American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  2007, 8(1): 127-143. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.127

The dynamics of bacterial infection, innate immune response, and antibiotic treatment

Mudassar Imran 1, and  Hal L. Smith 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, United States
2. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, United States

Received  October 2006 Revised  November 2006 Published  April 2007

We develop a simple mathematical model of a bacterial colonization of host tissue which takes account of nutrient availability and innate immune response. The model features an infection-free state which is locally but not globally attracting implying that a super-threshold bacterial inoculum is required for successful colonization and tissue infection. A subset $B$ of the domain of attraction of the disease-free state is explicitly identified. The dynamics of antibiotic treatment of the infection is also considered. Successful treatment results if the antibiotic dosing regime drives the state of the system into $B$.
Keywords: infection., Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antibiotic treatment.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92C50,92C45 ; Secondary: 34C9.
Citation: Mudassar Imran, Hal L. Smith. The dynamics of bacterial infection, innate immune response, and antibiotic treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (1) : 127-143. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.127
[1]

Mudassar Imran, Hal L. Smith. A model of optimal dosing of antibiotic treatment in biofilm. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (3) : 547-571. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.547
[2]

Maciej Leszczyński, Urszula Ledzewicz, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for a mathematical model for anti-angiogenic treatment with Michaelis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2315-2334. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019097
[3]

Liming Cai, Maia Martcheva, Xue-Zhi Li. Epidemic models with age of infection, indirect transmission and incomplete treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (9) : 2239-2265. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2239
[4]

Rebeccah E. Marsh, Jack A. Tuszyński, Michael Sawyer, Kenneth J. E. Vos. A model of competing saturable kinetic processes with application to the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer drug paclitaxel. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 325-354. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.325
[5]

Michele L. Joyner, Cammey C. Manning, Whitney Forbes, Michelle Maiden, Ariel N. Nikas. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for the antibiotic ertapenem. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (1) : 119-133. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016.13.119
[6]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity with Michealis-Menten pharmacodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2383-2405. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019100
[7]

Michele L. Joyner, Cammey C. Manning, Brandi N. Canter. Modeling the effects of introducing a new antibiotic in a hospital setting: A case study. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (3) : 601-625. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.601
[8]

Kaifa Wang, Aijun Fan. Uniform persistence and periodic solution of chemostat-type model with antibiotic. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (3) : 789-795. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.789
[9]

Robert E. Beardmore, Rafael Peña-Miller. Rotating antibiotics selects optimally against antibiotic resistance, in theory. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (3) : 527-552. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.527
[10]

Colette Calmelet, John Hotchkiss, Philip Crooke. A mathematical model for antibiotic control of bacteria in peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (6) : 1449-1464. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1449
[11]

Christoph Sadée, Eugene Kashdan. A model of thermotherapy treatment for bladder cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1169-1183. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016037
[12]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov, Andrei Korobeinikov. An optimal control problem in HIV treatment. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 311-322. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.311
[13]

Robert E. Beardmore, Rafael Peña-Miller. Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematical models to definitively quantify their relative merits. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (4) : 923-933. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.923
[14]

Elena Fimmel, Yury S. Semenov, Alexander S. Bratus. On optimal and suboptimal treatment strategies for a mathematical model of leukemia. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (1) : 151-165. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.151
[15]

Helen Moore, Weiqing Gu. A mathematical model for treatment-resistant mutations of HIV. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (2) : 363-380. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.363
[16]

Marek Bodnar, Monika Joanna Piotrowska, Urszula Foryś. Gompertz model with delays and treatment: Mathematical analysis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 551-563. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.551
[17]

Nara Bobko, Jorge P. Zubelli. A singularly perturbed HIV model with treatment and antigenic variation. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (1) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1
[18]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. Chattering and its approximation in control of psoriasis treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2251-2280. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019094
[19]

Tao Feng, Zhipeng Qiu. Global analysis of a stochastic TB model with vaccination and treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (6) : 2923-2939. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018292
[20]

Anna Ochal, Michal Jureczka. Numerical treatment of contact problems with thermal effect. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 387-400. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018027

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (75)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (12)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences