American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2015, 35(6): 2659-2677. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2659

A posteriori error estimates for time-dependent reaction-diffusion problems based on the Payne--Weinberger inequality

Svetlana Matculevich 1, , Pekka Neittaanmäki 2, and  Sergey Repin 2,

1. 

Dept. of Mathematical Information Technology, Faculty of Information Technology, C321.4, Agora, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
2. 

Dept. of Mathematical Information Technology, Faculty of Information Technology, Agora, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, Finland

Received  January 2014 Revised  April 2014 Published  December 2014

We consider evolutionary reaction-diffusion problems with mixed Dirichlet--Robin boundary conditions. For this class of problems, we derive two-sided estimates of the distance between any function in the admissible energy space and the exact solution of the problem. The estimates (majorants and minorants) are explicitly computable and do not contain unknown functions or constants. Moreover, it is proved that the estimates are equivalent to the energy norm of the deviation from the exact solution.
Keywords: a posteriori estimates, Parabolic equations, Poincaré type estimates..
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35K20, 65M15, 65N3.
Citation: Svetlana Matculevich, Pekka Neittaanmäki, Sergey Repin. A posteriori error estimates for time-dependent reaction-diffusion problems based on the Payne--Weinberger inequality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (6) : 2659-2677. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2659
References:
[1]

G. Acosta and R. G. Durán, An optimal Poincaré inequality in $L^1$ for convex domains,, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 132 (2004), 195.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07004-7.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Bebendorf, A note on the Poincaré inequality for convex domains,, Z. Anal. Anwendungen, 22 (2003), 751.  doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1170.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations,, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, (2010).   Google Scholar

[4]

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics,, in Applied Mathematical Sciences (eds. E.H. Zarantonello and Author 2), (1985).  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4317-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, V. A. Solonnikov and N. N. Uraltseva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type,, Nauka, (1967).   Google Scholar

[6]

R. S. Laugesen and B. A. Siudeja, Minimizing Neumann fundamental tones of triangles: an optimal Poincaré inequality,, J. Differential Equations, 249 (2010), 118.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2010.02.020.  Google Scholar

[7]

O. Mali and P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Accuracy Verification Methods. Theory and Algorithms, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, 32,, Springer, (2014).  doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7581-7.  Google Scholar

[8]

S. Matculevich and S. Repin, Computable estimates of the distance to the exact solution of the evolutionary reaction-diffusion equation,, Appl. Math. Comput., 247 (2014), 329.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.055.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Reliable methods for computer simulation, error control and a posteriori estimates,, in Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, (2004).   Google Scholar

[10]

P. Neittaanmäki and P. S. Repin, A posteriori error majorants for approximations of the evolutionary Stokes problem,, J. Numer. Math., 18 (2010), 119.  doi: 10.1515/JNUM.2010.005.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Guaranteed error bounds for conforming approximations of a Maxwell type problem,, in Comput. Methods Appl. Sci., (2010), 199.  doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3239-3_15.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. E. Payne and H. F. Weinberger, An optimal Poincaré inequality for convex domains,, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 5 (1960), 286.  doi: 10.1007/BF00252910.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. I. Repin, Estimates of deviations from exact solutions of initial-boundary value problem for the heat equation,, Rend. Mat. Acc. Lincei, 13 (2002), 121.   Google Scholar

[14]

S. Repin, A posteriori estimates for partial differential equations,, in Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, (2008).  doi: 10.1515/9783110203042.  Google Scholar

[15]

S. Repin and S. Sauter, Functional a posteriori estimates for the reaction-diffusion problem,, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 343 (2006), 349.  doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2006.06.024.  Google Scholar

[16]

S. Repin and S. K. Tomar, A posteriori error estimates for approximations of evolutionary convection-diffusion problems,, J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 170 (2010), 554.  doi: 10.1007/s10958-010-0100-1.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

G. Acosta and R. G. Durán, An optimal Poincaré inequality in $L^1$ for convex domains,, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 132 (2004), 195.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07004-7.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Bebendorf, A note on the Poincaré inequality for convex domains,, Z. Anal. Anwendungen, 22 (2003), 751.  doi: 10.4171/ZAA/1170.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations,, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, (2010).   Google Scholar

[4]

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics,, in Applied Mathematical Sciences (eds. E.H. Zarantonello and Author 2), (1985).  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4317-3.  Google Scholar

[5]

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, V. A. Solonnikov and N. N. Uraltseva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type,, Nauka, (1967).   Google Scholar

[6]

R. S. Laugesen and B. A. Siudeja, Minimizing Neumann fundamental tones of triangles: an optimal Poincaré inequality,, J. Differential Equations, 249 (2010), 118.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2010.02.020.  Google Scholar

[7]

O. Mali and P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Accuracy Verification Methods. Theory and Algorithms, Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, 32,, Springer, (2014).  doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7581-7.  Google Scholar

[8]

S. Matculevich and S. Repin, Computable estimates of the distance to the exact solution of the evolutionary reaction-diffusion equation,, Appl. Math. Comput., 247 (2014), 329.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.055.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Reliable methods for computer simulation, error control and a posteriori estimates,, in Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, (2004).   Google Scholar

[10]

P. Neittaanmäki and P. S. Repin, A posteriori error majorants for approximations of the evolutionary Stokes problem,, J. Numer. Math., 18 (2010), 119.  doi: 10.1515/JNUM.2010.005.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Neittaanmäki and S. Repin, Guaranteed error bounds for conforming approximations of a Maxwell type problem,, in Comput. Methods Appl. Sci., (2010), 199.  doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3239-3_15.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. E. Payne and H. F. Weinberger, An optimal Poincaré inequality for convex domains,, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 5 (1960), 286.  doi: 10.1007/BF00252910.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. I. Repin, Estimates of deviations from exact solutions of initial-boundary value problem for the heat equation,, Rend. Mat. Acc. Lincei, 13 (2002), 121.   Google Scholar

[14]

S. Repin, A posteriori estimates for partial differential equations,, in Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, (2008).  doi: 10.1515/9783110203042.  Google Scholar

[15]

S. Repin and S. Sauter, Functional a posteriori estimates for the reaction-diffusion problem,, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 343 (2006), 349.  doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2006.06.024.  Google Scholar

[16]

S. Repin and S. K. Tomar, A posteriori error estimates for approximations of evolutionary convection-diffusion problems,, J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 170 (2010), 554.  doi: 10.1007/s10958-010-0100-1.  Google Scholar

[1]

Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. A posteriori error estimates for self-similar solutions to the Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020168
[2]

Gary M. Lieberman. Schauder estimates for singular parabolic and elliptic equations of Keldysh type. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (5) : 1525-1566. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016010
[3]

Benedict Geihe, Martin Rumpf. A posteriori error estimates for sequential laminates in shape optimization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1377-1392. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016055
[4]

Judith Vancostenoble. Improved Hardy-Poincaré inequalities and sharp Carleman estimates for degenerate/singular parabolic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (3) : 761-790. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.761
[5]

Vitali Liskevich, Igor I. Skrypnik. Pointwise estimates for solutions of singular quasi-linear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (4) : 1029-1042. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1029
[6]

Huijiang Zhao. Large time decay estimates of solutions of nonlinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 69-114. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.69
[7]

Emmanuele DiBenedetto, Ugo Gianazza and Vincenzo Vespri. Intrinsic Harnack estimates for nonnegative local solutions of degenerate parabolic equations. Electronic Research Announcements, 2006, 12: 95-99.

[8]

Tianling Jin, Jingang Xiong. Schauder estimates for solutions of linear parabolic integro-differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (12) : 5977-5998. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5977
[9]

Ping Li, Pablo Raúl Stinga, José L. Torrea. On weighted mixed-norm Sobolev estimates for some basic parabolic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (3) : 855-882. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017041
[10]

Tommaso Leonori, Ireneo Peral, Ana Primo, Fernando Soria. Basic estimates for solutions of a class of nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (12) : 6031-6068. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.6031
[11]

D. Bartolucci, L. Orsina. Uniformly elliptic Liouville type equations: concentration compactness and a priori estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2005, 4 (3) : 499-522. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.499
[12]

Yutian Lei. Wolff type potential estimates and application to nonlinear equations with negative exponents. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (5) : 2067-2078. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2067
[13]

Y. Efendiev, Alexander Pankov. Meyers type estimates for approximate solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations and their applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (3) : 481-492. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.481
[14]

Jiakun Liu, Neil S. Trudinger. On Pogorelov estimates for Monge-Ampère type equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (3) : 1121-1135. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1121
[15]

Chiun-Chuan Chen, Chang-Shou Lin. Mean field equations of Liouville type with singular data: Sharper estimates. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (3) : 1237-1272. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1237
[16]

Weisong Dong, Tingting Wang, Gejun Bao. A priori estimates for the obstacle problem of Hessian type equations on Riemannian manifolds. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (5) : 1769-1780. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016013
[17]

Maria Colombo, Gianluca Crippa, Stefano Spirito. Logarithmic estimates for continuity equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (2) : 301-311. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.301
[18]

Nobuyuki Kato, Norio Kikuchi. Campanato-type boundary estimates for Rothe's scheme to parabolic partial differential systems with constant coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 19 (4) : 737-760. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.737
[19]

Tariel Sanikidze, A.F. Tedeev. On the temporal decay estimates for the degenerate parabolic system. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (4) : 1755-1768. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1755
[20]

Marina Ghisi, Massimo Gobbino. Hyperbolic--parabolic singular perturbation for mildly degenerate Kirchhoff equations: Global-in-time error estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (4) : 1313-1332. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.1313

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (28)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences