Understanding the effects of hurricanes and other large storms on ecological communities and the post-event recovery in these communities can guide management and ecosystem restoration. This is particularly important for communities impacted by invasive species, as the hurricane may affect control efforts. Here we consider the effect of a hurricane on tree communities in southern Florida that has been invaded by Melaleuca quinquevervia (melaleuca), an invasive Australian tree. Biological control agents were introduced starting in the 1990s and are reducing melaleuca in habitats where they are established. We used size-structured matrix modeling as a tool to project the continued possible additional effects of a hurricane on a pure stand of melaleuca that already had some level of biological control. The model results indicate that biological control could suppress or eliminate melaleuca within decades. A hurricane that does severe damage to the stand may accelerate the trend toward elimination of melaleuca with both strong and moderate biological control. However, if the biological control is weak, the stand is resilient to all but extremely severe hurricane damage. Although only a pure melaleuca stand was simulated in this study, other plants, such as natives, are likely to accelerate the decline of melaleuca due to competition. Our model provides a new tool to simulate post-hurricanes effect on invasive species and highlights the essential role that biological control has played on invasive species management.
Citation: |
Figure 6. a) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. b) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. The stand recovers from a moderate hurricane at year 400. c) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. The stand recovers only slowly from a strong hurricane at year 400. d) Effect of strong hurricane at year 400 on basal area of melaleuca stand when there is no biological control being applied. Although the effect on basal area is severe, recovery is faster than in the case where there is weak biocontrol
[1] |
P. J. Bellingham, E. V. J. Tanner and J. R. Healey, Hurricane disturbance accelerates invasion by the alien tree Pittosporum undulatum in Jamaican montane rain forests, Journal of Vegetation Science, 16 (2005), 675-684.
![]() |
[2] |
P. J. Bellingham, E. V. J. Tanner, P. H. Martin, J. R. Healey and O. R. Burge, Endemic trees in a tropical biodiversity hotspot imperilled by an invasive tree, Biological Conservation, 217 (2018), 47-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.028.![]() ![]() |
[3] |
K. K. Bohn, P. J. Minogue and E. C. Pietersen, Control of invasive Japanese climbing fern (Lygodium japonicum) and response of native ground cover during restoration of a disturbed longleaf pine ecosystem, Ecological Restoration, 29 (2011), 346-356.
![]() |
[4] |
H. Bugmann, A review of forest gap models, Climate Change, 51 (2001), 259-305.
![]() |
[5] |
T. D. Center, P. D. Pratt, P. W. Tipping, M. B. Rayamajhi, T. K. Van and S. A. Wineriter, et
al., Field colonization, population growth, and dispersal of Boreioglycaspis melaleucae Moore,
a biological control agent of the invasive tree Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake, Biological
Control, 39 (2006), 363–374.
![]() |
[6] |
T. D. Center, M. F. Purcell, P. D. Pratt, M. B. Rayamajhi, P. W. Tipping, S. A. Wright,
et al., Biological control of Melaleuca quinquenervia: An Everglades invader, Biocontrol, 57
(2012), 151–165.
![]() |
[7] |
T. D. Center, T. K. Van, M. Rayachhetry, G. R. Buckingham, F. A. Dray and S. A. Wineriter,
et al., Field colonization of the melaleuca snout beetle (Oxyops vitiosa) in south Florida,
Biological Control, 19 (2000), 112–123.
![]() |
[8] |
C. M. D'Antonio, N. E. Jackson, C. C. Horvitz and R. Hedberg, Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: Merging the study of invasion processes with management needs, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (2004), 513-521.
![]() |
[9] |
J. W. Day, D. F. Boesch, E. J. Clairain, G. P. Kemp, S. B. Laska and W. J. Mitsch, et al., Restoration of the mississippi delta: Lessons from hurricanes katrina and rita, Science, 315
(2007), 1679–1684.
doi: 10.1126/science.1137030.![]() ![]() |
[10] |
D. B. Flynn, M. Uriarte, T. Crk, J. B. Pascarella, J. K. Zimmerman and T. M. Aide, et al,
Hurricane disturbance alters secondary forest recovery in puerto rico, Biotropica, 42 (2010),
149–157.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00581.x.![]() ![]() |
[11] |
T. K. Henkel, J. Q. Chambers and D. A. Baker, Delayed tree mortality and Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) population explosion in a Louisiana bottomland hardwood forest following Hurricane Katrina, Forest Ecology and Management, 378 (2017), 222-232.
![]() |
[12] |
C. C. Horvitz, J. B. Pascarella, S. McMann, A. Freedman and R. H. Hoffstetter, Functional roles of invasive non-indigenous plants in hurricane-affected subtropical hardwood forests, Ecological Applications, 8 (1998), 947-974.
![]() |
[13] |
N. Ishshalom, L. D. L. Sternberg, M. Ross, J. O'brien and L. Flynn, Water Utilization of Tropical Hardwood Hammocks of the Lower Florida Keys, Oecologia, 92 (1992), 108-112.
![]() |
[14] |
D. M. Lieurance, Biomass allocation of the invasive tree Acacia auriculiformis and refoliation following hurricane-force winds, Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 134 (2007), 389-397.
![]() |
[15] |
S. M. Louda, Negative ecological effects of the musk thistle biological control agent, Rhinocyllus conicus, Nontarget Effects of Biological Control, Springer, 2000,215–243.
![]() |
[16] |
L. McAlpine and S. Porder, Evaluation of a large-scale invasive plant species herbicide control program in the Berkshire Taconic Plateau, Massachusetts, USA, Conservation Evidence, 6 (2006), 117-123.
![]() |
[17] |
P. D. Pratt, M. B. Rayamajhi, T. K. Van, T. D. Center and P. W. Tipping, Herbivory alters resource allocation and compensation in the invasive tree Melaleuca quinquenervia, Ecological Entomology, 30 (2005), 316-326.
![]() |
[18] |
M. B. Rayamajhi, P. D. Pratt, T. D. Center, P. W. Tipping and T. K. Van, A review of forest gap models, Climate Change, 51 (2001), 259-305.
![]() |
[19] |
M. B. Rayamajhi, T. K. Van, P. D. Pratt, T. D. Center and P. W. Tipping, Melaleuca quinquenervia dominated forests in Florida: Analyses of natural-enemy impacts on stand dynamics, Plant Ecology, 192 (2007), 119-132.
![]() |
[20] |
L. Sevillano, The Effects of Biological Control Agents on Population Growth and Spread of Melaleuca Quinquenervia, Ph.D thesis, University of Miami, 2010.
![]() |
[21] |
L. Sevillano, C. C. Horvitz and P. D. Pratt, Natural enemy density and soil type influence growth and survival of Melaleuca quinquenervia seedlings, Biol Control., 53 (2010), 168-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.01.006.![]() ![]() |
[22] |
A. A. Sher, H. El Waer, E. Gonzalez, R. Anderson, A. L. Henry and R. Bierdon, et al.,
Native species recovery after reduction of an invasive tree by biological control with and
without active removal, Ecological Engineering, 111 (2018), 167–175.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.018.![]() ![]() |
[23] |
J. Snitzer, D. Boucher and K. Kyde, Response of exotic invasive plant species to forest damage caused by Hurricane Isabel. Hurricane Isabel in perspective, Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication, 1 (2005), 5-160.
![]() |
[24] |
J. Thompson, A. E. Lugo and J. Thomlinson, Land use history, hurricane disturbance, and the fate of introduced species in a subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico, Plant Ecology, 192 (2007), 289-301.
doi: 10.1007/s11258-007-9318-5.![]() ![]() |
[25] |
P. W. Tipping, M. R. Martin, K. R. Nimmo, R. M. Pierce, M. D. Smart and E. White, et
al., Invasion of a West Everglades wetland by Melaleuca quinquenervia countered by classical
biological control, Biological Control, 48 (2009), 73–78.
![]() |
[26] |
P. W. Tipping, M. R. Martin, P. D. Pratt, T. D. Center and M. B. Rayamajhi, Suppression of growth and reproduction of an exotic invasive tree by two introduced insects, Biological Control, 44 (2008), 235-241.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.011.![]() ![]() |
[27] |
A. Wright and L. Skilling (eds), Herbicide Toxicity and Biological Control Agents, Proceedings of the Eighth Australian Weeds Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 21-25 September, 1987, Weed Society of New South Wales, Australia, 1987.
![]() |
[28] |
W. M. Xi, R. K. Peet and D. L. Urban, Changes in forest structure, species diversity and spatial pattern following hurricane disturbance in a Piedmont North Carolina forest, USA, Journal of Plant Ecology, 1 (2008), 43-57.
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtm003.![]() ![]() |
[29] |
B. Zhang, D. L. DeAngelis, M. B. Rayamajhi and D. Botkin, Modeling the long-term effects of introduced herbivores on the spread of an invasive tree, Landscape Ecology, 32 (2017), 1147-1161.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0519-6.![]() ![]() |
[30] |
B. Zhang, X. Liu, D. L. DeAngelis, L. Zhai, M. B. Rayamajhi and S. Ju, Modeling the compensatory response of an invasive tree to specialist insect herbivory, Biological Control, 117 (2018), 128-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.11.002.![]() ![]() |
[31] |
J. K. Zimmerman, W. M. Pulliam, D. J. Lodge, V. Quinonesorfila, N. Fetcher and S. Guzmangrajales, et al., Nitrogen immobilization by decomposing woody debris and the recovery
of tropical wet forest from hurricane damage, Oikos, 72 (1995), 314–322.
doi: 10.2307/3546116.![]() ![]() |
[32] |
F. A. Dray, Jr, B. C. Bennett, and T. D. Center, Invasion history of Melaleuca quinquenervia
(Cav.) S.T. Blake in Florida, Castanea, 71 (2006), 210–225.
doi: 10.2179/05-27.1.![]() ![]() |
a) Simulated basal area of 0.1 ha melaleuca stand at year 200. b)Simulated size structure near steady state of 0.01 ha melaleuca at year 200 of simulation
a-d. Simulated size structure near steady state of 0.01 ha melaleuca 4, 8, 16 and 32 years after application of strong biological control
a) Simulated decline in basal area of melaleuca stand after start of strong biological control in year 200 of simulation. b) Simulated decline in basal area of melaleuca stand after start of strong biological control in year 200 with moderate hurricane in year 216 of simulation
a-d. Simulated size structure near steady state of 0.01 ha melaleuca 4, 8, 16 and 32 years after application of moderate biological control
a) Simulated decline in basal area of melaleuca stand after start of moderate biological control in year 200 of simulation. b) Simulated decline in basal area of melaleuca stand after start of moderate biological control in year 200 with moderate hurricane in year 2016
a) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. b) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. The stand recovers from a moderate hurricane at year 400. c) Application of weak biological control decreases steady state values of total basal area of melaleuca stand to a lower level. The stand recovers only slowly from a strong hurricane at year 400. d) Effect of strong hurricane at year 400 on basal area of melaleuca stand when there is no biological control being applied. Although the effect on basal area is severe, recovery is faster than in the case where there is weak biocontrol