American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2022, 42(6): 2775-2793. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021211

On $ n $-tuplewise IP-sensitivity and thick sensitivity

Jian Li and  Yini Yang

Department of Mathematics, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, 515063, China

Received  May 2021 Revised  November 2021 Published  June 2022 Early access  January 2022

Fund Project: The authors were supported by NNSF of China (11771264, 11871188) and NSF of Guangdong Province (2018B030306024)

Let
$ (X,T) $
 be a topological dynamical system and
$ n\geq 2 $
. We say that
$ (X,T) $
 is
$ n $
-tuplewise IP-sensitive (resp.
$ n $
-tuplewise thickly sensitive) if there exists a constant
$ \delta>0 $
 with the property that for each non-empty open subset
$ U $
 of
$ X $
, there exist
$ x_1,x_2,\dotsc,x_n\in U $
 such that
$ \Bigl\{k\in \mathbb{N}\colon \min\limits_{1\le i<j\le n}d(T^k x_i,T^k x_j)>\delta\Bigr\} $
is an IP-set (resp. a thick set).
We obtain several sufficient and necessary conditions of a dynamical system to be
$ n $
-tuplewise IP-sensitive or
$ n $
-tuplewise thickly sensitive and show that any non-trivial weakly mixing system is
$ n $
-tuplewise IP-sensitive for all
$ n\geq 2 $
, while it is
$ n $
-tuplewise thickly sensitive if and only if it has at least
$ n $
 minimal points. We characterize two kinds of sensitivity by considering some kind of factor maps. We introduce the opposite side of pairwise IP-sensitivity and pairwise thick sensitivity, named (almost) pairwise IP
$ ^* $
-equicontinuity and (almost) pairwise syndetic equicontinuity, and obtain dichotomies results for them. In particular, we show that a minimal system is distal if and only if it is pairwise IP
$ ^* $
-equicontinuous. We show that every minimal system admits a maximal almost pairwise IP
$ ^* $
-equicontinuous factor and admits a maximal pairwise syndetic equicontinuous factor, and characterize them by the factor maps to their maximal distal factors.
Keywords: Sensitivity, equicontinuity, IP-set, thick set, minimal system, distal factor.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37B05, 37B25.
Citation: Jian Li, Yini Yang. On $ n $-tuplewise IP-sensitivity and thick sensitivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2022, 42 (6) : 2775-2793. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021211
References:
[1]

E. Akin, Recurrence in Topological Dynamics, Furstenberg Families and Ellis Actions, The University Series in Mathematics, Plenum Press, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2668-8.

[2]

J. Auslander, On the proximal relation in topological dynamics, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1960), 890-895.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1960-0164335-7.

[3]

J. Auslander, Minimal Flows and Their Extensions, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153. Mathematical Notes, 122. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1988.

[4]

J. Auslander and J. A. Yorke, Interval maps, factors of maps, and chaos, Tohoku Math. J. (2), 32 (1980), 177-188.  doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178229634.

[5]

L. Auslander, L. Green and F. Hahn, Flows on Homogeneous Spaces, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 53, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1963.

[6]

J. Clay, Variations on equicontinuity, Duke Math. J., 30 (1963), 423-431.  doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-63-03045-X.

[7]

J. P. Clay, Proximity relations in transformation groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 108 (1963), 88-96.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1963-0154269-3.

[8]

R. Ellis and W. H. Gottschalk, Homomorphisms of transformation groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 94 (1960), 258-271.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1960-0123635-1.

[9]

S. Fomin, On dynamical systems with a purely point spectrum (in Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 77 (1951), 29-32. 

[10]

H. Furstenberg, Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus, Amer. J. Math., 83 (1961), 573-601.  doi: 10.2307/2372899.

[11]

H. Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Syst. Theory, 1 (1967), 1-49.  doi: 10.1007/BF01692494.

[12]

H. Furstenberg, Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory, M. B. Porter Lectures, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1981.

[13]

W. H. He and Z. L. Zhou, A topologically mixing system whose measure center is a singleton, Acta Math. Sinica (Chin. Ser.), 45 (2002), 929-934. 

[14]

W. Huang, S. Kolyada and G. Zhang, Analogues of Auslander-Yorke theorems for multi-sensitivity, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 38 (2018), 651-665.  doi: 10.1017/etds.2016.48.

[15]

W. Huang, D. Khilko, S. Kolyada, A. Peris and G. Zhang, Finite intersection property and dynamical compactness, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 30 (2018), 1221-1245.  doi: 10.1007/s10884-017-9600-8.

[16]

J. Li, Dynamical characterization of C-sets and its application, Fund. Math., 216 (2012), 259-286.  doi: 10.4064/fm216-3-4.

[17]

J. Li, S. Tu and X. Ye, Mean equicontinuity and mean sensitivity, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 35 (2015), 2587-2612.  doi: 10.1017/etds.2014.41.

[18]

J. Li and X. D. Ye, Recent development of chaos theory in topological dynamics, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 32 (2016), 83-114.  doi: 10.1007/s10114-015-4574-0.

[19]

J. Li and Y. Yang, Stronger versions of sensitivity for minimal group actions, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 37 (2021), 1933-1946.  doi: 10.1007/s10114-021-0511-6.

[20]

J. Li, X. Ye and T. Yu, Mean equicontinuity, complexity and applications, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021), 359-393.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020167.

[21]

T. K. S. Moothathu, Stronger forms of sensitivity for dynamical systems, Nonlinearity, 20 (2007), 2115-2126.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/20/9/006.

[22]

F. Tan and R. Zhang, On $\mathcal{F}$-sensitive pairs, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 31 (2011), 1425-1435.  doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(11)60328-7.

[23]

J. de Vries, Elements of Topological Dynamics, Mathematics and its Applications, 257. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-8171-4.

[24]

J. Xiong, Chaos in a topologically transitive system, Sci. China Ser. A, 48 (2005), 929-939.  doi: 10.1007/BF02879075.

[25]

X. Ye and T. Yu, Sensitivity, proximal extension and higher order almost automorphy, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370 (2018), 3639-3662.  doi: 10.1090/tran/7100.

show all references

References:
[1]

E. Akin, Recurrence in Topological Dynamics, Furstenberg Families and Ellis Actions, The University Series in Mathematics, Plenum Press, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2668-8.

[2]

J. Auslander, On the proximal relation in topological dynamics, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1960), 890-895.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1960-0164335-7.

[3]

J. Auslander, Minimal Flows and Their Extensions, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153. Mathematical Notes, 122. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1988.

[4]

J. Auslander and J. A. Yorke, Interval maps, factors of maps, and chaos, Tohoku Math. J. (2), 32 (1980), 177-188.  doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178229634.

[5]

L. Auslander, L. Green and F. Hahn, Flows on Homogeneous Spaces, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 53, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1963.

[6]

J. Clay, Variations on equicontinuity, Duke Math. J., 30 (1963), 423-431.  doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-63-03045-X.

[7]

J. P. Clay, Proximity relations in transformation groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 108 (1963), 88-96.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1963-0154269-3.

[8]

R. Ellis and W. H. Gottschalk, Homomorphisms of transformation groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 94 (1960), 258-271.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1960-0123635-1.

[9]

S. Fomin, On dynamical systems with a purely point spectrum (in Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 77 (1951), 29-32. 

[10]

H. Furstenberg, Strict ergodicity and transformation of the torus, Amer. J. Math., 83 (1961), 573-601.  doi: 10.2307/2372899.

[11]

H. Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Syst. Theory, 1 (1967), 1-49.  doi: 10.1007/BF01692494.

[12]

H. Furstenberg, Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory, M. B. Porter Lectures, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1981.

[13]

W. H. He and Z. L. Zhou, A topologically mixing system whose measure center is a singleton, Acta Math. Sinica (Chin. Ser.), 45 (2002), 929-934. 

[14]

W. Huang, S. Kolyada and G. Zhang, Analogues of Auslander-Yorke theorems for multi-sensitivity, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 38 (2018), 651-665.  doi: 10.1017/etds.2016.48.

[15]

W. Huang, D. Khilko, S. Kolyada, A. Peris and G. Zhang, Finite intersection property and dynamical compactness, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 30 (2018), 1221-1245.  doi: 10.1007/s10884-017-9600-8.

[16]

J. Li, Dynamical characterization of C-sets and its application, Fund. Math., 216 (2012), 259-286.  doi: 10.4064/fm216-3-4.

[17]

J. Li, S. Tu and X. Ye, Mean equicontinuity and mean sensitivity, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 35 (2015), 2587-2612.  doi: 10.1017/etds.2014.41.

[18]

J. Li and X. D. Ye, Recent development of chaos theory in topological dynamics, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 32 (2016), 83-114.  doi: 10.1007/s10114-015-4574-0.

[19]

J. Li and Y. Yang, Stronger versions of sensitivity for minimal group actions, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 37 (2021), 1933-1946.  doi: 10.1007/s10114-021-0511-6.

[20]

J. Li, X. Ye and T. Yu, Mean equicontinuity, complexity and applications, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021), 359-393.  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020167.

[21]

T. K. S. Moothathu, Stronger forms of sensitivity for dynamical systems, Nonlinearity, 20 (2007), 2115-2126.  doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/20/9/006.

[22]

F. Tan and R. Zhang, On $\mathcal{F}$-sensitive pairs, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 31 (2011), 1425-1435.  doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(11)60328-7.

[23]

J. de Vries, Elements of Topological Dynamics, Mathematics and its Applications, 257. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-8171-4.

[24]

J. Xiong, Chaos in a topologically transitive system, Sci. China Ser. A, 48 (2005), 929-939.  doi: 10.1007/BF02879075.

[25]

X. Ye and T. Yu, Sensitivity, proximal extension and higher order almost automorphy, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370 (2018), 3639-3662.  doi: 10.1090/tran/7100.

[1]

Zhenhua Peng, Zhongping Wan, Weizhi Xiong. Sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under strictly minimal efficiency. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 427-436. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017022
[2]

Nancy Guelman, Jorge Iglesias, Aldo Portela. Examples of minimal set for IFSs. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5253-5269. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017227
[3]

Mohsen Tourang, Mostafa Zangiabadi, Chaoqian Li. Generalized minimal Gershgorin set for tensors. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022106
[4]

Alireza Ghaffari Hadigheh, Tamás Terlaky. Generalized support set invariancy sensitivity analysis in linear optimization. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (1) : 1-18. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.1
[5]

Behrouz Kheirfam, Kamal mirnia. Comments on ''Generalized support set invariancy sensitivity analysis in linear optimization''. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (3) : 611-616. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.611
[6]

Irene Márquez-Corbella, Edgar Martínez-Moro. Algebraic structure of the minimal support codewords set of some linear codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2011, 5 (2) : 233-244. doi: 10.3934/amc.2011.5.233
[7]

María Isabel Cortez, Samuel Petite. Realization of big centralizers of minimal aperiodic actions on the Cantor set. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (5) : 2891-2901. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020153
[8]

Gernot Greschonig. Real cocycles of point-distal minimal flows. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 540-548. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0540
[9]

Lan Wen. On the preperiodic set. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (1) : 237-241. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.237
[10]

Chris Good, Robert Leek, Joel Mitchell. Equicontinuity, transitivity and sensitivity: The Auslander-Yorke dichotomy revisited. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (4) : 2441-2474. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020121
[11]

François Berteloot, Tien-Cuong Dinh. The Mandelbrot set is the shadow of a Julia set. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (12) : 6611-6633. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020262
[12]

Yihong Xu, Zhenhua Peng. Higher-order sensitivity analysis in set-valued optimization under Henig efficiency. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 313-327. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016019
[13]

Alexander Blokh, Michał Misiurewicz. Dense set of negative Schwarzian maps whose critical points have minimal limit sets. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1998, 4 (1) : 141-158. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.141
[14]

Marcin Studniarski. Finding all minimal elements of a finite partially ordered set by genetic algorithm with a prescribed probability. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2011, 1 (3) : 389-398. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.389
[15]

Tiago Carvalho, Luiz Fernando Gonçalves. A flow on $ S^2 $ presenting the ball as its minimal set. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (8) : 4263-4280. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020287
[16]

James W. Cannon, Mark H. Meilstrup, Andreas Zastrow. The period set of a map from the Cantor set to itself. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (7) : 2667-2679. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2667
[17]

Luke G. Rogers, Alexander Teplyaev. Laplacians on the basilica Julia set. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (1) : 211-231. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.211
[18]

Jiawei Chen, Zhongping Wan, Liuyang Yuan. Existence of solutions and $\alpha$-well-posedness for a system of constrained set-valued variational inequalities. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2013, 3 (3) : 567-581. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.567
[19]

Yukio Kan-On. Structure on the set of radially symmetric positive stationary solutions for a competition-diffusion system. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 427-436. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.427
[20]

Yu Zhang, Tao Chen. Minimax problems for set-valued mappings with set optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2014, 4 (4) : 327-340. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.327

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (237)
  • HTML views (148)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy