American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
December  2016, 21(10): 3669-3708. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016116

On the upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for multi-valued noncompact random dynamical systems

Yejuan Wang 1,

1. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Gansu Key Laboratory of Applied Mathematics and Complex Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000

Received  November 2015 Revised  April 2016 Published  November 2016

In this paper, we first present some conditions for the upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for multi-valued noncompact random dynamical systems with small perturbations. Then we establish the upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for nonautonomous and stochastic reaction-diffusion delay equations defined on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with small time delay perturbation for which uniqueness of solutions need not hold. Finally, we prove the existence and upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for nonautonomous and stochastic nonclassical diffusion equations with polynomial growth nonlinearity of arbitrary order and without the uniqueness of solutions.
Keywords: reaction-diffusion equation with delay, upper semicontinuity., Multi-valued noncompact random dynamical system, pullback attractor, nonclassical diffusion equation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34K26, 35K57, 37L5.
Citation: Yejuan Wang. On the upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for multi-valued noncompact random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (10) : 3669-3708. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016116
References:
[1]

Ann. Polon. Math., 111 (2014), 271-295. doi: 10.4064/ap111-3-5.  Google Scholar

[2]

Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-12878-7.  Google Scholar

[3]

Birkhäuser, Bosten, Basel, Berlin, 1990.  Google Scholar

[4]

J. Differ. Equ., 246 (2009), 845-869. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2008.05.017.  Google Scholar

[5]

Set-Valued Anal., 11 (2003), 153-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1022902802385.  Google Scholar

[6]

Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. A Math. Anal., 10 (2003), 491-513.  Google Scholar

[7]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 21 (2008), 415-443. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.415.  Google Scholar

[8]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2010), 439-455. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.439.  Google Scholar

[9]

American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.  Google Scholar

[10]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. doi: 10.1007/b83277.  Google Scholar

[11]

Set-Valued Var. Anal., 21 (2013), 127-149. doi: 10.1007/s11228-012-0215-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), 1530-1561. doi: 10.1137/140978995.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. Dynam. Differ. Equ., 9 (1997), 307-341. doi: 10.1007/BF02219225.  Google Scholar

[14]

De Gruyter, Berlin, 1992. doi: 10.1515/9783110874228.  Google Scholar

[15]

Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. doi: 10.1214/aop/1068646380.  Google Scholar

[16]

Stoch. Stoch. Rep., 59 (1996), 21-45. doi: 10.1080/17442509608834083.  Google Scholar

[17]

J. Differ. Equ., 123 (1995), 56-92. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1995.1157.  Google Scholar

[18]

Abstr. Appl. Anal., 5 (2000), 33-46. doi: 10.1155/S1085337500000191.  Google Scholar

[19]

Systems Control Lett., 33 (1998), 275-280. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6911(97)00107-2.  Google Scholar

[20]

Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 73 (2006), 299-306. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700038880.  Google Scholar

[21]

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 463 (2007), 163-181. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2006.1753.  Google Scholar

[22]

Set-Valued Anal., 16 (2008), 651-671. doi: 10.1007/s11228-007-0054-8.  Google Scholar

[23]

Indiana Univ. Math. J., 51 (2002), 1541-1559. doi: 10.1512/iumj.2002.51.2255.  Google Scholar

[24]

Set-Valued Anal., 6 (1998), 83-111. doi: 10.1023/A:1008608431399.  Google Scholar

[25]

Set-Valued Anal., 8 (2000), 375-403. doi: 10.1023/A:1026514727329.  Google Scholar

[26]

J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 20 (2008), 133-164. doi: 10.1007/s10884-007-9089-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.  Google Scholar

[28]

Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 139 (2009), 1-18.  Google Scholar

[29]

J. Differ. Equ., 253 (2012), 1544-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.015.  Google Scholar

[30]

J. Math. Phys., 54 (2013), 082703, 25 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4817862.  Google Scholar

[31]

SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2015), 1018-1047. doi: 10.1137/140991819.  Google Scholar

[32]

J. Math. Phys., 51 (2010), 022701, 12 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.3277152.  Google Scholar

[33]

J. Differ. Equ., 232 (2007), 573-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.07.005.  Google Scholar

[34]

Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 71 (2013), 369-399. doi: 10.1090/S0033-569X-2013-01306-1.  Google Scholar

[35]

J. Differ. Equ., 259 (2015), 728-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.026.  Google Scholar

[36]

J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 24 (2012), 495-520. doi: 10.1007/s10884-012-9252-7.  Google Scholar

[37]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34 (2014), 301-333. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.301.  Google Scholar

[38]

J. Differ. Equ., 223 (2006), 367-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2005.06.008.  Google Scholar

[39]

Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 75 (2012), 485-502. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.08.050.  Google Scholar

[40]

Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 75 (2012), 2793-2805. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.11.022.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

Ann. Polon. Math., 111 (2014), 271-295. doi: 10.4064/ap111-3-5.  Google Scholar

[2]

Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-12878-7.  Google Scholar

[3]

Birkhäuser, Bosten, Basel, Berlin, 1990.  Google Scholar

[4]

J. Differ. Equ., 246 (2009), 845-869. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2008.05.017.  Google Scholar

[5]

Set-Valued Anal., 11 (2003), 153-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1022902802385.  Google Scholar

[6]

Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. A Math. Anal., 10 (2003), 491-513.  Google Scholar

[7]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 21 (2008), 415-443. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.415.  Google Scholar

[8]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2010), 439-455. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.439.  Google Scholar

[9]

American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.  Google Scholar

[10]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. doi: 10.1007/b83277.  Google Scholar

[11]

Set-Valued Var. Anal., 21 (2013), 127-149. doi: 10.1007/s11228-012-0215-2.  Google Scholar

[12]

SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), 1530-1561. doi: 10.1137/140978995.  Google Scholar

[13]

J. Dynam. Differ. Equ., 9 (1997), 307-341. doi: 10.1007/BF02219225.  Google Scholar

[14]

De Gruyter, Berlin, 1992. doi: 10.1515/9783110874228.  Google Scholar

[15]

Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 2109-2135. doi: 10.1214/aop/1068646380.  Google Scholar

[16]

Stoch. Stoch. Rep., 59 (1996), 21-45. doi: 10.1080/17442509608834083.  Google Scholar

[17]

J. Differ. Equ., 123 (1995), 56-92. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1995.1157.  Google Scholar

[18]

Abstr. Appl. Anal., 5 (2000), 33-46. doi: 10.1155/S1085337500000191.  Google Scholar

[19]

Systems Control Lett., 33 (1998), 275-280. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6911(97)00107-2.  Google Scholar

[20]

Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 73 (2006), 299-306. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700038880.  Google Scholar

[21]

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 463 (2007), 163-181. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2006.1753.  Google Scholar

[22]

Set-Valued Anal., 16 (2008), 651-671. doi: 10.1007/s11228-007-0054-8.  Google Scholar

[23]

Indiana Univ. Math. J., 51 (2002), 1541-1559. doi: 10.1512/iumj.2002.51.2255.  Google Scholar

[24]

Set-Valued Anal., 6 (1998), 83-111. doi: 10.1023/A:1008608431399.  Google Scholar

[25]

Set-Valued Anal., 8 (2000), 375-403. doi: 10.1023/A:1026514727329.  Google Scholar

[26]

J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 20 (2008), 133-164. doi: 10.1007/s10884-007-9089-7.  Google Scholar

[27]

2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.  Google Scholar

[28]

Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 139 (2009), 1-18.  Google Scholar

[29]

J. Differ. Equ., 253 (2012), 1544-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.015.  Google Scholar

[30]

J. Math. Phys., 54 (2013), 082703, 25 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.4817862.  Google Scholar

[31]

SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2015), 1018-1047. doi: 10.1137/140991819.  Google Scholar

[32]

J. Math. Phys., 51 (2010), 022701, 12 pp. doi: 10.1063/1.3277152.  Google Scholar

[33]

J. Differ. Equ., 232 (2007), 573-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.07.005.  Google Scholar

[34]

Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 71 (2013), 369-399. doi: 10.1090/S0033-569X-2013-01306-1.  Google Scholar

[35]

J. Differ. Equ., 259 (2015), 728-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.026.  Google Scholar

[36]

J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 24 (2012), 495-520. doi: 10.1007/s10884-012-9252-7.  Google Scholar

[37]

Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34 (2014), 301-333. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.301.  Google Scholar

[38]

J. Differ. Equ., 223 (2006), 367-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2005.06.008.  Google Scholar

[39]

Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 75 (2012), 485-502. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.08.050.  Google Scholar

[40]

Nonlinear Anal. TMA, 75 (2012), 2793-2805. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.11.022.  Google Scholar

[1]

Mohamed Ouzahra. Approximate controllability of the semilinear reaction-diffusion equation governed by a multiplicative control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021081
[2]

Xuping Zhang. Pullback random attractors for fractional stochastic $ p $-Laplacian equation with delay and multiplicative noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021107
[3]

Guangying Lv, Jinlong Wei, Guang-an Zou. Noise and stability in reaction-diffusion equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021005
[4]

Matheus C. Bortolan, José Manuel Uzal. Upper and weak-lower semicontinuity of pullback attractors to impulsive evolution processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3667-3692. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020252
[5]

Meng-Xue Chang, Bang-Sheng Han, Xiao-Ming Fan. Global dynamics of the solution for a bistable reaction diffusion equation with nonlocal effect. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021024
[6]

Wei-Jian Bo, Guo Lin, Shigui Ruan. Traveling wave solutions for time periodic reaction-diffusion systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (9) : 4329-4351. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018189
[7]

Yizhuo Wang, Shangjiang Guo. A SIS reaction-diffusion model with a free boundary condition and nonhomogeneous coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1627-1652. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018223
[8]

Jihoon Lee, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen. Gromov-Hausdorff stability of reaction diffusion equations with Robin boundary conditions under perturbations of the domain and equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 1263-1296. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021020
[9]

Nabahats Dib-Baghdadli, Rabah Labbas, Tewfik Mahdjoub, Ahmed Medeghri. On some reaction-diffusion equations generated by non-domiciliated triatominae, vectors of Chagas disease. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021004
[10]

Weihua Jiang, Xun Cao, Chuncheng Wang. Turing instability and pattern formations for reaction-diffusion systems on 2D bounded domain. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021085
[11]

Xiongxiong Bao, Wan-Tong Li. Existence and stability of generalized transition waves for time-dependent reaction-diffusion systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3621-3641. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020249
[12]

Simone Cacace, Maurizio Falcone. A dynamic domain decomposition for the eikonal-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 109-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.109
[13]

Bo Duan, Zhengce Zhang. A reaction-diffusion-advection two-species competition system with a free boundary in heterogeneous environment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021067
[14]

Izumi Takagi, Conghui Zhang. Existence and stability of patterns in a reaction-diffusion-ODE system with hysteresis in non-uniform media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3109-3140. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020400
[15]

Kin Ming Hui, Soojung Kim. Asymptotic large time behavior of singular solutions of the fast diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (11) : 5943-5977. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017258
[16]

Wided Kechiche. Global attractor for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a nonlinearity concentrated in one point. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021031
[17]

Jiacheng Wang, Peng-Fei Yao. On the attractor for a semilinear wave equation with variable coefficients and nonlinear boundary dissipation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021043
[18]

Vo Anh Khoa, Thi Kim Thoa Thieu, Ekeoma Rowland Ijioma. On a pore-scale stationary diffusion equation: Scaling effects and correctors for the homogenization limit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2451-2477. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020190
[19]

Haili Qiao, Aijie Cheng. A fast high order method for time fractional diffusion equation with non-smooth data. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021073
[20]

Hai-Liang Li, Tong Yang, Mingying Zhong. Diffusion limit of the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Kinetic & Related Models, 2021, 14 (2) : 211-255. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021003

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (68)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences