A unified approach for energy scattering for focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Previous Article
On the global well-posedness of the axisymmetric viscous Boussinesq system in critical Lebesgue spaces
DCDS Home
This Issue
Next Article
Identifying varying magnetic anomalies using geomagnetic monitoring

November 2020, 40(11): 6441-6471. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020286

A unified approach for energy scattering for focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Van Duong Dinh ^1,2,

1.	Laboratoire Paul Painlevé UMR 8524, Université de Lille CNRS, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France
2.	Department of Mathematics, HCMC University of Education, 280 An Duong Vuong, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

Received March 2020 Published July 2020

We consider the Cauchy problem for focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation

$ i\partial_t u + \Delta u = - |u|^\alpha u, \quad (t, x) \in \mathbb R \times \mathbb R^N, $

where

$ N\geq 1 $

,

$ \alpha>\frac{4}{N} $

and

$ \alpha <\frac{4}{N-2} $

if

$ N\geq 3 $

. We give a criterion for energy scattering for the equation that covers well-known scattering results below, at and above the mass and energy ground state threshold. The proof is based on a recent argument of Dodson-Murphy [Math. Res. Lett. 25(6):1805-1825, 2018] using the interaction Morawetz estimate.

Keywords: Nonlinear Schrödinger equation, ground state, global well-posedness, compactness, scattering.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35A01; Secondary: 35Q55.

Citation: Van Duong Dinh. A unified approach for energy scattering for focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (11) : 6441-6471. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020286

References:

[1]	T. Akahori and H. Nawa, Blowup and scattering problems for the nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Kyoto J. Math., 53 (2013), 629-672. doi: 10.1215/21562261-2265914.
[2]	A. K. Arora, B. Dodson and J. Murphy, Scattering below the ground state for the 2D radial nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), 1653-1663. doi: 10.1090/proc/14824.
[3]	T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 10, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. doi: 10.1090/cln/010.
[4]	T. Cazenave and F. B. Weissler, Rapidly decaying solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 147 (1992), 75-100. doi: 10.1007/BF02099529.
[5]	B. Dodson and J. Murphy, A new proof of scattering below the ground state for the non-radial focusing NLS, Math. Res. Lett., 25 (2018), 1805-1825. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n6.a5.
[6]	T. Duyckaerts, J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, Scattering for the non-radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Math. Res. Lett., 15 (2008), 1233-1250. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2008.v15.n6.a13.
[7]	T. Duyckaerts and S. Roudenko, Threshold solutions for the focusing 3D cubic Schrödinger equation, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 26 (2010), 1-56. doi: 10.4171/RMI/592.
[8]	T. Duyckaerts and S. Roudenko, Going beyond the threshold: Scattering and blpw-up in the focusing NLS equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 334 (2015), 1573-1615. doi: 10.1007/s00220-014-2202-y.
[9]	D. Fang, J. Xie and T. Cazenave, Scattering for the focusing energy-subcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Sci. China Math., 54 (2011), 2037-2062. doi: 10.1007/s11425-011-4283-9.
[10]	Y. Gao and Z. Wang, Below and beyond the mass-energy threshold: Scattering for the Hartree equation with radial data in $d\geq 5$, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 71 (2020), 23pp. doi: 10.1007/s00033-020-1274-0.
[11]	C. D. Guevara, Global behavior of finite energy solutions to the $d$-dimensional focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Math. Res. Express. AMRX, 2014, 177–243. doi: 10.1002/cta.2381.
[12]	J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, A sharp condition for scattering of the radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys., 282 (2008), 435-467. doi: 10.1007/s00220-008-0529-y.
[13]	M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math., 120 (1998), 955-980. doi: 10.1353/ajm.1998.0039.
[14]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4.
[15]	P.-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 1 (1984), 109-145. doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30428-0.
[16]	S. Xia and C. Xu, On dynamics of the system of two coupled nonlinear Schrödinger in $ \mathbb R^3$, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 7096-7112. doi: 10.1002/mma.5814.

show all references

References:

[1]	T. Akahori and H. Nawa, Blowup and scattering problems for the nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Kyoto J. Math., 53 (2013), 629-672. doi: 10.1215/21562261-2265914.
[2]	A. K. Arora, B. Dodson and J. Murphy, Scattering below the ground state for the 2D radial nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), 1653-1663. doi: 10.1090/proc/14824.
[3]	T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 10, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. doi: 10.1090/cln/010.
[4]	T. Cazenave and F. B. Weissler, Rapidly decaying solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 147 (1992), 75-100. doi: 10.1007/BF02099529.
[5]	B. Dodson and J. Murphy, A new proof of scattering below the ground state for the non-radial focusing NLS, Math. Res. Lett., 25 (2018), 1805-1825. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n6.a5.
[6]	T. Duyckaerts, J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, Scattering for the non-radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Math. Res. Lett., 15 (2008), 1233-1250. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2008.v15.n6.a13.
[7]	T. Duyckaerts and S. Roudenko, Threshold solutions for the focusing 3D cubic Schrödinger equation, Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 26 (2010), 1-56. doi: 10.4171/RMI/592.
[8]	T. Duyckaerts and S. Roudenko, Going beyond the threshold: Scattering and blpw-up in the focusing NLS equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 334 (2015), 1573-1615. doi: 10.1007/s00220-014-2202-y.
[9]	D. Fang, J. Xie and T. Cazenave, Scattering for the focusing energy-subcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Sci. China Math., 54 (2011), 2037-2062. doi: 10.1007/s11425-011-4283-9.
[10]	Y. Gao and Z. Wang, Below and beyond the mass-energy threshold: Scattering for the Hartree equation with radial data in $d\geq 5$, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 71 (2020), 23pp. doi: 10.1007/s00033-020-1274-0.
[11]	C. D. Guevara, Global behavior of finite energy solutions to the $d$-dimensional focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Math. Res. Express. AMRX, 2014, 177–243. doi: 10.1002/cta.2381.
[12]	J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, A sharp condition for scattering of the radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys., 282 (2008), 435-467. doi: 10.1007/s00220-008-0529-y.
[13]	M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math., 120 (1998), 955-980. doi: 10.1353/ajm.1998.0039.
[14]	C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645-675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4.
[15]	P.-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case. I, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 1 (1984), 109-145. doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30428-0.
[16]	S. Xia and C. Xu, On dynamics of the system of two coupled nonlinear Schrödinger in $ \mathbb R^3$, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 7096-7112. doi: 10.1002/mma.5814.

[1]	Benjamin Dodson. Global well-posedness and scattering for the defocusing, cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation when $n = 3$ via a linear-nonlinear decomposition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (5) : 1905-1926. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1905
[2]	Takafumi Akahori. Low regularity global well-posedness for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on closed manifolds. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (2) : 261-280. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.261
[3]	Daniela De Silva, Nataša Pavlović, Gigliola Staffilani, Nikolaos Tzirakis. Global well-posedness for a periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in 1D and 2D. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (1) : 37-65. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.37
[4]	Zihua Guo, Yifei Wu. Global well-posedness for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation in $H^{\frac 12} (\mathbb{R} )$. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (1) : 257-264. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017010
[5]	Daniela De Silva, Nataša Pavlović, Gigliola Staffilani, Nikolaos Tzirakis. Global well-posedness for the $L^2$ critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in higher dimensions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1023-1041. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1023
[6]	Chao Yang. Sharp condition of global well-posedness for inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (12) : 4631-4642. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021136
[7]	Lassaad Aloui, Slim Tayachi. Local well-posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (11) : 5409-5437. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021082
[8]	Hiroyuki Hirayama, Mamoru Okamoto. Well-posedness and scattering for fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger type equations at the scaling critical regularity. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (3) : 831-851. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.831
[9]	Hiroyuki Hirayama. Well-posedness and scattering for a system of quadratic derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations with low regularity initial data. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (4) : 1563-1591. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1563
[10]	Chenmin Sun, Hua Wang, Xiaohua Yao, Jiqiang Zheng. Scattering below ground state of focusing fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with radial data. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (4) : 2207-2228. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018091
[11]	Changxing Miao, Bo Zhang. Global well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 17 (1) : 181-200. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.181
[12]	Yonggeun Cho, Gyeongha Hwang, Tohru Ozawa. Global well-posedness of critical nonlinear Schrödinger equations below $L^2$. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (4) : 1389-1405. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1389
[13]	Yuanyuan Ren, Yongsheng Li, Wei Yan. Sharp well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 487-504. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018027
[14]	Jun-ichi Segata. Well-posedness and existence of standing waves for the fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger type equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (3) : 1093-1105. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1093
[15]	Kelin Li, Huafei Di. On the well-posedness and stability for the fourth-order Schrödinger equation with nonlinear derivative term. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (12) : 4293-4320. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021122
[16]	Boling Guo, Jun Wu. Well-posedness of the initial-boundary value problem for the fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (7) : 3749-3778. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021205
[17]	Massimo Cicognani, Michael Reissig. Well-posedness for degenerate Schrödinger equations. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2014, 3 (1) : 15-33. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.15
[18]	Shaoming Guo, Xianfeng Ren, Baoxiang Wang. Local well-posedness for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with $ L^2 $-subcritical data. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (9) : 4207-4253. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021034
[19]	Tarek Saanouni. Global well-posedness of some high-order semilinear wave and Schrödinger type equations with exponential nonlinearity. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (1) : 273-291. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.273
[20]	Ademir Pastor. On three-wave interaction Schrödinger systems with quadratic nonlinearities: Global well-posedness and standing waves. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2217-2242. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019100

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Van Duong Dinh
on Google Scholar
Van Duong Dinh

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588

Tools

Article outline

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Van Duong Dinh
on Google Scholar
Van Duong Dinh

[Back to Top]