American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2008, 10(2&3, September): 401-419. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.401

Dynamical systems modeling of low-frequency variability in low-order atmospheric models

H. W. Broer 1, and  Renato Vitolo 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
2. 

College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, EX4 4QF, Exeter, United Kingdom

Received  October 2006 Revised  May 2007 Published  June 2008

The understanding of atmospheric and oceanic low-frequency variability is an old problem having both theoretical interest and practical importance, e.g., for the assessment of climate change. In this paper possible relations with dynamical systems theory are given, in particular through bifurcation theory. Firstly, a specific type of oceanic low frequency variability is described, the so-called Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). Then recent work is reviewed, that investigates bifurcations as these occur in a few low-order models of the atmospheric circulation. It is shown that the Shil′nikov bifurcation in the Hopf-saddle-node bifurcation scenario takes place in each of the above atmospheric models. Related strange attractors and intermittency behavior are also found, both in agreement with the theoretical expectations and with qualitative aspects of the climate variability, like the AMO. It is discussed how the latter connection may be consolidated in higher dimensional and in PDE models.
Keywords: intermittency, atmospheric dynamics, low-dimensional models., Shil$'$nikov bifurcation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37G35, 70K44; Secondary: 37D45, 85A2.
Citation: H. W. Broer, Renato Vitolo. Dynamical systems modeling of low-frequency variability in low-order atmospheric models. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (2&3, September) : 401-419. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.401
[1]

Mickaël D. Chekroun, Michael Ghil, Honghu Liu, Shouhong Wang. Low-dimensional Galerkin approximations of nonlinear delay differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (8) : 4133-4177. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4133
[2]

F.J. Herranz, J. de Lucas, C. Sardón. Jacobi--Lie systems: Fundamentals and low-dimensional classification. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 605-614. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0605
[3]

Chui-Jie Wu. Large optimal truncated low-dimensional dynamical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (4) : 559-583. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.559
[4]

Dmitrii Rachinskii. Realization of arbitrary hysteresis by a low-dimensional gradient flow. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (1) : 227-243. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.227
[5]

Andrey Sarychev. Controllability of the cubic Schroedinger equation via a low-dimensional source term. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2012, 2 (3) : 247-270. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.247
[6]

Chui-Jie Wu, Hongliang Zhao. Generalized HWD-POD method and coupling low-dimensional dynamical system of turbulence. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 371-379. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.371
[7]

Jing Zhou, Zhibin Deng. A low-dimensional SDP relaxation based spatial branch and bound method for nonconvex quadratic programs. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (5) : 2087-2102. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019044
[8]

Andrey Sarychev. Errata: Controllability of the cubic Schroedinger equation via a low-dimensional source term. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2014, 4 (2) : 261-261. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2014.4.261
[9]

Heikki Haario, Leonid Kalachev, Marko Laine. Reduction and identification of dynamic models. Simple example: Generic receptor model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (2) : 417-435. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.417
[10]

David Julitz. Numerical approximation of atmospheric-ocean models with subdivision algorithm. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 18 (2&3) : 429-447. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.18.429
[11]

Brittan Farmer, Cassandra Hall, Selim Esedoḡlu. Source identification from line integral measurements and simple atmospheric models. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2013, 7 (2) : 471-490. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.471
[12]

Julián López-Gómez, Marcela Molina-Meyer, Andrea Tellini. Intricate bifurcation diagrams for a class of one-dimensional superlinear indefinite problems of interest in population dynamics. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 515-524. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.515
[13]

Anatoly N. Kochubei, Yuri Kondratiev. Fractional kinetic hierarchies and intermittency. Kinetic and Related Models, 2017, 10 (3) : 725-740. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017029
[14]

Zhouchen Lin. A review on low-rank models in data analysis. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2016, 1 (2&3) : 139-161. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016001
[15]

Qixuan Wang, Hans G. Othmer. The performance of discrete models of low reynolds number swimmers. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1303-1320. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1303
[16]

Linda J. S. Allen, P. van den Driessche. Stochastic epidemic models with a backward bifurcation. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (3) : 445-458. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.445
[17]

Wenxiang Cong, Ge Wang, Qingsong Yang, Jia Li, Jiang Hsieh, Rongjie Lai. CT image reconstruction on a low dimensional manifold. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2019, 13 (3) : 449-460. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019022
[18]

James Walsh, Esther Widiasih. A dynamics approach to a low-order climate model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 257-279. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.257
[19]

Dan Liu, Shigui Ruan, Deming Zhu. Bifurcation analysis in models of tumor and immune system interactions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (1) : 151-168. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.151
[20]

Jintai Ding, Joshua Deaton, Kurt Schmidt. Giophantus distinguishing attack is a low dimensional learning with errors problem. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2020, 14 (4) : 573-577. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020030

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (43)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (8)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy