April  2013, 33(4): 1375-1388. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1375

Observable optimal state points of subadditive potentials

1. 

Instituto de Matemática y Estadística Rafael Laguardia, Universidad de la República, Av. Herrera y Reissig 565, C.P.11300, Montevideo, Uruguay

2. 

Department of Mathematics, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu

Received  October 2011 Revised  June 2012 Published  October 2012

For a sequence of subadditive potentials, a method of choosing state points with negative growth rates for an ergodic dynamical system was given in [5]. This paper first generalizes this result to the non-ergodic dynamics, and then proves that under some mild additional hypothesis, one can choose points with negative growth rates from a positive Lebesgue measure set, even if the system does not preserve any measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure.
Citation: Eleonora Catsigeras, Yun Zhao. Observable optimal state points of subadditive potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (4) : 1375-1388. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1375
References:
[1]

Y. Cao, On growth rates of sub-additive functions for semi-flows: determined and random cases,, J. Diff. Eqns, 231 (2006), 1.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.08.016.  Google Scholar

[2]

E. Catsigeras and H. Enrich, SRB-like measures for $C^0$ dynamics,, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math., 59 (2011), 151.  doi: 10.4064/ba59-2-5.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Catsigeras, Milnor-like attractors,, preprint, ().   Google Scholar

[4]

X. Dai, Y. Huang and M. Xiao, Periodically switched stability induces exponential stability of discrete-time linear switched systems in the sense of Markovian probabilities,, Automatica, 47 (2011), 1512.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.034.  Google Scholar

[5]

X. Dai, Optimal state points of the subadditive ergodic theorem,, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 1565.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/24/5/009.  Google Scholar

[6]

T. Golenishcheva-Kutuzova and V. Kleptsyn, Convergence of the Krylov-Bogolyubov procedure in Bowan's example,, (Russian) Mat. Zametki, 82 (2007), 678.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, "An Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications,", volume 54, (1995).   Google Scholar

[8]

J. F. C. Kingman, Subadditive ergodic theory,, Ann. Probab., 1 (1973), 883.   Google Scholar

[9]

M. Misiurewicz, Ergodic natural measures,, in, (2005), 1.   Google Scholar

[10]

S. J. Schreiber, On growth rates of subadditive functions for semi-flows,, J. Diff. Eqns, 148 (1998), 334.  doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3471.  Google Scholar

[11]

K. Sigmund, Generic properties of invariant measures for axiom A-diffeomorphisms,, Inventiones Math., 11 (1970), 99.  doi: 10.1007/BF01404606.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. Sigmund, On the distribution of periodic points for $\beta-$shifts,, Monatsh. Math, 82 (1976), 247.  doi: 10.1007/BF01526329.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. Sturman, and J. Stark, Semi-uniform ergodic theorems and applications to forced systems,, Nonlinearity, 13 (2000), 113.   Google Scholar

[14]

Y. Takahashi, Entropy Functional (free energy) for Dynamical Systems and their Random Perturbations,, in, 32 (1982), 437.   Google Scholar

[15]

F. Takens, Heteroclinic attractors: time averages and moduli of topological conjugacy,, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Math., 25 (1994), 107.  doi: 10.1007/BF01232938.  Google Scholar

[16]

P. Walters, "An Introduction to Ergodic Theory,", GTM 79, (1982).   Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

Y. Cao, On growth rates of sub-additive functions for semi-flows: determined and random cases,, J. Diff. Eqns, 231 (2006), 1.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.08.016.  Google Scholar

[2]

E. Catsigeras and H. Enrich, SRB-like measures for $C^0$ dynamics,, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math., 59 (2011), 151.  doi: 10.4064/ba59-2-5.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Catsigeras, Milnor-like attractors,, preprint, ().   Google Scholar

[4]

X. Dai, Y. Huang and M. Xiao, Periodically switched stability induces exponential stability of discrete-time linear switched systems in the sense of Markovian probabilities,, Automatica, 47 (2011), 1512.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.034.  Google Scholar

[5]

X. Dai, Optimal state points of the subadditive ergodic theorem,, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 1565.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/24/5/009.  Google Scholar

[6]

T. Golenishcheva-Kutuzova and V. Kleptsyn, Convergence of the Krylov-Bogolyubov procedure in Bowan's example,, (Russian) Mat. Zametki, 82 (2007), 678.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, "An Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications,", volume 54, (1995).   Google Scholar

[8]

J. F. C. Kingman, Subadditive ergodic theory,, Ann. Probab., 1 (1973), 883.   Google Scholar

[9]

M. Misiurewicz, Ergodic natural measures,, in, (2005), 1.   Google Scholar

[10]

S. J. Schreiber, On growth rates of subadditive functions for semi-flows,, J. Diff. Eqns, 148 (1998), 334.  doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3471.  Google Scholar

[11]

K. Sigmund, Generic properties of invariant measures for axiom A-diffeomorphisms,, Inventiones Math., 11 (1970), 99.  doi: 10.1007/BF01404606.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. Sigmund, On the distribution of periodic points for $\beta-$shifts,, Monatsh. Math, 82 (1976), 247.  doi: 10.1007/BF01526329.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. Sturman, and J. Stark, Semi-uniform ergodic theorems and applications to forced systems,, Nonlinearity, 13 (2000), 113.   Google Scholar

[14]

Y. Takahashi, Entropy Functional (free energy) for Dynamical Systems and their Random Perturbations,, in, 32 (1982), 437.   Google Scholar

[15]

F. Takens, Heteroclinic attractors: time averages and moduli of topological conjugacy,, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Math., 25 (1994), 107.  doi: 10.1007/BF01232938.  Google Scholar

[16]

P. Walters, "An Introduction to Ergodic Theory,", GTM 79, (1982).   Google Scholar

[1]

Veena Goswami, Gopinath Panda. Optimal customer behavior in observable and unobservable discrete-time queues. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019112

[2]

Leandro Cioletti, Artur O. Lopes, Manuel Stadlbauer. Ruelle operator for continuous potentials and DLR-Gibbs measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (8) : 4625-4652. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020195

[3]

Akhtam Dzhalilov, Isabelle Liousse, Dieter Mayer. Singular measures of piecewise smooth circle homeomorphisms with two break points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 24 (2) : 381-403. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.381

[4]

Youngna Choi. Attractors from one dimensional Lorenz-like maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2004, 11 (2&3) : 715-730. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.715

[5]

Vanderlei Horita, Nivaldo Muniz. Basin problem for Hénon-like attractors in arbitrary dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (2) : 481-504. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.481

[6]

Norihisa Ikoma. Existence of ground state solutions to the nonlinear Kirchhoff type equations with potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (3) : 943-966. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.943

[7]

Evelyn Herberg, Michael Hinze, Henrik Schumacher. Maximal discrete sparsity in parabolic optimal control with measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020018

[8]

Rostyslav Kravchenko. The action of finite-state tree automorphisms on Bernoulli measures. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (3) : 443-451. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.443

[9]

Peidong Liu, Kening Lu. A note on partially hyperbolic attractors: Entropy conjecture and SRB measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (1) : 341-352. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.341

[10]

Zeng Lian, Peidong Liu, Kening Lu. Existence of SRB measures for a class of partially hyperbolic attractors in banach spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (7) : 3905-3920. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017164

[11]

Jian-Jun Xu, Junichiro Shimizu. Asymptotic theory for disc-like crystal growth (I) --- Basic state solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 1091-1116. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.1091

[12]

Xuewei Ju, Desheng Li, Jinqiao Duan. Forward attraction of pullback attractors and synchronizing behavior of gradient-like systems with nonautonomous perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1175-1197. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019011

[13]

Donald Ornstein, Benjamin Weiss. Entropy is the only finitely observable invariant. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (1) : 93-105. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.93

[14]

Cristiana J. Silva, Helmut Maurer, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control of a Tuberculosis model with state and control delays. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 321-337. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017021

[15]

Jérome Lohéac, Jean-François Scheid. Time optimal control for a nonholonomic system with state constraint. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (2) : 185-208. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.185

[16]

Kazimierz Malanowski, Helmut Maurer. Sensitivity analysis for state constrained optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (2) : 241-272. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.241

[17]

Giulia Cavagnari. Regularity results for a time-optimal control problem in the space of probability measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (2) : 213-233. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017007

[18]

Chao Ji. Ground state solutions of fractional Schrödinger equations with potentials and weak monotonicity condition on the nonlinear term. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (11) : 6071-6089. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019131

[19]

Renata Bunoiu, Radu Precup, Csaba Varga. Multiple positive standing wave solutions for schrödinger equations with oscillating state-dependent potentials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (3) : 953-972. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017046

[20]

Marcos L. M. Carvalho, Edcarlos D. Silva, Claudiney Goulart, Carlos A. Santos. Ground and bound state solutions for quasilinear elliptic systems including singular nonlinearities and indefinite potentials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (9) : 4401-4432. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020201

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (36)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]