
Previous Article
Regular flows of weakly compressible viscoelastic fluids and the incompressible limit
 DCDSB Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Period increment cascades in a discontinuous map with squareroot singularity
On the high order approximation of the centre manifold for ODEs
1.  Universitat de Barcelona, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 585, Barcelona, 08007, Spain, Spain 
Here we focus on equilibrium points whose linear dynamics is a cross product of one hyperbolic directions and several elliptic ones. We will compute a high order approximation of the centre manifold around the equilibrium point and use it to describe the behaviour of the system in an extended neighbourhood of this point. Our approach is based on the graph transform method. To derive an efficient algorithm we use recurrent expressions for the expansion of the non  linear terms on the equations of motion.
Although this method does not require the system to be Hamiltonian, we have taken a Hamiltonian system as an example. We have compared its efficiency with a more classical approach for this type of systems, the Lie series method. It turns out that in this example the graph transform method is more efficient than the Lie series method. Finally, we have used this high order approximation of the centre manifold to describe the bounded motion of the system around and unstable equilibrium point.
[1] 
Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133 
[2] 
Maciej J. Capiński, Piotr Zgliczyński. Cone conditions and covering relations for topologically normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (3) : 641670. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.641 
[3] 
Amadeu Delshams, Marian Gidea, Pablo Roldán. Transition map and shadowing lemma for normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (3) : 10891112. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1089 
[4] 
Inmaculada Baldomá, Ernest Fontich, Pau Martín. Gevrey estimates for one dimensional parabolic invariant manifolds of nonhyperbolic fixed points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 41594190. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017177 
[5] 
Rovella Alvaro, Vilamajó Francesc, Romero Neptalí. Invariant manifolds for delay endomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 3550. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.35 
[6] 
Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233 
[7] 
Zhihong Xia. Hyperbolic invariant sets with positive measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (3) : 811818. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.811 
[8] 
Brent Everitt, John Ratcliffe and Steven Tschantz. The smallest hyperbolic 6manifolds. Electronic Research Announcements, 2005, 11: 4046. 
[9] 
José F. Alves, Davide Azevedo. Statistical properties of diffeomorphisms with weak invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (1) : 141. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1 
[10] 
George Osipenko. Indestructibility of invariant locally nonunique manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (2) : 203219. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.203 
[11] 
Christopher K. R. T. Jones, SiuKei Tin. Generalized exchange lemmas and orbits heteroclinic to invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2009, 2 (4) : 9671023. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.967 
[12] 
Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (2) : 579596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579 
[13] 
Arturo EcheverríaEnríquez, Alberto Ibort, Miguel C. MuñozLecanda, Narciso RománRoy. Invariant forms and automorphisms of locally homogeneous multisymplectic manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (4) : 397419. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.397 
[14] 
Roberto Castelli. Efficient representation of invariant manifolds of periodic orbits in the CRTBP. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2019, 24 (2) : 563586. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018197 
[15] 
Pablo Aguirre, Bernd Krauskopf, Hinke M. Osinga. Global invariant manifolds near a Shilnikov homoclinic bifurcation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 138. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.1 
[16] 
Clara CufíCabré, Ernest Fontich. Differentiable invariant manifolds of nilpotent parabolic points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (10) : 46674704. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021053 
[17] 
Alexey Gorshkov. Stable invariant manifolds with application to control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021040 
[18] 
Fuzhong Cong, Yong Li. Invariant hyperbolic tori for Hamiltonian systems with degeneracy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1997, 3 (3) : 371382. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.371 
[19] 
Francois Ledrappier and Omri Sarig. Invariant measures for the horocycle flow on periodic hyperbolic surfaces. Electronic Research Announcements, 2005, 11: 8994. 
[20] 
Lennard F. Bakker, Pedro Martins Rodrigues. A profinite group invariant for hyperbolic toral automorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (6) : 19651976. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1965 
2020 Impact Factor: 1.327
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]