American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2012, 17(4): 1229-1259. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1229

Jet schemes for advection problems

Benjamin Seibold 1, , Rodolfo R. Rosales 2, and  Jean-Christophe Nave 3,

1. 

Temple University, Department of Mathematics, 1805 North Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19122
2. 

Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
3. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke W., Montreal, QC, H3A 2K6, Canada

Received  January 2011 Revised  November 2011 Published  February 2012

We present a systematic methodology to develop high order accurate numerical approaches for linear advection problems. These methods are based on evolving parts of the jet of the solution in time, and are thus called jet schemes. Through the tracking of characteristics and the use of suitable Hermite interpolations, high order is achieved in an optimally local fashion, i.e. the update for the data at any grid point uses information from a single grid cell only. We show that jet schemes can be interpreted as advect-and-project processes in function spaces, where the projection step minimizes a stability functional. Furthermore, this function space framework makes it possible to systematically inherit update rules for the higher derivatives from the ODE solver for the characteristics. Jet schemes of orders up to five are applied in numerical benchmark tests, and systematically compared with classical WENO finite difference schemes. It is observed that jet schemes tend to possess a higher accuracy than WENO schemes of the same order.
Keywords: advection, high-order, gradient-augmented, quintic, cubic, Jet schemes, superconsistency..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65M25, 65M12; Secondary: 35L0.
Citation: Benjamin Seibold, Rodolfo R. Rosales, Jean-Christophe Nave. Jet schemes for advection problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (4) : 1229-1259. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1229
References:
[1]

D. Adalsteinsson and J. A. Sethian, The fast construction of extension velocities in level set methods,, J. Comput. Phys., 148 (1999), 2.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6090.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. V. Arutyunov, "Optimality Conditions: Abnormal and Degenerate Problems,", Mathematics and its Applications, 526 (2000).   Google Scholar

[3]

J. B. Bell, P. Colella and H. Glaz, A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,, J. Comput. Phys., 85 (1989), 257.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90151-4.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. J. Berger and J. Oliger, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations,, J. Comput. Phys., 53 (1984), 484.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90073-1.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. R. Cash and A. H. Karp, A variable order Runge-Kutta method for initial value problems with rapidly varying right-hand sides,, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 16 (1990), 201.  doi: 10.1145/79505.79507.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Chidyagwai, J.-C. Nave, R. R. Rosales and B. Seibold, A comparative study of the efficiency of jet schemes,, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model.-B, (2011).   Google Scholar

[7]

B. Cockburn and C.-W. Shu, The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection-diffusion systems,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), 2440.  doi: 10.1137/S0036142997316712.  Google Scholar

[8]

R. Courant, E. Isaacson and M. Rees, On the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations by finite differences,, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 5 (1952), 243.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160050303.  Google Scholar

[9]

S. Gottlieb, On high order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multi step time discretizations,, J. Sci. Comput., 25 (2005), 105.   Google Scholar

[10]

S. Gottlieb, D. I. Ketcheson and C.-W. Shu, High order strong stability preserving time discretizations,, Journ. Sci. Computing, 38 (2009), 251.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z.  Google Scholar

[11]

S. Gottlieb and C.-W. Shu, Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes,, Math. Comp., 67 (1998), 73.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00913-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu and E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods,, SIAM Rev., 43 (2001), 89.  doi: 10.1137/S003614450036757X.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. P. Heller, An unmixing demonstration,, Am. J. Phys., 28 (1960), 348.  doi: 10.1119/1.1935802.  Google Scholar

[14]

W. Hesthaven and T. Warburton, "Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applicationss," Texts in Applied Mathematics, 54,, Springer, (2008).   Google Scholar

[15]

G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 126 (): 202.   Google Scholar

[16]

M. L. Kontsevich, Lecture at Orsay,, December, (1995).   Google Scholar

[17]

R. LeVeque, High-resolution conservative algorithms for advection in incompressible flow,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 627.  doi: 10.1137/0733033.  Google Scholar

[18]

X.-D. Liu, S. Osher and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 115 (1994), 200.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1187.  Google Scholar

[19]

C.-H. Min and F. Gibou, A second order accurate level set method on non-graded adaptive cartesian grids,, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 300.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.11.034.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. F. Nash, Jr., Arc structure of singularities,, Duke Math. J., 81 (1995), 31.  doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-95-08103-4.  Google Scholar

[21]

J.-C. Nave, R. R. Rosales and B. Seibold, A gradient-augmented level set method with an optimally local, coherent advection scheme,, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 3802.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.01.029.  Google Scholar

[22]

S. Osher and J. A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations,, J. Comput. Phys., 79 (1988), 12.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2.  Google Scholar

[23]

W. H. Reed and T. R. Hill, Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation,, Technical Report LA-UR-73-479, (1973), 73.   Google Scholar

[24]

C.-W. Shu, Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations,, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 9 (1988), 1073.  doi: 10.1137/0909073.  Google Scholar

[25]

C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 77 (1988), 439.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Sussman, P. Smereka and S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow,, J. Comput. Phys., 114 (1994), 146.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1155.  Google Scholar

[27]

G. I. Taylor, "Low Reynolds Number Flow,", Movie, (1961).   Google Scholar

[28]

B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monoticity,, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics, 18 (1973), 163.  doi: 10.1007/BFb0118673.  Google Scholar

[29]

B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method,, J. Comput. Phys., 32 (1979), 101.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

D. Adalsteinsson and J. A. Sethian, The fast construction of extension velocities in level set methods,, J. Comput. Phys., 148 (1999), 2.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6090.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. V. Arutyunov, "Optimality Conditions: Abnormal and Degenerate Problems,", Mathematics and its Applications, 526 (2000).   Google Scholar

[3]

J. B. Bell, P. Colella and H. Glaz, A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,, J. Comput. Phys., 85 (1989), 257.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90151-4.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. J. Berger and J. Oliger, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations,, J. Comput. Phys., 53 (1984), 484.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90073-1.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. R. Cash and A. H. Karp, A variable order Runge-Kutta method for initial value problems with rapidly varying right-hand sides,, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 16 (1990), 201.  doi: 10.1145/79505.79507.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Chidyagwai, J.-C. Nave, R. R. Rosales and B. Seibold, A comparative study of the efficiency of jet schemes,, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model.-B, (2011).   Google Scholar

[7]

B. Cockburn and C.-W. Shu, The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection-diffusion systems,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), 2440.  doi: 10.1137/S0036142997316712.  Google Scholar

[8]

R. Courant, E. Isaacson and M. Rees, On the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations by finite differences,, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 5 (1952), 243.  doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160050303.  Google Scholar

[9]

S. Gottlieb, On high order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multi step time discretizations,, J. Sci. Comput., 25 (2005), 105.   Google Scholar

[10]

S. Gottlieb, D. I. Ketcheson and C.-W. Shu, High order strong stability preserving time discretizations,, Journ. Sci. Computing, 38 (2009), 251.  doi: 10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z.  Google Scholar

[11]

S. Gottlieb and C.-W. Shu, Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes,, Math. Comp., 67 (1998), 73.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00913-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu and E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods,, SIAM Rev., 43 (2001), 89.  doi: 10.1137/S003614450036757X.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. P. Heller, An unmixing demonstration,, Am. J. Phys., 28 (1960), 348.  doi: 10.1119/1.1935802.  Google Scholar

[14]

W. Hesthaven and T. Warburton, "Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applicationss," Texts in Applied Mathematics, 54,, Springer, (2008).   Google Scholar

[15]

G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 126 (): 202.   Google Scholar

[16]

M. L. Kontsevich, Lecture at Orsay,, December, (1995).   Google Scholar

[17]

R. LeVeque, High-resolution conservative algorithms for advection in incompressible flow,, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), 627.  doi: 10.1137/0733033.  Google Scholar

[18]

X.-D. Liu, S. Osher and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 115 (1994), 200.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1187.  Google Scholar

[19]

C.-H. Min and F. Gibou, A second order accurate level set method on non-graded adaptive cartesian grids,, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 300.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.11.034.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. F. Nash, Jr., Arc structure of singularities,, Duke Math. J., 81 (1995), 31.  doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-95-08103-4.  Google Scholar

[21]

J.-C. Nave, R. R. Rosales and B. Seibold, A gradient-augmented level set method with an optimally local, coherent advection scheme,, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 3802.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.01.029.  Google Scholar

[22]

S. Osher and J. A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations,, J. Comput. Phys., 79 (1988), 12.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2.  Google Scholar

[23]

W. H. Reed and T. R. Hill, Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation,, Technical Report LA-UR-73-479, (1973), 73.   Google Scholar

[24]

C.-W. Shu, Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations,, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 9 (1988), 1073.  doi: 10.1137/0909073.  Google Scholar

[25]

C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes,, J. Comput. Phys., 77 (1988), 439.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Sussman, P. Smereka and S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow,, J. Comput. Phys., 114 (1994), 146.  doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1155.  Google Scholar

[27]

G. I. Taylor, "Low Reynolds Number Flow,", Movie, (1961).   Google Scholar

[28]

B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monoticity,, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics, 18 (1973), 163.  doi: 10.1007/BFb0118673.  Google Scholar

[29]

B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method,, J. Comput. Phys., 32 (1979), 101.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1.  Google Scholar

[1]

Marc Wolff, Stéphane Jaouen, Hervé Jourdren, Eric Sonnendrücker. High-order dimensionally split Lagrange-remap schemes for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2012, 5 (2) : 345-367. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.345
[2]

Kai Jiang, Wei Si. High-order energy stable schemes of incommensurate phase-field crystal model. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 1077-1093. doi: 10.3934/era.2020059
[3]

Zheng Sun, José A. Carrillo, Chi-Wang Shu. An entropy stable high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for cross-diffusion gradient flow systems. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (4) : 885-908. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019033
[4]

Lela Dorel. Glucose level regulation via integral high-order sliding modes. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 549-560. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.549
[5]

Amy Allwright, Abdon Atangana. Augmented upwind numerical schemes for a fractional advection-dispersion equation in fractured groundwater systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 443-466. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020025
[6]

Guoshan Zhang, Peizhao Yu. Lyapunov method for stability of descriptor second-order and high-order systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 673-686. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017068
[7]

Yuezheng Gong, Jiaquan Gao, Yushun Wang. High order Gauss-Seidel schemes for charged particle dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (2) : 573-585. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018034
[8]

Abdelwahab Bensouilah, Sahbi Keraani. Smoothing property for the $ L^2 $-critical high-order NLS Ⅱ. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (5) : 2961-2976. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019123
[9]

Kolade M. Owolabi, Abdon Atangana. High-order solvers for space-fractional differential equations with Riesz derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 567-590. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019037
[10]

Marc Bonnet. Inverse acoustic scattering using high-order small-inclusion expansion of misfit function. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (4) : 921-953. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018039
[11]

Raymond H. Chan, Haixia Liang, Suhua Wei, Mila Nikolova, Xue-Cheng Tai. High-order total variation regularization approach for axially symmetric object tomography from a single radiograph. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (1) : 55-77. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.55
[12]

Shan Jiang, Li Liang, Meiling Sun, Fang Su. Uniform high-order convergence of multiscale finite element computation on a graded recursion for singular perturbation. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 935-949. doi: 10.3934/era.2020049
[13]

Tarek Saanouni. Global well-posedness of some high-order semilinear wave and Schrödinger type equations with exponential nonlinearity. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (1) : 273-291. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.273
[14]

Phillip Colella. High-order finite-volume methods on locally-structured grids. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (8) : 4247-4270. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4247
[15]

Andrey B. Muravnik. On the Cauchy problem for differential-difference parabolic equations with high-order nonlocal terms of general kind. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (3) : 541-561. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.541
[16]

Anis Theljani, Ke Chen. An augmented lagrangian method for solving a new variational model based on gradients similarity measures and high order regulariation for multimodality registration. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (2) : 309-335. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019016
[17]

Ahmed El Kaimbillah, Oussama Bourihane, Bouazza Braikat, Mohammad Jamal, Foudil Mohri, Noureddine Damil. Efficient high-order implicit solvers for the dynamic of thin-walled beams with open cross section under external arbitrary loadings. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (6) : 1685-1708. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019113
[18]

Florian Schneider, Jochen Kall, Graham Alldredge. A realizability-preserving high-order kinetic scheme using WENO reconstruction for entropy-based moment closures of linear kinetic equations in slab geometry. Kinetic & Related Models, 2016, 9 (1) : 193-215. doi: 10.3934/krm.2016.9.193
[19]

Christopher Chong, Dmitry Pelinovsky. Variational approximations of bifurcations of asymmetric solitons in cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger lattices. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (5) : 1019-1031. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1019
[20]

Jaime Angulo Pava, César A. Hernández Melo. On stability properties of the Cubic-Quintic Schródinger equation with $\delta$-point interaction. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (4) : 2093-2116. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019094

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (45)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (15)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences