American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
March  2017, 37(3): 1201-1226. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017050

Strichartz estimates for charge transfer models

Gong Chen

Department of Mathematics, The University of Chicago, 5734 South University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60615, USA

Received  October 2015 Revised  November 2016 Published  December 2016

In this note, we prove Strichartz estimates for scattering states of scalar charge transfer models in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$. Following the idea of Strichartz estimates based on [3,10], we also show that the energy of the whole evolution is bounded independently of time without using the phase space method, as for example, in [5]. One can easily generalize our arguments to $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ for $n≥q3$. We also discuss the extension of these results to matrix charge transfer models in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$.

Keywords: Strichartz estimates, charge transfer model, energy boundedness.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary:35Q35, 37K40.
Citation: Gong Chen. Strichartz estimates for charge transfer models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (3) : 1201-1226. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017050
References:
[1]

K. Cai, Fine properties of charge transfer models, preprint, arXiv: math/0311048. Google Scholar

[2]

S. Cuccagna, Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54 (2001), 1110-1145.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.1018.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Cuccagna and M. Maeda, On weak interaction between a ground state and a non-textendashtrapping potential, J. Differential Equations, 256 (2014), 1395-1466.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.11.002.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. B. Erdogan and W. Schlag, Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators in the presence of a resonance and/or an eigenvalue at zero energy in dimension three: Ⅱ, J. Anal. Math., 99 (2006), 199-248.  doi: 10.1007/BF02789446.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. M. Graf, Phase space analysis of the charge transfer model, Helv. Physica Acta, 63 (1990), 107-138.   Google Scholar

[6]

J.-L. Journe, A. Soffer and C. D. Sogge, Decay estimates for Schrödinger operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 44 (1991), 573-604.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160440504.  Google Scholar

[7]

M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math., 120 (1998), 955-980.  doi: 10.1353/ajm.1998.0039.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. Linares and G. Ponce, Introduction to Nonlinear Dispersive Equations Universitext. Springer, New York, 2009. doi: 978-0-387-84898-3.  Google Scholar

[9]

I. Rodnianski and W. Schlag, Time decay for solutions of Schrödinger equations with rough and time-dependent potentials, Invent. Math., 155 (2004), 451-513.  doi: 10.1007/s00222-003-0325-4.  Google Scholar

[10]

I. Rodnianski, W. Schlag and A. Soffer, Dispersive analysis of charge transfer models, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58 (2005), 149-216.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.20066.  Google Scholar

[11]

W. Schlag, Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators: A survey, in Mathematical aspects of nonlinear dispersive equations, Ann. of Math. Stud. , (eds. J. Bourgain, C. Kenig and S. Klainerman), Princeton Univ. Press, 163 (2007), 255-285.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. Yajima, The Wk, p-continuity of wave operators for Schrödinger operators, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 47 (1995), 551-581.  doi: 10.2969/jmsj/04730551.  Google Scholar

[13]

K. Yajima, A multichannel scattering theory for some time dependent Hamiltonians, charge transfer problem, Comm. Math. Phys., 75 (1980), 153-178.  doi: 10.1007/BF01222515.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

K. Cai, Fine properties of charge transfer models, preprint, arXiv: math/0311048. Google Scholar

[2]

S. Cuccagna, Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54 (2001), 1110-1145.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.1018.  Google Scholar

[3]

S. Cuccagna and M. Maeda, On weak interaction between a ground state and a non-textendashtrapping potential, J. Differential Equations, 256 (2014), 1395-1466.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.11.002.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. B. Erdogan and W. Schlag, Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators in the presence of a resonance and/or an eigenvalue at zero energy in dimension three: Ⅱ, J. Anal. Math., 99 (2006), 199-248.  doi: 10.1007/BF02789446.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. M. Graf, Phase space analysis of the charge transfer model, Helv. Physica Acta, 63 (1990), 107-138.   Google Scholar

[6]

J.-L. Journe, A. Soffer and C. D. Sogge, Decay estimates for Schrödinger operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 44 (1991), 573-604.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160440504.  Google Scholar

[7]

M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math., 120 (1998), 955-980.  doi: 10.1353/ajm.1998.0039.  Google Scholar

[8]

L. Linares and G. Ponce, Introduction to Nonlinear Dispersive Equations Universitext. Springer, New York, 2009. doi: 978-0-387-84898-3.  Google Scholar

[9]

I. Rodnianski and W. Schlag, Time decay for solutions of Schrödinger equations with rough and time-dependent potentials, Invent. Math., 155 (2004), 451-513.  doi: 10.1007/s00222-003-0325-4.  Google Scholar

[10]

I. Rodnianski, W. Schlag and A. Soffer, Dispersive analysis of charge transfer models, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58 (2005), 149-216.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.20066.  Google Scholar

[11]

W. Schlag, Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators: A survey, in Mathematical aspects of nonlinear dispersive equations, Ann. of Math. Stud. , (eds. J. Bourgain, C. Kenig and S. Klainerman), Princeton Univ. Press, 163 (2007), 255-285.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. Yajima, The Wk, p-continuity of wave operators for Schrödinger operators, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 47 (1995), 551-581.  doi: 10.2969/jmsj/04730551.  Google Scholar

[13]

K. Yajima, A multichannel scattering theory for some time dependent Hamiltonians, charge transfer problem, Comm. Math. Phys., 75 (1980), 153-178.  doi: 10.1007/BF01222515.  Google Scholar

[1]

Joseph A. Biello, Peter R. Kramer, Yuri Lvov. Stages of energy transfer in the FPU model. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 113-122. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.113
[2]

Younghun Hong, Changhun Yang. Uniform Strichartz estimates on the lattice. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (6) : 3239-3264. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019134
[3]

Jin-Cheng Jiang, Chengbo Wang, Xin Yu. Generalized and weighted Strichartz estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (5) : 1723-1752. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1723
[4]

Robert Schippa. Generalized inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (6) : 3387-3410. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017143
[5]

Robert Schippa. Sharp Strichartz estimates in spherical coordinates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (6) : 2047-2051. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017100
[6]

Hideo Takaoka. Energy transfer model for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations on the torus. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (11) : 5819-5841. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017253
[7]

Silvia Caprino, Carlo Marchioro. On the plasma-charge model. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (2) : 241-254. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.241
[8]

Hideo Takaoka. Energy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (11) : 6351-6378. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020283
[9]

YunKyong Hyon, James E. Fonseca, Bob Eisenberg, Chun Liu. Energy variational approach to study charge inversion (layering) near charged walls. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (8) : 2725-2743. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2725
[10]

Chu-Hee Cho, Youngwoo Koh, Ihyeok Seo. On inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates for fractional Schrödinger equations and their applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (4) : 1905-1926. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1905
[11]

Vladimir Georgiev, Atanas Stefanov, Mirko Tarulli. Smoothing-Strichartz estimates for the Schrodinger equation with small magnetic potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 17 (4) : 771-786. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.771
[12]

Youngwoo Koh, Ihyeok Seo. Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger equations in weighted $L^2$ spaces and their applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (9) : 4877-4906. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017210
[13]

Seongyeon Kim, Yehyun Kwon, Ihyeok Seo. Strichartz estimates and local regularity for the elastic wave equation with singular potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (4) : 1897-1911. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020344
[14]

Younghun Hong. Strichartz estimates for $N$-body Schrödinger operators with small potential interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5355-5365. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017233
[15]

Michael Goldberg. Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger operators with a non-smooth magnetic potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (1) : 109-118. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.109
[16]

Francesco Piazza, Yves-Henri Sanejouand. Breather-mediated energy transfer in proteins. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (5) : 1247-1266. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1247
[17]

Monica Conti, Lorenzo Liverani, Vittorino Pata. A note on the energy transfer in coupled differential systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (5) : 1821-1831. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021042
[18]

Esteban Hernández, Christophe Prieur, Eduardo Cerpa. A tracking problem for the state of charge in a electrochemical Li-ion battery model. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021041
[19]

Haruya Mizutani. Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients and unbounded potentials II. Superquadratic potentials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (6) : 2177-2210. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.2177
[20]

Hyeongjin Lee, Ihyeok Seo, Jihyeon Seok. Local smoothing and Strichartz estimates for the Klein-Gordon equation with the inverse-square potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (1) : 597-608. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020024

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (92)
  • HTML views (45)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences