American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

August  2012, 32(8): 2971-2995. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2971

Stochastic phase dynamics of noise driven synchronization of two conditional coherent oscillators

 1 Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z2, Canada, Canada 2 Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2

Received  April 2011 Revised  September 2011 Published  March 2012

We consider a pair of uncoupled conditional oscillators near a subcritical Hopf bifurcation that are driven by two weak white noise sources, one intrinsic and one common. In this context the noise drives oscillations in a setting where the underlying deterministic dynamics are quiescent. Synchronization of these noise-driven oscillations is considered, where the noise is also driving synchronization. We first derive the envelope equations of the noise-driven oscillations using a stochastic multiple scales method, providing access to phase and amplitude information. Using both a linearized approximation and an asymptotic analysis of the nonlinear system, we obtain approximations for the probability density of the phase difference of the oscillators. It is found that common noise increases the degree of synchrony in the pair of oscillators, which can be characterized by the ratio of intrinsic to common noise. Asymptotic expressions for the phase difference density provide explicit parametric expressions for the probability of observing different phase dynamics: in-phase synchronization, phase shifted oscillations, and non-synchronized states. Computational results are provided to support analytical conclusions.
Citation: William F. Thompson, Rachel Kuske, Yue-Xian Li. Stochastic phase dynamics of noise driven synchronization of two conditional coherent oscillators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (8) : 2971-2995. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2971
References:

show all references

References:
 [1] Sylvain De Moor, Luis Miguel Rodrigues, Julien Vovelle. Invariant measures for a stochastic Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 357-395. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018017 [2] Michael Herty, Christian Jörres, Albert N. Sandjo. Optimization of a model Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 485-503. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.485 [3] Marco Torregrossa, Giuseppe Toscani. On a Fokker-Planck equation for wealth distribution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018016 [4] José Antonio Alcántara, Simone Calogero. On a relativistic Fokker-Planck equation in kinetic theory. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 401-426. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.401 [5] Helge Dietert, Josephine Evans, Thomas Holding. Contraction in the Wasserstein metric for the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation on the torus. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1427-1441. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018056 [6] Andreas Denner, Oliver Junge, Daniel Matthes. Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008 [7] Ioannis Markou. Hydrodynamic limit for a Fokker-Planck equation with coefficients in Sobolev spaces. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 683-705. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017028 [8] Giuseppe Toscani. A Rosenau-type approach to the approximation of the linear Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 697-714. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018028 [9] Shui-Nee Chow, Wuchen Li, Haomin Zhou. Entropy dissipation of Fokker-Planck equations on graphs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (10) : 4929-4950. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018215 [10] Michael Herty, Lorenzo Pareschi. Fokker-Planck asymptotics for traffic flow models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 165-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.165 [11] Ludovic Dan Lemle. $L^1(R^d,dx)$-uniqueness of weak solutions for the Fokker-Planck equation associated with a class of Dirichlet operators. Electronic Research Announcements, 2008, 15: 65-70. doi: 10.3934/era.2008.15.65 [12] Joseph G. Conlon, André Schlichting. A non-local problem for the Fokker-Planck equation related to the Becker-Döring model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (4) : 1821-1889. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019079 [13] Simon Plazotta. A BDF2-approach for the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (5) : 2893-2913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019120 [14] Patrick Cattiaux, Elissar Nasreddine, Marjolaine Puel. Diffusion limit for kinetic Fokker-Planck equation with heavy tails equilibria: The critical case. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (4) : 727-748. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019028 [15] Florian Schneider, Andreas Roth, Jochen Kall. First-order quarter-and mixed-moment realizability theory and Kershaw closures for a Fokker-Planck equation in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (4) : 1127-1161. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017044 [16] Roberta Bosi. Classical limit for linear and nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 845-870. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.845 [17] John W. Barrett, Endre Süli. Existence of global weak solutions to Fokker-Planck and Navier-Stokes-Fokker-Planck equations in kinetic models of dilute polymers. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2010, 3 (3) : 371-408. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.371 [18] Kim-Ngan Le, William McLean, Martin Stynes. Existence, uniqueness and regularity of the solution of the time-fractional Fokker–Planck equation with general forcing. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2765-2787. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019124 [19] Linghua Chen, Espen R. Jakobsen. L1 semigroup generation for Fokker-Planck operators associated to general Lévy driven SDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (11) : 5735-5763. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018250 [20] Luis Almeida, Federica Bubba, Benoît Perthame, Camille Pouchol. Energy and implicit discretization of the Fokker-Planck and Keller-Segel type equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (1) : 23-41. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019002

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143