# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

February  2005, 5(1): 153-174. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.153

## Theory and simulation of real and ideal magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

 1 Advanced Space Propulsion Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, United States

Received  September 2003 Revised  January 2004 Published  November 2004

Incompressible, homogeneous magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence consists of fluctuating vorticity and magnetic fi elds, which are represented in terms of their Fourier coefficients. Here, a set of fi ve Fourier spectral transform method numerical simulations of two-dimensional (2-D) MHD turbulence on a $512^2$ grid is described. Each simulation is a numerically realized dynamical system consisting of Fourier modes associated with wave vectors $\mathbf{k}$, with integer components, such that $k = |\mathbf{k}| \le k_{max}$. The simulation set consists of one ideal (non-dissipative) case and four real (dissipative) cases. All fi ve runs had equivalent initial conditions. The dimensions of the dynamical systems associated with these cases are the numbers of independent real and imaginary parts of the Fourier modes. The ideal simulation has a dimension of $366104$, while each real simulation has a dimension of $411712$. The real runs vary in magnetic Prandtl number $P_M$, with $P_M \in {0.1, 0.25, 1, 4}$. In the results presented here, all runs have been taken to a simulation time of $t = 25$. Although ideal and real Fourier spectra are quite di fferent at high $k$, they are similar at low values of $k$. Their low $k$ behavior indicates the existence of broken symmetry and coherent structure in real MHD turbulence, similar to what exists in ideal MHD turbulence. The value of $P_M$ strongly affects the ratio of kinetic to magnetic energy and energy dissipation (which is mostly ohmic). The relevance of these results to 3-D Navier-Stokes and MHD turbulence is discussed.
Citation: John V. Shebalin. Theory and simulation of real and ideal magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (1) : 153-174. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.153
 [1] Sara Barile, Addolorata Salvatore. Radial solutions of semilinear elliptic equations with broken symmetry on unbounded domains. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 41-49. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.41 [2] Yakov Krasnov, Alexander Kononovich, Grigory Osharovich. On a structure of the fixed point set of homogeneous maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (4) : 1017-1027. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1017 [3] Álvaro Bustos. Extended symmetry groups of multidimensional subshifts with hierarchical structure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (10) : 5869-5895. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020250 [4] Christine Chambers, Nassif Ghoussoub. Deformation from symmetry and multiplicity of solutions in non-homogeneous problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 267-281. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.267 [5] Piotr Oprocha. Coherent lists and chaotic sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (3) : 797-825. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.797 [6] François Baccelli, Augustin Chaintreau, Danny De Vleeschauwer, David R. McDonald. HTTP turbulence. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (1) : 1-40. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.1 [7] Yang Zhang. Artifacts in the inversion of the broken ray transform in the plane. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (1) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019061 [8] Eric Falcon. Laboratory experiments on wave turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (4) : 819-840. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.819 [9] Mark Hubenthal. The broken ray transform in $n$ dimensions with flat reflecting boundary. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (1) : 143-161. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.143 [10] W. Layton, R. Lewandowski. On a well-posed turbulence model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 111-128. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.111 [11] Yifei Lou, Sung Ha Kang, Stefano Soatto, Andrea L. Bertozzi. Video stabilization of atmospheric turbulence distortion. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (3) : 839-861. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.839 [12] Manuel Núñez. Existence of solutions of the equations of electron magnetohydrodynamics in a bounded domain. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (3) : 1019-1034. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1019 [13] Haiyan Yin. The stability of contact discontinuity for compressible planar magnetohydrodynamics. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (4) : 1235-1253. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017047 [14] Manuel Núñez. The long-time evolution of mean field magnetohydrodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (2) : 465-478. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.465 [15] Jae-Myoung  Kim. Local regularity of the magnetohydrodynamics equations near the curved boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (2) : 507-517. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.507 [16] Daniel Karrasch, Mohammad Farazmand, George Haller. Attraction-based computation of hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (1) : 83-93. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015.2.83 [17] Andreas Denner, Oliver Junge, Daniel Matthes. Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008 [18] William F. Thompson, Rachel Kuske, Yue-Xian Li. Stochastic phase dynamics of noise driven synchronization of two conditional coherent oscillators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (8) : 2971-2995. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2971 [19] Michael Dellnitz, Christian Horenkamp. The efficient approximation of coherent pairs in non-autonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (9) : 3029-3042. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3029 [20] Josselin Garnier, Knut Sølna. Enhanced Backscattering of a partially coherent field from an anisotropic random lossy medium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020158

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27