American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    On the uniqueness of weak solution for the 2-D Ericksen--Leslie system
  • DCDS-B Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Existence of multiple nontrivial solutions for a $p$-Kirchhoff type elliptic problem involving sign-changing weight functions
May  2016, 21(3): 909-918. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.909

Dynamics in a Rosenzweig-Macarthur predator-prey system with quiescence

Jinfeng Wang 1, and  Hongxia Fan 2,

1. 

School of Mathematical Sciences, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, China
2. 

Department of Basic Science, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001, China

Received  July 2015 Revised  September 2015 Published  January 2016

A system of four coupled ordinary differential equations is considered, which are coupled through migration of both prey and predator model with logistic type growth. Combined effect of quiescence provides a more realistic way of modeling the complex dynamical behavior. The global stability and Hopf bifurcation solutions are investigated.
Keywords: quiescence, Predator-prey, four coupled, stability, Hopf bifurcation..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34D20; Secondary: 37G1.
Citation: Jinfeng Wang, Hongxia Fan. Dynamics in a Rosenzweig-Macarthur predator-prey system with quiescence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 909-918. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.909
References:
[1]

L. Bilinsky and K. P. Hadeler, Quiescence stabiizes predator prey relations,, J. Biol. Dyna., 3 (2009), 196.  doi: 10.1080/17513750802590707.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. Capasso and K. Kunisch, A reaction-diffusion system arising in modelling manenvironment diseases,, Quart. Appl. Math., 46 (1988), 431.   Google Scholar

[3]

V. Capasso and R. E. Wilson, Analysis of a reaction-diffusion system modeling manenvironment-manepidemics,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 57 (1997), 327.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139995284681.  Google Scholar

[4]

K. S. Cheng, Uniqueness of a limit cycle for a predator-prey system,, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 12 (1981), 541.  doi: 10.1137/0512047.  Google Scholar

[5]

K. P. Hadeler, Quiescent phases and stability,, Linear Alge. Appl., 428 (2008), 1620.  doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2007.10.008.  Google Scholar

[6]

K. P. Hadeler and T. Hillen, Coupled dynamics and quiescent phases, math everywhere deterministic and stochastic modelling in biomedicine,, Economy and Industry, (2007), 7.  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-44446-6_2.  Google Scholar

[7]

K. P. Hadeler and M. A. Lewis, Spatial dynamics of the diffusive logistic equation with a sedentary compartment,, Canad. Appl. Math. Quart., 10 (2002), 473.   Google Scholar

[8]

T. Hillen, Transport equations with resting phases,, European J. Appl. Math., 14 (2003), 613.  doi: 10.1017/S0956792503005291.  Google Scholar

[9]

S. B. Hsu, On global stability of a predator-prey system,, Math. Biosci., 39 (1978), 1.  doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90025-1.  Google Scholar

[10]

S. B. Hsu, A survey of constructing lyapunov functions for mathematical models in population biology,, Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 9 (2005), 151.   Google Scholar

[11]

S. B. Hsu and J. P. Shi, Relaxation oscillator profile of limit cycle in predator-prey system,, Discrete Continuous Dynam. Systems - B, 11 (2009), 893.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.893.  Google Scholar

[12]

W. Jager, S. Kroker and B. Tang, Quiescence and transient growth dynamics in chemostat models,, Math. Biosci., 119 (1994), 225.  doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(94)90077-9.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. A. Lewis and G. Schmitz, Biological invasion of an organism with separate mobile and stationary states: modeling and analysis,, Forma, 11 (1996), 1.   Google Scholar

[14]

M. G. Neubert, P. Klepac and P. Driessche, Stabilizing dispersal delays in predator-prey metapopulation models,, Theor. Popul. Biol., 61 (2002), 339.  doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1578.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. Malik and H. L. Smith, A resource-based model of microbial quiescence,, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 231.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0003-4.  Google Scholar

[16]

D. H. Robert, Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interaction and the coexistence of prey species,, The American Naturalist, 124 (1984), 377.   Google Scholar

[17]

M. L. Rosenzweig, Paradox of enrichment: Destablization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time,, Science, 171 (1971), 385.  doi: 10.1126/science.171.3969.385.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Wiggins, Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos,, Second edition. Texts in Applied Mathematics, (2003).  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4067-7.  Google Scholar

[19]

F. Q. Yi, J. J. Wei and J. P. Shi, Bifurcation and spatiotemporal patterns in a homogeneous diffusive predator-prey system,, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1944.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2008.10.024.  Google Scholar

[20]

K. F. Zhang and X. Q. Zhao, Asymptotic behaviour of a reaction-diffusion model with a quiescent stage,, Proc. R. Soc. A, 463 (2007), 1029.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.2006.1806.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. Bilinsky and K. P. Hadeler, Quiescence stabiizes predator prey relations,, J. Biol. Dyna., 3 (2009), 196.  doi: 10.1080/17513750802590707.  Google Scholar

[2]

V. Capasso and K. Kunisch, A reaction-diffusion system arising in modelling manenvironment diseases,, Quart. Appl. Math., 46 (1988), 431.   Google Scholar

[3]

V. Capasso and R. E. Wilson, Analysis of a reaction-diffusion system modeling manenvironment-manepidemics,, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 57 (1997), 327.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139995284681.  Google Scholar

[4]

K. S. Cheng, Uniqueness of a limit cycle for a predator-prey system,, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 12 (1981), 541.  doi: 10.1137/0512047.  Google Scholar

[5]

K. P. Hadeler, Quiescent phases and stability,, Linear Alge. Appl., 428 (2008), 1620.  doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2007.10.008.  Google Scholar

[6]

K. P. Hadeler and T. Hillen, Coupled dynamics and quiescent phases, math everywhere deterministic and stochastic modelling in biomedicine,, Economy and Industry, (2007), 7.  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-44446-6_2.  Google Scholar

[7]

K. P. Hadeler and M. A. Lewis, Spatial dynamics of the diffusive logistic equation with a sedentary compartment,, Canad. Appl. Math. Quart., 10 (2002), 473.   Google Scholar

[8]

T. Hillen, Transport equations with resting phases,, European J. Appl. Math., 14 (2003), 613.  doi: 10.1017/S0956792503005291.  Google Scholar

[9]

S. B. Hsu, On global stability of a predator-prey system,, Math. Biosci., 39 (1978), 1.  doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90025-1.  Google Scholar

[10]

S. B. Hsu, A survey of constructing lyapunov functions for mathematical models in population biology,, Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 9 (2005), 151.   Google Scholar

[11]

S. B. Hsu and J. P. Shi, Relaxation oscillator profile of limit cycle in predator-prey system,, Discrete Continuous Dynam. Systems - B, 11 (2009), 893.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.893.  Google Scholar

[12]

W. Jager, S. Kroker and B. Tang, Quiescence and transient growth dynamics in chemostat models,, Math. Biosci., 119 (1994), 225.  doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(94)90077-9.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. A. Lewis and G. Schmitz, Biological invasion of an organism with separate mobile and stationary states: modeling and analysis,, Forma, 11 (1996), 1.   Google Scholar

[14]

M. G. Neubert, P. Klepac and P. Driessche, Stabilizing dispersal delays in predator-prey metapopulation models,, Theor. Popul. Biol., 61 (2002), 339.  doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1578.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. Malik and H. L. Smith, A resource-based model of microbial quiescence,, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 231.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0003-4.  Google Scholar

[16]

D. H. Robert, Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interaction and the coexistence of prey species,, The American Naturalist, 124 (1984), 377.   Google Scholar

[17]

M. L. Rosenzweig, Paradox of enrichment: Destablization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time,, Science, 171 (1971), 385.  doi: 10.1126/science.171.3969.385.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Wiggins, Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos,, Second edition. Texts in Applied Mathematics, (2003).  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4067-7.  Google Scholar

[19]

F. Q. Yi, J. J. Wei and J. P. Shi, Bifurcation and spatiotemporal patterns in a homogeneous diffusive predator-prey system,, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 1944.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2008.10.024.  Google Scholar

[20]

K. F. Zhang and X. Q. Zhao, Asymptotic behaviour of a reaction-diffusion model with a quiescent stage,, Proc. R. Soc. A, 463 (2007), 1029.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.2006.1806.  Google Scholar

[1]

Bernold Fiedler. Global Hopf bifurcation in networks with fast feedback cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 177-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020344
[2]

Fathalla A. Rihan, Hebatallah J. Alsakaji. Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020468
[3]

Susmita Sadhu. Complex oscillatory patterns near singular Hopf bifurcation in a two-timescale ecosystem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020342
[4]

Gervy Marie Angeles, Gilbert Peralta. Energy method for exponential stability of coupled one-dimensional hyperbolic PDE-ODE systems. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020108
[5]

Ilyasse Lamrani, Imad El Harraki, Ali Boutoulout, Fatima-Zahrae El Alaoui. Feedback stabilization of bilinear coupled hyperbolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020434
[6]

Eduard Feireisl, Elisabetta Rocca, Giulio Schimperna, Arghir Zarnescu. Weak sequential stability for a nonlinear model of nematic electrolytes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 219-241. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020366
[7]

Yichen Zhang, Meiqiang Feng. A coupled $ p $-Laplacian elliptic system: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1419-1438. doi: 10.3934/era.2020075
[8]

Maoding Zhen, Binlin Zhang, Vicenţiu D. Rădulescu. Normalized solutions for nonlinear coupled fractional systems: Low and high perturbations in the attractive case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020379
[9]

Xavier Carvajal, Liliana Esquivel, Raphael Santos. On local well-posedness and ill-posedness results for a coupled system of mkdv type equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020382
[10]

Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432
[11]

Scipio Cuccagna, Masaya Maeda. A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations II. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020450
[12]

Gloria Paoli, Gianpaolo Piscitelli, Rossanno Sannipoli. A stability result for the Steklov Laplacian Eigenvalue Problem with a spherical obstacle. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 145-158. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020261
[13]

Hao Wang. Uniform stability estimate for the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 657-680. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020292
[14]

Hongguang Ma, Xiang Li. Multi-period hazardous waste collection planning with consideration of risk stability. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 393-408. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019117
[15]

Xin-Guang Yang, Lu Li, Xingjie Yan, Ling Ding. The structure and stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1395-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2020074
[16]

A. M. Elaiw, N. H. AlShamrani, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta. Stability analysis of a general HIV dynamics model with multi-stages of infected cells and two routes of infection. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020441
[17]

Chao Xing, Jiaojiao Pan, Hong Luo. Stability and dynamic transition of a toxin-producing phytoplankton-zooplankton model with additional food. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 427-448. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020275

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (86)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences