Positivity property of second-order flux-splitting schemes for the compressible Euler equations

Previous Article
Blue sky catastrophes in weakly coupled chains of reversible oscillators
DCDS-B Home
This Issue
Next Article
On the Wang Chang-Uhlenbeck equations

May 2003, 3(2): 201-228. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.201

Positivity property of second-order flux-splitting schemes for the compressible Euler equations

1.	Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-5701, United States
2.	IPST and Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States

Received April 2002 Revised January 2003 Published February 2003

Abstract
Related Papers

A class of upwind flux splitting methods in the Euler equations of compressible flow is considered in this paper. Using the property that Euler flux $F(U)$ is a homogeneous function of degree one in $U$, we reformulate the splitting fluxes with $F^{+}=A^{+} U$, $F^{-}=A^{-} U$, and the corresponding matrices are either symmetric or symmetrizable and keep only non-negative and non-positive eigenvalues. That leads to the conclusion that the first order schemes are positive in the sense of Lax-Liu [18], which implies that it is $L^2$-stable in some suitable sense. Moreover, the second order scheme is a stable perturbation of the first order scheme, so that the positivity of the second order schemes is also established, under a CFL-like condition. In addition, these splitting methods preserve the positivity of density and energy.

Keywords: limiter function, positivity., flux splitting, Conservation laws.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 65M12, 35L6.

Citation: Cheng Wang, Jian-Guo Liu. Positivity property of second-order flux-splitting schemes for the compressible Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (2) : 201-228. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.201

[1]	Mauro Garavello, Roberto Natalini, Benedetto Piccoli, Andrea Terracina. Conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (1) : 159-179. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.159
[2]	Boris Andreianov, Kenneth H. Karlsen, Nils H. Risebro. On vanishing viscosity approximation of conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (3) : 617-633. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.617
[3]	Adimurthi , Shyam Sundar Ghoshal, G. D. Veerappa Gowda. Exact controllability of scalar conservation laws with strict convex flux. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2014, 4 (4) : 401-449. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2014.4.401
[4]	Maria Laura Delle Monache, Paola Goatin. Stability estimates for scalar conservation laws with moving flux constraints. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (2) : 245-258. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017010
[5]	Darko Mitrovic. New entropy conditions for scalar conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 30 (4) : 1191-1210. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.1191
[6]	Anupam Sen, T. Raja Sekhar. Structural stability of the Riemann solution for a strictly hyperbolic system of conservation laws with flux approximation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (2) : 931-942. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019045
[7]	Avner Friedman. Conservation laws in mathematical biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (9) : 3081-3097. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3081
[8]	Mauro Garavello. A review of conservation laws on networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (3) : 565-581. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.565
[9]	Len G. Margolin, Roy S. Baty. Conservation laws in discrete geometry. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (2) : 187-203. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019010
[10]	Wen-Xiu Ma. Conservation laws by symmetries and adjoint symmetries. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 707-721. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018044
[11]	Tai-Ping Liu, Shih-Hsien Yu. Hyperbolic conservation laws and dynamic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (1) : 143-145. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.143
[12]	Yanbo Hu, Wancheng Sheng. The Riemann problem of conservation laws in magnetogasdynamics. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (2) : 755-769. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.755
[13]	Stefano Bianchini, Elio Marconi. On the concentration of entropy for scalar conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 73-88. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.73
[14]	Julien Jimenez. Scalar conservation law with discontinuous flux in a bounded domain. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 520-530. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.520
[15]	Jingwei Hu, Shi Jin. On kinetic flux vector splitting schemes for quantum Euler equations. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 517-530. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.517
[16]	Christophe Prieur. Control of systems of conservation laws with boundary errors. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (2) : 393-407. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.393
[17]	Alberto Bressan, Marta Lewicka. A uniqueness condition for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (3) : 673-682. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.673
[18]	Rinaldo M. Colombo, Kenneth H. Karlsen, Frédéric Lagoutière, Andrea Marson. Special issue on contemporary topics in conservation laws. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (2) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.2i
[19]	Laurent Lévi, Julien Jimenez. Coupling of scalar conservation laws in stratified porous media. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 644-654. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.644
[20]	Alexander Bobylev, Mirela Vinerean, Åsa Windfäll. Discrete velocity models of the Boltzmann equation and conservation laws. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 35-58. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.35

2017 Impact Factor: 0.972

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences