Non-integrability criterion for homogeneous Hamiltonian systems via blowing-up technique of singularities

Previous Article
Long-time behavior and stability of entropy solutions for linearly degenerate hyperbolic systems of rich type
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Simultaneous controllability of some uncoupled semilinear wave equations

August 2015, 35(8): 3707-3719. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3707

Non-integrability criterion for homogeneous Hamiltonian systems via blowing-up technique of singularities

1.	Division of Mathematical Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan

Received April 2014 Revised December 2014 Published February 2015

Abstract
Related Papers

It is a big problem to distinguish between integrable and non-integrable Hamiltonian systems. We provide a new approach to prove the non-integrability of homogeneous Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom. The homogeneous degree can be taken from real values (not necessarily integer). The proof is based on the blowing-up theory which McGehee established in the collinear three-body problem. We also compare our result with Molares-Ramis theory which is the strongest theory in this field.

Keywords: blowing-up technique, homogeneous Hamiltonian systems., Integrability.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37J30; Secondary: 70F1.

Citation: Mitsuru Shibayama. Non-integrability criterion for homogeneous Hamiltonian systems via blowing-up technique of singularities. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (8) : 3707-3719. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3707

References:

[1]	V. I. Arnol'd, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics,, $2^{nd}$ edition, (1989). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1.
[2]	H. Bruns, Über die Integrale des Vielkörper-Problems,, Acta Math., 11 (1887), 25. doi: 10.1007/BF02612319.
[3]	R. L. Devaney, Triple collision in the planar isosceles three-body problem,, Invent. Math., 60 (1980), 249. doi: 10.1007/BF01390017.
[4]	R. L. Devaney, Motion near total collapse in the planar isosceles three-body problem,, Celestial Mech., 28 (1982), 25. doi: 10.1007/BF01230657.
[5]	G. Duval and A. J. Maciejewski, Integrability of Hamiltonian systems with homogeneous potentials of degrees 2. An application of higher order variational equations,, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34 (2014), 4589. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4589.
[6]	S. Kovalevski, Sur le probleme de la rotation d'un corps solide autour d'un point fixe,, Acta Math., 12 (1889), 177. doi: 10.1007/BF02592182.
[7]	R. McGehee, Triple collision in the collinear three-body problem,, Invent. Math., 27 (1974), 191. doi: 10.1007/BF01390175.
[8]	R. Moeckel, Heteroclinic phenomena in the isosceles three-body problem,, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15 (1984), 857. doi: 10.1137/0515065.
[9]	J. J. Morales-Ruiz, Differential Galois Theory and Non-Integrability of Hamiltonian Systems,, Birkhaeuser Basel, (1999). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8718-2.
[10]	J. J. Morales-Ruiz and J. P. Ramis, A note on the non-integrability of some Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential,, Methods Appl. Anal., 8 (2001), 113.
[11]	H. Poincaré, New Methods of Celestial Mechanics Vol. 1,, American Institute of Physics, (1993).
[12]	M. E. Sansaturio, I. Vigo-Aguiar and J. M. Ferrándiz, Non-integrability of some Hamiltonian systems in polar coordinates,, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 30 (1997), 5869. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/16/026.
[13]	M. Shibayama, Non-integrability of the collinear three-body problem,, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 30 (2011), 299. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.299.
[14]	M. Shibayama and K. Yagasaki, Heteroclinic connections between triple collisions and relative periodic orbits in the isosceles three-body problem,, Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), 2377. doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/22/10/004.
[15]	H. Yoshida, Existence of exponentially unstable periodic solutions and the nonintegrability of homogeneous Hamiltonian systems,, Physica, 21 (1986), 163. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(86)90087-4.
[16]	H. Yoshida, A criterion for the nonexistence of an additional integral in Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential,, Physica, 29 (1987), 128. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(87)90050-9.
[17]	M. Yoshino, Smooth-integrable and analytic-nonintegrable resonant Hamiltonians,, RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu, B40* (2013), 177.*
[18]	S. L. Ziglin, Bifurcation of solutions and the nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics. I., Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 16 (1982), 30.
[19]	S. L. Ziglin, Bifurcation of solutions and the nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics. II., Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 17 (1983), 8.

show all references

References:

[1]	V. I. Arnol'd, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics,, $2^{nd}$ edition, (1989). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1.
[2]	H. Bruns, Über die Integrale des Vielkörper-Problems,, Acta Math., 11 (1887), 25. doi: 10.1007/BF02612319.
[3]	R. L. Devaney, Triple collision in the planar isosceles three-body problem,, Invent. Math., 60 (1980), 249. doi: 10.1007/BF01390017.
[4]	R. L. Devaney, Motion near total collapse in the planar isosceles three-body problem,, Celestial Mech., 28 (1982), 25. doi: 10.1007/BF01230657.
[5]	G. Duval and A. J. Maciejewski, Integrability of Hamiltonian systems with homogeneous potentials of degrees 2. An application of higher order variational equations,, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34 (2014), 4589. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4589.
[6]	S. Kovalevski, Sur le probleme de la rotation d'un corps solide autour d'un point fixe,, Acta Math., 12 (1889), 177. doi: 10.1007/BF02592182.
[7]	R. McGehee, Triple collision in the collinear three-body problem,, Invent. Math., 27 (1974), 191. doi: 10.1007/BF01390175.
[8]	R. Moeckel, Heteroclinic phenomena in the isosceles three-body problem,, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15 (1984), 857. doi: 10.1137/0515065.
[9]	J. J. Morales-Ruiz, Differential Galois Theory and Non-Integrability of Hamiltonian Systems,, Birkhaeuser Basel, (1999). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8718-2.
[10]	J. J. Morales-Ruiz and J. P. Ramis, A note on the non-integrability of some Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential,, Methods Appl. Anal., 8 (2001), 113.
[11]	H. Poincaré, New Methods of Celestial Mechanics Vol. 1,, American Institute of Physics, (1993).
[12]	M. E. Sansaturio, I. Vigo-Aguiar and J. M. Ferrándiz, Non-integrability of some Hamiltonian systems in polar coordinates,, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 30 (1997), 5869. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/16/026.
[13]	M. Shibayama, Non-integrability of the collinear three-body problem,, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 30 (2011), 299. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.299.
[14]	M. Shibayama and K. Yagasaki, Heteroclinic connections between triple collisions and relative periodic orbits in the isosceles three-body problem,, Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), 2377. doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/22/10/004.
[15]	H. Yoshida, Existence of exponentially unstable periodic solutions and the nonintegrability of homogeneous Hamiltonian systems,, Physica, 21 (1986), 163. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(86)90087-4.
[16]	H. Yoshida, A criterion for the nonexistence of an additional integral in Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential,, Physica, 29 (1987), 128. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(87)90050-9.
[17]	M. Yoshino, Smooth-integrable and analytic-nonintegrable resonant Hamiltonians,, RIMS Kokyuroku Bessatsu, B40* (2013), 177.*
[18]	S. L. Ziglin, Bifurcation of solutions and the nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics. I., Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 16 (1982), 30.
[19]	S. L. Ziglin, Bifurcation of solutions and the nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics. II., Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 17 (1983), 8.

[1]	Naoyuki Ishimura, Shin'ya Matsui. On blowing-up solutions of the Blasius equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (4) : 985-992. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.985
[2]	Bernard Brighi, Tewfik Sari. Blowing-up coordinates for a similarity boundary layer equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 12 (5) : 929-948. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.929
[3]	Futoshi Takahashi. Morse indices and the number of blow up points of blowing-up solutions for a Liouville equation with singular data. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 729-736. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.729
[4]	Futoshi Takahashi. An eigenvalue problem related to blowing-up solutions for a semilinear elliptic equation with the critical Sobolev exponent. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (4) : 907-922. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.907
[5]	Adrien Blanchet, Philippe Laurençot. Finite mass self-similar blowing-up solutions of a chemotaxis system with non-linear diffusion. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 47-60. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.47
[6]	Shaodong Wang. Infinitely many blowing-up solutions for Yamabe-type problems on manifolds with boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (1) : 209-230. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018013
[7]	Guillaume Duval, Andrzej J. Maciejewski. Integrability of Hamiltonian systems with homogeneous potentials of degrees $\pm 2$. An application of higher order variational equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (11) : 4589-4615. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4589
[8]	A. Ghose Choudhury, Partha Guha. Chiellini integrability condition, planar isochronous systems and Hamiltonian structures of Liénard equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (6) : 2465-2478. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017126
[9]	Jianqing Chen, Boling Guo. Sharp global existence and blowing up results for inhomogeneous Schrödinger equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (2) : 357-367. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.357
[10]	Jong-Shenq Guo, Masahiko Shimojo. Blowing up at zero points of potential for an initial boundary value problem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (1) : 161-177. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.161
[11]	P. Adda, J. L. Dimi, A. Iggidir, J. C. Kamgang, G. Sallet, J. J. Tewa. General models of host-parasite systems. Global analysis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (1) : 1-17. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.1
[12]	Fumioki Asakura, Andrea Corli. The path decomposition technique for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 15-32. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.15
[13]	Božidar Jovanović, Vladimir Jovanović. Virtual billiards in pseudo–euclidean spaces: Discrete hamiltonian and contact integrability. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (10) : 5163-5190. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017224
[14]	Shaoyun Shi, Wenlei Li. Non-integrability of generalized Yang-Mills Hamiltonian system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (4) : 1645-1655. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1645
[15]	Denis de Carvalho Braga, Luis Fernando Mello, Carmen Rocşoreanu, Mihaela Sterpu. Lyapunov coefficients for non-symmetrically coupled identical dynamical systems. Application to coupled advertising models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (3) : 785-803. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.785
[16]	Susanna Terracini, Juncheng Wei. DCDS-A Special Volume Qualitative properties of solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations and systems. Preface. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (6) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.6i
[17]	Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅰ: Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2357-2376. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017116
[18]	Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for 1D reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Part Ⅱ: periodic boundary conditions. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (1) : 285-317. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018017
[19]	Jaume Llibre, Claudia Valls. On the analytic integrability of the Liénard analytic differential systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (2) : 557-573. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.557
[20]	Larry M. Bates, Francesco Fassò, Nicola Sansonetto. The Hamilton-Jacobi equation, integrability, and nonholonomic systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 441-449. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.441

2018 Impact Factor: 1.143

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences