March  2009, 11(2): 283-314. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.283

Boundary velocity suboptimal control of incompressible flow in cylindrically perforated domain

1. 

Università di Salerno, DIIMA, Via Ponte don Melillo, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy

2. 

Dipartimento di Matematica e Applicazioni, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, DMA “R. Caccioppoli”, Complesso Monte S. Angelo, via Cintia, 80126 Napoli

3. 

Dnipropetrovsk National University, Department of Differential Equations, Kozakov str., 18/14, 49050 Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Received  October 2007 Revised  March 2008 Published  December 2008

In this paper we study an optimal boundary control problem for the 3D steady-state Navier-Stokes equation in a cylindrically perforated domain $\Omega_{\epsilon}$. The control is the boundary velocity field supported on the 'vertical' sides of thin cylinders. We minimize the vorticity of viscous flow through thick perforated domain. We show that an optimal solution to some limit problem in a non-perforated domain can be used as basis for the construction of suboptimal controls for the original control problem. It is worth noticing that the limit problem may take the form of either a variational calculation problem or an optimal control problem for Brinkman's law with another cost functional, depending on the cross-size of thin cylinders.
Citation: Ciro D’Apice, Umberto De Maio, Peter I. Kogut. Boundary velocity suboptimal control of incompressible flow in cylindrically perforated domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (2) : 283-314. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.283
[1]

Mehdi Badra. Abstract settings for stabilization of nonlinear parabolic system with a Riccati-based strategy. Application to Navier-Stokes and Boussinesq equations with Neumann or Dirichlet control. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (4) : 1169-1208. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1169

[2]

Pavel I. Plotnikov, Jan Sokolowski. Optimal shape control of airfoil in compressible gas flow governed by Navier-Stokes equations. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2013, 2 (3) : 495-516. doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.495

[3]

Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2022, 11 (2) : 347-371. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110

[4]

Huaiqiang Yu, Bin Liu. Pontryagin's principle for local solutions of optimal control governed by the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with mixed control-state constraints. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2012, 2 (1) : 61-80. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.61

[5]

Anna Amirdjanova, Jie Xiong. Large deviation principle for a stochastic navier-Stokes equation in its vorticity form for a two-dimensional incompressible flow. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (4) : 651-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.651

[6]

Enrique Fernández-Cara. Motivation, analysis and control of the variable density Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2012, 5 (6) : 1021-1090. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.1021

[7]

Hugo Beirão da Veiga. Navier-Stokes equations: Some questions related to the direction of the vorticity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (2) : 203-213. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019014

[8]

Hang-Chin Lai, Jin-Chirng Lee, Shuh-Jye Chern. A variational problem and optimal control. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 967-975. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.967

[9]

Boris Haspot, Ewelina Zatorska. From the highly compressible Navier-Stokes equations to the porous medium equation -- rate of convergence. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (6) : 3107-3123. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.3107

[10]

A. V. Fursikov. Stabilization for the 3D Navier-Stokes system by feedback boundary control. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2004, 10 (1&2) : 289-314. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.289

[11]

Kuijie Li, Tohru Ozawa, Baoxiang Wang. Dynamical behavior for the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (4) : 1511-1560. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018073

[12]

C. Foias, M. S Jolly, I. Kukavica, E. S. Titi. The Lorenz equation as a metaphor for the Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (2) : 403-429. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403

[13]

Maxim A. Olshanskii, Leo G. Rebholz, Abner J. Salgado. On well-posedness of a velocity-vorticity formulation of the stationary Navier-Stokes equations with no-slip boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (7) : 3459-3477. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018148

[14]

Guangrong Wu, Ping Zhang. The zero diffusion limit of 2-D Navier-Stokes equations with $L^1$ initial vorticity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (3) : 631-638. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.631

[15]

Matthew Gardner, Adam Larios, Leo G. Rebholz, Duygu Vargun, Camille Zerfas. Continuous data assimilation applied to a velocity-vorticity formulation of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (3) : 2223-2247. doi: 10.3934/era.2020113

[16]

G. M. de Araújo, S. B. de Menezes. On a variational inequality for the Navier-Stokes operator with variable viscosity. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (3) : 583-596. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.583

[17]

Roberta Bianchini, Roberto Natalini. Convergence of a vector-BGK approximation for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2019, 12 (1) : 133-158. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019006

[18]

Zhilei Liang. Convergence rate of solutions to the contact discontinuity for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (5) : 1907-1926. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1907

[19]

Mirela Kohr, Sergey E. Mikhailov, Wolfgang L. Wendland. Dirichlet and transmission problems for anisotropic stokes and Navier-Stokes systems with L tensor coefficient under relaxed ellipticity condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (9) : 4421-4460. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021042

[20]

Roberto Triggiani, Xiang Wan. From low to high-and lower-optimal regularity of the SMGTJ equation with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary control, and with point control, via explicit representation formulae. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2022  doi: 10.3934/eect.2022007

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (45)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]