American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
January  2006, 6(1): 111-128. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.111

On a well-posed turbulence model

W. Layton 1, and  R. Lewandowski 2,

1. 

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Mathematics, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
2. 

Université Rennes 1, IRMAR, UMR CNRS 6625, F-35000 Rennes, France

Received  August 2004 Revised  August 2005 Published  October 2005

This report considers mathematical properties, important for practical computations, of a model for the simulation of the motion of large eddies in a turbulent flow. In this model, closure is accomplished in the very simple way:

$\overline{u u} $˜ $\overline{\bar {u} \bar {u}}$, yielding the model
$\nabla \cdot w= 0, \quad w_{t} + \nabla \cdot (\overline{w w}) - \nu \Delta w + \nabla q = \bar {f}$.

In particular, we prove existence and uniqueness of strong solutions, develop the regularity of solutions of the model and give a rigorous bound on the modelling error, $||\bar {u} - w||$. Finally, we consider the question of non-physical vortices (false eddies), proving that the model correctly predicts that only a small amount of vorticity results when the total turning forces on the flow are small.

Keywords: large eddy simulation., turbulence.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 76F65; Secondary: 35Q3.
Citation: W. Layton, R. Lewandowski. On a well-posed turbulence model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 111-128. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.111
[1]

Marcel Lesieur. Two-point closure based large-eddy simulations in turbulence, Part 1: Isotropic turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (1) : 155-168. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.155
[2]

Marcel Lesieur. Two-point closure based large-eddy simulations in turbulence. Part 2: Inhomogeneous cases. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (1) : 227-241. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.227
[3]

John V. Shebalin. Theory and simulation of real and ideal magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (1) : 153-174. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.153
[4]

François Baccelli, Augustin Chaintreau, Danny De Vleeschauwer, David R. McDonald. HTTP turbulence. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (1) : 1-40. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.1
[5]

Eric Falcon. Laboratory experiments on wave turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (4) : 819-840. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.819
[6]

Fredi Tröltzsch, Alberto Valli. Optimal voltage control of non-stationary eddy current problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 35-56. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018002
[7]

Yifei Lou, Sung Ha Kang, Stefano Soatto, Andrea L. Bertozzi. Video stabilization of atmospheric turbulence distortion. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (3) : 839-861. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.839
[8]

Alexandre Boritchev. Decaying turbulence for the fractional subcritical Burgers equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (5) : 2229-2249. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018092
[9]

Ka Kit Tung, Wendell Welch Orlando. On the differences between 2D and QG turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (2) : 145-162. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.145
[10]

Alexey Cheskidov, Susan Friedlander, Nataša Pavlović. An inviscid dyadic model of turbulence: The global attractor. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (3) : 781-794. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.781
[11]

Nusret Balci, Ciprian Foias, M. S Jolly, Ricardo Rosa. On universal relations in 2-D turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 27 (4) : 1327-1351. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1327
[12]

Chjan C. Lim, Ka Kit Tung. Introduction: Recent advances in vortex dynamics and turbulence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (1) : i-i. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.1i
[13]

Björn Birnir. The Kolmogorov-Obukhov-She-Leveque scaling in turbulence. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (5) : 1737-1757. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1737
[14]

Peter R. Kramer, Joseph A. Biello, Yuri Lvov. Application of weak turbulence theory to FPU model. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 482-491. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.482
[15]

Cristina Anton, Jian Deng, Yau Shu Wong, Yile Zhang, Weiping Zhang, Stephan Gabos, Dorothy Yu Huang, Can Jin. Modeling and simulation for toxicity assessment. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (3) : 581-606. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017034
[16]

Gong Chen, Peter J. Olver. Numerical simulation of nonlinear dispersive quantization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (3) : 991-1008. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.991
[17]

Ingenuin Gasser, Marcus Kraft. Modelling and simulation of fires in tunnel networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (4) : 691-707. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.691
[18]

Nicolas Vauchelet. Numerical simulation of a kinetic model for chemotaxis. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (3) : 501-528. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.501
[19]

Petr Bauer, Michal Beneš, Radek Fučík, Hung Hoang Dieu, Vladimír Klement, Radek Máca, Jan Mach, Tomáš Oberhuber, Pavel Strachota, Vítězslav Žabka, Vladimír Havlena. Numerical simulation of flow in fluidized beds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (5) : 833-846. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.833
[20]

Ingenuin Gasser. Modelling and simulation of a solar updraft tower. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 191-204. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.191

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (36)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (16)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences