mesh adaptation

January & February 2009, 23(1&2): 133-164. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.133

Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey

Philippe G. Ciarlet ^1, , Liliana Gratie ^2, and Cristinel Mardare ^3,

1.	Department of Mathematics, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
2.	Liu Bie Ju Centre for Mathematical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
3.	Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions & Centre National de la Recherche Scientique, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France

Received October 2007 Published September 2008

Abstract
Related Papers

In the classical approach to elasticity problems, the components of the displacement field are the primary unknowns. In an "intrinsic'' approach, new unknowns with more physical or geometrical meanings, such as a strain tensor field or a rotation field for instance, are instead taken as the primary unknowns. We survey here recent progress about the mathematical analysis of such methods applied to linear and nonlinear three-dimensional elasticity and shell problems.

Keywords: Linearized and nonlinear three-dimensional elasticity, linear and nonlinear shell theory, intrinsic methods in elasticity.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 74-02; Secondary: 74G25, 74G65, 74K25.

Citation: Philippe G. Ciarlet, Liliana Gratie, Cristinel Mardare. Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 133-164. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.133

[1]	Irena PawŃow, Wojciech M. Zajączkowski. Global regular solutions to three-dimensional thermo-visco-elasticity with nonlinear temperature-dependent specific heat. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (4) : 1331-1372. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017065
[2]	Nicolas Van Goethem. The Frank tensor as a boundary condition in intrinsic linearized elasticity. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (4) : 391-411. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016013
[3]	Biswajit Basu. On an exact solution of a nonlinear three-dimensional model in ocean flows with equatorial undercurrent and linear variation in density. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (8) : 4783-4796. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019195
[4]	Youri V. Egorov, Evariste Sanchez-Palencia. Remarks on certain singular perturbations with ill-posed limit in shell theory and elasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1293-1305. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1293
[5]	Julian Braun, Bernd Schmidt. On the passage from atomistic systems to nonlinear elasticity theory for general multi-body potentials with p-growth. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (4) : 879-912. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.879
[6]	Annie Raoult. Symmetry groups in nonlinear elasticity: an exercise in vintage mathematics. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (1) : 435-456. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.435
[7]	Irena Lasiecka, W. Heyman. Asymptotic behavior of solutions in nonlinear dynamic elasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1995, 1 (2) : 237-252. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.237
[8]	Xiangrong Li, Vittorio Cristini, Qing Nie, John S. Lowengrub. Nonlinear three-dimensional simulation of solid tumor growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (3) : 581-604. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.581
[9]	Teng Wang, Yi Wang. Nonlinear stability of planar rarefaction wave to the three-dimensional Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (3) : 637-679. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019025
[10]	Lorena Bociu, Steven Derochers, Daniel Toundykov. Linearized hydro-elasticity: A numerical study. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (4) : 533-559. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016018
[11]	Lorena Bociu, Jean-Paul Zolésio. Existence for the linearization of a steady state fluid/nonlinear elasticity interaction. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 184-197. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.184
[12]	Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi, Michel Fortin. Reduced symmetry elements in linear elasticity. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (1) : 95-121. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.95
[13]	Magdalena Nockowska-Rosiak, Piotr Hachuła, Ewa Schmeidel. Existence of uncountably many asymptotically constant solutions to discrete nonlinear three-dimensional system with $p$-Laplacian. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 369-375. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018025
[14]	Bernd Schmidt. On the derivation of linear elasticity from atomistic models. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (4) : 789-812. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.789
[15]	Victoriano Carmona, Emilio Freire, Soledad Fernández-García. Periodic orbits and invariant cones in three-dimensional piecewise linear systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (1) : 59-72. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.59
[16]	Shalela Mohd--Mahali, Song Wang, Xia Lou, Sungging Pintowantoro. Numerical methods for estimating effective diffusion coefficients of three-dimensional drug delivery systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (2) : 377-393. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.377
[17]	Baowei Feng. On the decay rates for a one-dimensional porous elasticity system with past history. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 2905-2921. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019130
[18]	Mark S. Gockenbach, Akhtar A. Khan. Identification of Lamé parameters in linear elasticity: a fixed point approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (4) : 487-497. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.487
[19]	Zhangxin Chen, Qiaoyuan Jiang, Yanli Cui. Locking-free nonconforming finite elements for planar linear elasticity. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 181-189. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.181
[20]	Mário Bessa, Jorge Rocha. Three-dimensional conservative star flows are Anosov. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (3) : 839-846. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.839

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences